This is kind of a follow-on question to my Throat Erosion thread from a few days ago. Given the lead times I'm seeing for certain barrels I'm strongly considering ordering a new barrel now so I can have it on hand when the current (.243) barrel throws in the towel.
I'm really leaning heavily towards rebarreling in 6.5 Creedmoor. The gun will continue to be used in the same way I've used it in .243: Steel silhouettes out to 500m; plus "plinking" (i.e. dabbling....not competing) shooting paper at 1,000 yds.
Using Berger's bullet stability calculator it looks like both a 1:8 and a 1:7 twist would work well, but the 1:7 produces higher stability scores than the 1:8.
Is stability something where more is better - always? Or is it more a scenario where once it gets over a certain amount (e.g. above Marginally Stable using Berger's terms) more doesn't matter?
From a pure numbers standpoint 1:7 looks like the right answer. Are there reasons I wouldn't want to do that?
Thanks.
OR
I'm really leaning heavily towards rebarreling in 6.5 Creedmoor. The gun will continue to be used in the same way I've used it in .243: Steel silhouettes out to 500m; plus "plinking" (i.e. dabbling....not competing) shooting paper at 1,000 yds.
Using Berger's bullet stability calculator it looks like both a 1:8 and a 1:7 twist would work well, but the 1:7 produces higher stability scores than the 1:8.
Is stability something where more is better - always? Or is it more a scenario where once it gets over a certain amount (e.g. above Marginally Stable using Berger's terms) more doesn't matter?
From a pure numbers standpoint 1:7 looks like the right answer. Are there reasons I wouldn't want to do that?
Thanks.
OR