Ultimate Bear Stopper

Status
Not open for further replies.

94045

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2018
Messages
1,565
Another post about pistols for bears got me thinking. What would be the ultimate bear stopping rifle?

If you were on Kodiak with a deer down and a Big Coastie circling and woofing in the fog what would you most want in your hands.

Would you want a traditional controlled round feed bolt rifle in .375 H&H?

How about a Heym 89B Double in .450/400?

Or how about something custom like a Browning BAR or BLR .300 Win Mag converted to .416 Ruger?

Personally I would prefer a Ma Deuce but they are s little aggravating to lug around.
 
Last edited:
How about a BAR converted to .416 Taylor? .358 Norma? I’ve always wondered if that was possible...
:thumbup:

Personally my guide gun .45/70 is enough for me to want should I be in coastal bear country...

Stay safe!
 
If you were on Kodiak with a deer down and a Big Coastie circling and woofing in the fog what would you most want in your hands.
The rifle I would most likely have in my hands would be the same rifle I used to put the deer down. That doesn't mean it's the rifle I would most want in my hands when there's "a Big Coastie circling and woofing in the fog," but it is the most likely because I'm not likely to carry two rifles on a deer hunt.
Therefore, I'd go for a good, dependable 375 H&H. Or better yet, my old Model 70, 338 Win Mag because I already have it.:)
 
.404 Jeffery because if I ever buy a rifle chambered for a cartridge more powerful than .338 WinMag it will be a .404 Jeffery. But I’m with .308 Norma. If I’m deer hunting I’ll be carrying a rifle chambered in a deer cartridge. Under the scenario represented I would have a guide since it’s Kodiak island and also because I’m not an intrepid Kilcher. I’d tell the guide, you lead, I’ll be BEHIND you the whole way.
 
Last edited:
My only brother lives in the MatSu area -just about 30 miles north of Palmer and has lived a subsistence life style for many years with only game meat in the freezers... Where he hunts in the interior the bears are nowhere near as big coasties - but most of them have learned that a rifle shot means a feeding opportunity and can get aggressive about it... He tells me you don't hunt solo ever and because willow and aspen thickets are high and dense, if a bear is coming (hopefully only false charging) you can hear him - but can't see him (and won't until he gets close...).

As a result, all of his hunts are with a 375 H&H, period (he has three of them - all bought used in-state over the years). That same rifle is used in open tundra for caribou for long shots -or for hunting moose up close in timber - and much in-between. He'll take a small black bear for roasts and stews but has never (yet) had to shoot a grizz. That 375 should be up to the job if it's ever needed.

Me, I'm not a hunter (except for two-legged animals - and I've quit doing that...) - I'm a fisherman and live a world away, down in south Florida. My brother? He thinks salmon is what you feed your dogs...
 
How about a BAR converted to .416 Taylor? .358 Norma? I’ve always wondered if that was possible...
:thumbup:

Personally my guide gun .45/70 is enough for me to want should I be in coastal bear country...

Stay safe!

.416 Ruger is the same diameter at the case head and the body is the same diameter as the belt on the .300 Win Mag / .375 H&H / .416 Taylor just carriers that diameter all the way forward and retains the 3.34" overall length The .416 Ruger is factory loaded and would be as stronger cartridge than the Taylor as it has more capacity.

I chose the .416 Ruger as I believe it is the largest practical cartridge in powder capacity and size for those actions without the sectional density and stability issues the .458 Win Mag has had (although newer bullet designs may have alleviated this).

If you want an interesting read sometime read about the dismal failure the .458 was at its intro in Africa. It absolutely failed to penetrate on buffalo due to a lack of sectional density, to lightly constructed bullets and inadequate velocity to stabilize in flesh (tumbling with resulting loss of penetration). The sad thing was the very engineer that designed the cartridge tried to tell the Ad Men that it shouldn't be used on thick skin / dangerous game and nobody would listen and a few good men died as a result.
 
.404 Jeffery because if I ever buy a rifle chambered for a cartridge more powerful than .338 WinMag it will be a .404 Jeffery. But I’m with .308 Norma. If I’m deer hunting I’ll be carry a rifle chambered in a deer cartridge. Under the scenario represented I would have a guide since it’s Kodiak island and also because I’m not an intrepid Kilcher. I’d tell the guide, you lead, I’ll be BEHIND you the whole way.

Good choice. After the .375 H&H the .404 Jeffrey is likely the most pleasant of the Classic African Dangerous Game Cartridges to shoot.

I'm not ashamed to admit I'm to much of a whimp for the .416 Rigby I shot on a regular basis (although the CZ550 Lux has a good stock it's a little light) . The only three ADG Cartridges I have shot that I would consider are the .375 H&H (More pleasant than some .300's I've shot). The .404 Jeffrey (Definitely more pleasant than the one .338 I've shot) and the .450/400 NE but then the rifles I shot were proper weight for caliber with a proper stock design for recoil. A straight stock and light weight in a .338 Win Mag is a recipe for a Sadist. Definitely worse than the .416 Rigby I mentioned above.
 
For what I would be willing to actually carry? A marlin 45-70 or a 12 gauge autoloader with something really nasty.
 
.416 Ruger is the same diameter at the case head and the body is the same diameter as the belt on the .300 Win Mag / .375 H&H / .416 Taylor just carriers that diameter all the way forward and retains the 3.34" overall length The .416 Ruger is factory loaded and would be as stronger cartridge than the Taylor as it has more capacity.

I chose the .416 Ruger as I believe it is the largest practical cartridge in powder capacity and size for those actions without the sectional density and stability issues the .458 Win Mag has had (although newer bullet designs may have alleviated this).

If you want an interesting read sometime read about the dismal failure the .458 was at its intro in Africa. It absolutely failed to penetrate on buffalo due to a lack of sectional density, to lightly constructed bullets and inadequate velocity to stabilize in flesh (tumbling with resulting loss of penetration). The sad thing was the very engineer that designed the cartridge tried to tell the Ad Men that it shouldn't be used on thick skin / dangerous game and nobody would listen and a few good men died as a result.
I knew the Taylor and Norma mags would probably only need a new barrel and proper gassing to fit the BAR, but I don’t know if the gun would be battered to death by the increased recoil these rounds develop over the .338. I also didn’t know if the Ruger was a magnum bolt head sized round or larger, but if they’re the same size the Ruger rounds could also be a possibility for a simpler rebarreling job than adding a bolt head modification to it as well.

The .458 just doesn’t have the ooomph to be super reliable on those big animals, (and neither would the .45/70), but they both seem to be used in Africa a lot. (Speaking of Lott, his .458 is much more effective at causing damage... on both ends of the gun :what:...

Stay safe!
 
If I was the deer hunter, as others have mentioned, I would probably have my deer rifle, a BAR in .270 Win with 150 grains power points. I would not feel undergunned in front of any bear. I might miss if the bear charged me though, it kind of gets someone nervous, I guess. The gun would not be faulty, I might. If I was fishing and carrying for defensive purpose, it would be my twelve gauge pump loaded with four Brenneke slugs followed by two 00 Buck 2.75 loads. If I ever get to the buckshot, it will be so close that penetration should be adequate.
 
When I was in that position, a couple times 30 and 35 years ago the first time with a. Ruger 77 .338 win with a Leupold 2-8 with post and the second time with a Pre 64 Wincherster Super Grade .375 with a 1.5-6 Zeiss with German heavy picket post. Bear was on the tag the first time so I was hoping
 
Last edited:
Most Alaskan hunting guides use a 12 ga slug gun, .45-70 (or .50 Alaskan) lever gun, or .375 HH mag, in my understanding,, and roughly in that order of popularity -- though all manner of chamberings and configs are used, of course. "Ultimate" is limited solely by weight (practicality) and recoil tolerance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top