Sometimes we just don't have good reasons

Status
Not open for further replies.
The difference becomes more obvious when the 06 is in a longer action, and is loaded hotter.
Ive scratched 2700 with 208s and had no pressure signs.
This could be said of literally any cartridge though - load it longer and/or hotter than SAAMI and it gets faster. The same is true of .308. I'd say a fair comparison is what can be done within the SAAMI spec.
 
Remember though that .30-06 has a long history of under-performing, and most of it's reputation as a "great" cartridge is built on slower loadings that can be duplicated exactly.

Just out of curiosity, I looked at all the offerings Midway had of .30-06 with 190gr or heavier bullets. There was exactly one load (a DoubleTap 200gr load) that couldn't be duplicated in .308 within SAAMI spec using a temp-insensitive powder. The rest were just over-elongated .308 loads :D

I wouldn't care if the 30-06 was 200 fps slower in every configuration than a 308, I would still like it more.
 
I wouldn't care if the 30-06 was 200 fps slower in every configuration than a 308, I would still like it more.

And that's fine - people are free to like whatever they like. My point is that it has nothing to do with the performance of the cartridge which generally lags the performance of cartridges of similar capacity, recoil, and bore diameter.
 
This could be said of literally any cartridge though - load it longer and/or hotter than SAAMI and it gets faster. The same is true of .308. I'd say a fair comparison is what can be done within the SAAMI spec.
But you are more likely to run into a magazine length issue with the .308 which limits them to 2.9 at most? like i said I dont care for the .308 so im not horribly familiar with what magazine length are available.
Also, while SAAMI might be the standard, the pressure specs change depending what they were standardized at. This limits the comparison of cartridges within their specifications because of the different limits.
Not arguing, just stating my reasons for my opinion.
And as always, theres plenty of ways to skin a deer...or get a deer to skin, as the case maybe.
 
Not mocking; FL deer are small compared to most other places........
That has little to do with the effectiveness of a specific round for the species. A 180 pound deer weighs 50 pounds more than a 130 pound deer. The 50 additional pounds is more or less evenly distributed over a larger surface area- the larger body. It isn't 50 additional pounds of material stacked over the vitals, negatively impacting the capabilities or performance of the round in question. And at the end of the day, shot placement is always king.
 
Depends a lot on the .308 I guess. Some of them are built on long actions and have all the room in the world. And of course you have to consider where the lands are as well, since whatever you'd gain by loading long is more than lost by jamming the lands.

To be clear, I'm not saying that .30-06 isn't faster. It is - in a "fair" SAAMI spec comparison by about 100-150ft/s for most heavier bullets. If you let either cartridge go outside what SAAMI allows, that number will get bigger or smaller accordingly.

My point is more that the reputation of the .30-06 is based on historic loads that mostly involve poorly matched powders etc. If a 220gr partition at 2450 ft/s is a good brown bear round out of a .30-06, the same bullet at the same velocity out of a .308 isn't going to be any better or worse.
 
Last edited:
5)Some Mosin Nagant rifles were made by Remington and Westinghouse.
A lot more than "some". several hundred thousand were made and never delivered to the Russians.The army bought a lot of the Remingtons and a lot of the New England Westinghouse rifles ended up in Finland. I have one, a very early gun, with a 31" barrel and no upper hand guard . Never had one. It has the "SA" stamp , in a rectangle, on the barrel. No import stamps. It is one of the most accurate milsurps I own.
 
“More evidence for my theory that the .338WM is the wrong answer no matter what the question is. Unless the question is 'What caliber takes the same game as a .264WM and beats you to death doing it?" of course.”

You definitely think outside the box.

I just looked at my Lee and Hornady books. Neither lists a .308 load for 220 grain bullets and both do for 30-06. The Lee book also lists a 30-06 load for 250 grain bullets. You of course are entitled to your opinion but I believe most people would disagree with you on your .264 WM/.338 WM analogy and your supposition that the .308 is as versatile as the 30-06.
 
“If a 220gr partition at 2450 ft/s is a good brown bear round out of a .30-06, the same bullet at the same velocity out of a .308 isn't going to be any better or worse.”

That is true.
 
I grew up hearing tales of horror surrounding the “deer wounding 30-30”. Great ploy round these parts to separate farm boys from their cash as they replaced those old lever actions with 270s and -06s in a State where neither was legal to shoot deer with!

I don’t hate the 300 Win Mag, why would I but for the sake of spurning myself. The issue I take is when dear old dad suddenly realizes the -06 he bought me back in ‘91 (when he traded his 30-30) just can’t cut as much mustard as that “bigger” magnum .300

Cartridges I actually hate, .22 Mag and Hornet for costing what they do to shoot. Don’t care for all those WSMs that make so many old favorites seem rather dated as they remind me I have a 30-30 to get rid of.
 
I have a few other "Caliber Quirks"-
- I like the 270 Winchester, but I'd never own one in a Remington 700. Or any other Remington rifle. That'd be like dropping a Chevy engine under the hood of a Ford. It just ain't done! The 270 is so quintessentially Winchester, I cannot conceive of it ever owning one except in a Winchester Model 70. In fact, the only 270 Winchester I've ever owned was a Winchester Model 70 Lightweight. It was a good rifle and I foolishly traded it off.

- I like the 280 Remington, it's one of my favorites, but I'd never own one in a Winchester Model 70. When I was shopping for a Model 700 Mountain Rifle in 280 Remington, I stopped in B&E Guns in California to see if they had one. They had a 280, but it was in a Winchester Model 70 Lightweight. The Model 70 Lightweight is a good rifle, but I wanted a 280 Remington and 280 Remington in a Winchester would have been like dropping a Ford engine under the hood of a Chevy. After I handed the Winchester back to the salesman, he said "You can sleep at night knowing you turned down a deal like this?" You betcha!

- I don't like the 308 in a bolt action hunting rifle. I don't know why, but it just doesn't do anything for me. I'd get a 30-06 instead. However, I love the 308 in battle rifles, like the M14, HK91, FAL and "Big Block" ARs. 308 battlerifles hit with authority.

- I used to want a 44 Magnum. Until I got my hands on a 45 Colt. Anything a 44 Magnum can do, the 45 Colt can do better. As a result, I've never owned a 44 Magnum handgun. I've danced around it with a 41 Magnum and the 45 Colt, but never the 44 Magnum itself.
 
But you are more likely to run into a magazine length issue with the .308 which limits them to 2.9 at most? like i said I dont care for the .308 so im not horribly familiar with what magazine length are available.
Also, while SAAMI might be the standard, the pressure specs change depending what they were standardized at. This limits the comparison of cartridges within their specifications because of the different limits.
Not arguing, just stating my reasons for my opinion.
And as always, theres plenty of ways to skin a deer...or get a deer to skin, as the case maybe.
Therein lies the beauty of Tikka rifles (something I did not appreciate until I needed it in my 7mm-08) - you can run "short action" calibers out nice and long if you want. My 162 ELD-X's are running at 2.94" in my 7mm-08 with just a simple bolt stop and magazine modification. I'll never buy a Remington 700 for this very reason.
 
“If a 220gr partition at 2450 ft/s is a good brown bear round out of a .30-06, the same bullet at the same velocity out of a .308 isn't going to be any better or worse.”

That is true.
This is the idea that it seems so many people have a hard time accepting. I was telling my buddy that the 7mm bullet doesn't care what caliber it was fired from once it's in the air. It only matters how fast it's going, where it hits and what it's made of. And those are not caliber specific.

Like folks saying the 7mm-08 isn't enough gun for elk, but the 7mm Magnum is. I always ask them how far they will take a shot with their 7mm Mag. and they usually say 500+ Then sometimes I do, and sometimes I don't bother to explain that the 7mm-08 bullet is the exact same projectile at 400 yards as the 7mm Mag is at 500.
 
I grew up hearing tales of horror surrounding the “deer wounding 30-30”. Great ploy round these parts to separate farm boys from their cash as they replaced those old lever actions with 270s and -06s in a State where neither was legal to shoot deer with!

I don’t hate the 300 Win Mag, why would I but for the sake of spurning myself. The issue I take is when dear old dad suddenly realizes the -06 he bought me back in ‘91 (when he traded his 30-30) just can’t cut as much mustard as that “bigger” magnum .300

Cartridges I actually hate, .22 Mag and Hornet for costing what they do to shoot. Don’t care for all those WSMs that make so many old favorites seem rather dated as they remind me I have a 30-30 to get rid of.
Skylerbone, I have absolutely no reason to like my old 30-30 as much as I do, other than the fact that it was a Christmas gift from my dad when I was 14, it's a pre-64 and it has that buttery smooth lever action, it most definitely has that "cool factor" and low and behold it's killed a lot of critters for me dead as a hammer. But when you start comparing ballistics and accuracy, it loses even to my little 'ol 7.62x39 bolt action hands down. But I still love that gun.
 
But, but.... if your going to have a long action anyway you should have 280 or 7mag, not that puny little 7-08!!!! LoL
Im only partially being facetious, as i do fall into the group that if im carrying a long action ill take the xtra 300fps of the 7mm.
I really want the 7-08 in a model 7 with a 22" tube and an ultralite stock...why the model 7? Well....cause!

Perhaps thats where some of my peculiar prejudices come from. I dont generally like action that are too large for their cartridges and cartridges that are too long for their actions.
Part of why i never liked the 284 bassed rounds untill i got actions that were nearly perfectly sized for them, also why i prefer the 6.5 CMs to the .260 in general. Not because its actually better it just "fits" better in my mind.
Actually if cost were not an issue id be inclined to do a 7cm over the 7-08 in the model 7 for the same reason.

Oh hey that made me think of a rifle i can add to the thread about the one you wont get rid of....my 6x47 falls into that exact category. I love the rifle, and i love the round, but the small bolt face, and 2.5" coal coupled with the standard short action messes with me.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't care if the 30-06 was 200 fps slower..

Yeah, lots of the hogs I have killed have been with a 7-08 using loads that duplicate my 7mm BR loads. Quite a bit lighter than factory 7-08 stuff but the partitions still kill them just as dead as my 50 BMG would.
 
“More evidence for my theory that the .338WM is the wrong answer no matter what the question is. Unless the question is 'What caliber takes the same game as a .264WM and beats you to death doing it?" of course.”

You definitely think outside the box.

I just looked at my Lee and Hornady books. Neither lists a .308 load for 220 grain bullets and both do for 30-06. The Lee book also lists a 30-06 load for 250 grain bullets. You of course are entitled to your opinion but I believe most people would disagree with you on your .264 WM/.338 WM analogy and your supposition that the .308 is as versatile as the 30-06.
So your argument is that because 220gr .308 is not in two of the least comprehensive reloading guides that it's not a thing? There's 54 published loads I know of for .308 220 grain ranging from softballs up to 2450 (Handloader #57). And the actual temp-stable velocity champ is RL16, which is good for right at 2500 in a 24" at SAAMI max length and pressure.

As far as the .338WM, it's a horrible dangerous game rifle. In all such circumstances your would be far, far better off with a .375. And as a plains game rifle, it has nothing to offer over the .264 except less reach and a sore shoulder. It really is the worst of all possible worlds :D Heck, even the .30-06 is more useful.
 
Was discussing my affinity for the 7x57 and 7mm-08 as a hunting calibers with a friend the other night and another good friend of mine chimed in the conversation to say he hated the 7mm-08. His reason? He said he saw "too many" deer wounded with one several years ago. So I started asking him the details and it turns out that he took a neck shot on a doe at 50 yards that resulted in an 18-hour tracking job. Said that several others at that same hunt also wounded and lost deer using the 7mm-08.

But (get this) he goes on to tell us that he's a die-hard .243 fan for deer and also likes the .308. :rofl:

I was like, so you are a fan of the caliber on either side of the 7mm-08, but the 7mm-08 is only good for wounding deer? o_O I told him that shot placement is a lot more important than caliber, especially on a doe at 50 yards, but wasn't hearing any of it.

At that point he started to get a bit upset so I just let it go.

Anyone else run into folks that just don't have good reasons for not liking a certain caliber?
Whenever I come across people like
Was discussing my affinity for the 7x57 and 7mm-08 as a hunting calibers with a friend the other night and another good friend of mine chimed in the conversation to say he hated the 7mm-08. His reason? He said he saw "too many" deer wounded with one several years ago. So I started asking him the details and it turns out that he took a neck shot on a doe at 50 yards that resulted in an 18-hour tracking job. Said that several others at that same hunt also wounded and lost deer using the 7mm-08.

But (get this) he goes on to tell us that he's a die-hard .243 fan for deer and also likes the .308. :rofl:

I was like, so you are a fan of the caliber on either side of the 7mm-08, but the 7mm-08 is only good for wounding deer? o_O I told him that shot placement is a lot more important than caliber, especially on a doe at 50 yards, but wasn't hearing any of it.

At that point he started to get a bit upset so I just let it go.

Anyone else run into folks that just don't have good reasons for not liking a certain caliber?
Whenever I have discussions with folks like your friend, A couple of quotes coming to mind: "A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still", and " Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!"
 
Yeah, lots of the hogs I have killed have been with a 7-08 using loads that duplicate my 7mm BR loads. Quite a bit lighter than factory 7-08 stuff but the partitions still kill them just as dead as my 50 BMG would.
I used to own the XP-100 in 7MM BR - that was fun, and very accurate, to shoot - always thought that would make a coyote/antelope rifle good to 250 yards or so
 
I can't say I hate any cartridges-but I've shot some where the round/gun combination wasn't copacetic- 7mm Rem. Mag. from a 700 BDL, did not like the recoil-but I realize that was as much stock design as anything else. Shot one in a F-Class stock, felt like a .30-06. I had a .300 Win. Mag. Ruger M77 in a McMillan stock; even with my hot moose loads it purred like a .308. Shot a Sendero in the same caliber, 'bout ripped my arm off. The guy who owned it couldn't shoot it accurately at all because of the stock design. (I was on the target set a 965 yards in 2, he didn't hit it once in 5.)
 
I sure wish the 7mm BR was still around. Would be the perfect little brother to my 7mm-08.
 
So your argument is that because 220gr .308 is not in two of the least comprehensive reloading guides that it's not a thing? There's 54 published loads I know of for .308 220 grain ranging from softballs up to 2450 (Handloader #57). And the actual temp-stable velocity champ is RL16, which is good for right at 2500 in a 24" at SAAMI max length and pressure.

As far as the .338WM, it's a horrible dangerous game rifle. In all such circumstances your would be far, far better off with a .375. And as a plains game rifle, it has nothing to offer over the .264 except less reach and a sore shoulder. It really is the worst of all possible worlds :D Heck, even the .30-06 is more useful.

I still believe the 30-06 is more versatile, we will have to agree to disagree on that point.

Regarding your disdain for the .338 WinMag, just the other day I was reading an article by David Petzal in which he states it is his favorite cartridge. It is also very popular in Africa and Alaska not only with hunters but with guides. And now you are bringing up that the .338 WM is a horrible dangerous game rifle? Where did that come from? That wasn’t part of the discussion up until now. Some hunters believe it to be excellent on lion and leopard, hunters with much more experience than you or I hunting dangerous game. And to say a .264 WM is as good or better on all non dangerous game is ridiculous and you don’t have any facts to back it up. Regarding recoil there are many who find .300 WM recoil more unpleasant than .338 WM. 6.5 is my favorite caliber but a .338 is better than a .264 on some game. Eland comes to mind off the top of my head. I’m sure there are more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top