Cheap Off-Brand Handgun That Turned out to be a Tack-Driver

Status
Not open for further replies.
I (like FL Swamp Rat) own an H&R 922,,,
It's a skinny 6" barrel and is way more precise a shooter than I am.

140630-HR_922-lr.jpg

It's an odd specimen though,,,
Mine is apparently a very early model,,,
There is nothing that keeps the cylinder in register.

At first I thought it was broken but several people on this and other forums said it's the way the early ones were made.

In single action it out shoots every other .22 revolver I own,,,
Or maybe I just shoot it better than the others.

Aarond

.
 
Yep, cheaply made but runs like a frigging top and keeps on going. Can nail 3" targets doing rapid fire as fast as I can pull the trigger. Snobs HATE these guns. Lol, especially the one's that never shot one. Have been running these guns now going on 10 years.Phoenix Hpa 22
RN8kb4u.png

Also picked up this Rossi 32 S&W Long and in single action is amazing at accuracy. Was In NEW condition when I acquired it. Given to me from a friend whose Father passed away. She did not want it, and was given as a gift.

YxOJgsS.jpg
 
I had a S&W 639 that was a pleasure to shoot and crazy accurate. Sould not have sold it.
 
Nevermind.....i don't have any obscure/off brand hand guns. Although Kahr has become an off brand due my experience w P380.....
 
On a whim, I bought an Iver Johnson Hawk (Commander) 1911.($550) Ceracote finish, full beavertail hammer. Good to go as any Colt I ever bought. I added grips, and a full length recoil guide and use Chip McCormick mags. All good!

45.jpg
 
Last edited:
$200 heritage roughrider 4.5” 22wmr/lr 9 shot single action revolver. it won’t likely be passed on lovingly to my unborn grandchildren as would a ruger single six or bearcat, but in my lousy hands it shoots just as well.
 

Attachments

  • 3FF37BE8-9858-4290-BAC1-27A144E3F4A1.jpeg
    3FF37BE8-9858-4290-BAC1-27A144E3F4A1.jpeg
    147.7 KB · Views: 1
Rossi 971 stainless steel.357. Hit a water bottle at 50 yds off hand first shot. Payed $200. Wish I would have kept it. Thing was scary accurate.
 
I love the consistent accuracy of both the Phoenix 22s and the Heritage RR 22s. I own 4 of each and they are all great shooters.
The only one I've had an issue with is my 3.5 inch Birds Head grip HRR. It is shooting low left but I'm thinking that's all on me. Still haven't settled on a consistent grip with the birds head so I think I'm pushing it as I anticipate the shot breaking.
 
Wow. Jim NE, Tallball, and Meeks36 all owned Rossi 971's and they were all tackdrivers.

It might not be a coincidence.

(FWIW, mine was from the Interarms era.)
 
I love the consistent accuracy of both the Phoenix 22s and the Heritage RR 22s. I own 4 of each and they are all great shooters.
The only one I've had an issue with is my 3.5 inch Birds Head grip HRR. It is shooting low left but I'm thinking that's all on me. Still haven't settled on a consistent grip with the birds head so I think I'm pushing it as I anticipate the shot breaking.

i recently got a jimenez ja22 22lr semiauto pistol. chose the ja22 over phoenix because latter’s safeties and takedown seem a tad more complicated. i like the ja22’s size and feel, but need to shoot it more. the hrr’s birdshead grips are an odd duck to me, too bad because the associated 3.5” barrel is quite handy. my heritage and rugers with birdshead grips all found new homes. the 4.5” hrr with plowhandle grips is a fine inexpensive plinker.
 
i recently got a jimenez ja22 22lr semiauto pistol. chose the ja22 over phoenix because latter’s safeties and takedown seem a tad more complicated. i like the ja22’s size and feel, but need to shoot it more. the hrr’s birdshead grips are an odd duck to me, too bad because the associated 3.5” barrel is quite handy. my heritage and rugers with birdshead grips all found new homes. the 4.5” hrr with plowhandle grips is a fine inexpensive plinker.
Yes the 4.5s with the plow handle are great . I've got 2 of them and a 6 incher too. Love them all.
 
I (like FL Swamp Rat) own an H&R 922,,,
It's a skinny 6" barrel and is way more precise a shooter than I am.

Aarond.

I bought mine simply because I didn't have a .22 revolver. I figured it would make a good plinker, as well as a good introductory gun for any non-shooting friends who I might tempt to go to the range. To my great surprise and joy it turned out to be very accurate. Very pleased with the purchase.
 
Many years ago I was really into hi-powers and had several. I was at a gun show and saw a table that had two FEG hi-power clones for dirt cheap so I bought one. I brought it home and cleaned it and immediately shot the best groups I had ever shot with a hi-power. I liked it so much that I went back the next day to buy the other one but it was already gone. Yes it shot better than my Belgium guns.
 
"My first pistol was a Taurus model 66."

I think I had a 22 and a 380 beforehand, but my Taurus Model 66 was my first real handgun. I bought it almost new in 1988. I had to use it for SD twice. It was stolen in a burglary around the year 2000. It was a simple blued 4". Its trigger was very nice and it was more accurate than I was. It was probably as accurate as any handgun I've ever owned, excepting my best Smith revolvers and 22 autos.

I replaced it within a few months. I got a used Taurus Model 689 for $199 at a LGS. It apparently hadn't been shot much. It shoots at least as well as the original. The 689 was the fancy version of the Model 66. It was stainless steel and had a ventilated rib. At first I put Pachmayars on it, but when I wore them out, I replaced them with Ebay Thai hardwood grips. It's still my preferred HD handgun, and I have many other options

 
Last edited:
"...saw a table that had two FEG hi-power clones for dirt cheap..."

Me too. Some guy was trying to trade his almost new one towards something else at a gun show in the late 1980's. He wanted $200 and the dealer was trying to work him down. I offered him $200 cash on the spot and walked away with it. I still have it. The only times it ever malfunctioned as when I tried to feed it a $5.00 box of Chinese ammo. It's as accurate as its somewhat gritty trigger and small sights allow. When my eyes and fingers were better it was very accurate. Even now it shoots just fine: as good or better than most service pistols.

View media item 1476
 
I wouldn't call it "cheap", but my Citadel 3 1/2" M1911 is definitely a lesser known brand.

I've been extremely impressed by it. It has without a doubt, the best out of the box trigger of any M1911 I've ever owned. It's also as accurate as any out of the box M1911 I've ever shot.
 
I have an odd assortment of handguns. The brands that I own the most of are Ruger, S&W, and Beretta... I believe in that order. However, I own a bunch of other cheap and/or oddball ones just because. Have you ever bought one of those that is laser-like accurate?




I'm not talking about something like my Taurus G2 or a Star Super B. I have those. They were inexpensive. Mine shoot about as well as a "comparable" Glock or Colt, but not better. I'm not talking about a Ruger or S&W that were surprisingly inexpensive due to appearance issues. Yeah, I paid very low prices for my Ruger Standard and S&W K22, but it's not a surprise that they're extremely accurate. I'm talking about off-brand handguns that many would turn up their noses at, but your particular example is crazy accurate and people are just amazed when they try it out.

I have had hit-and-miss luck with Taurus handguns. Some were pretty good, some were okay or mediocre, one was terrible. I didn't have a DA/SA 357 revolver with a 6" barrel. I lucked onto an old Taurus on GB that no one wanted. It was an "Old Model" with different parts and grips than the newer ones. Nobody was very interested, so I won it on a bid of around $300. When I went to pick it up at the LGS, my friend warned me that something might be broken inside; that's how light the trigger pull was. No, it's just an old model that has some kind of S&W internal hammer block instead of a transfer bar. It's absurdly accurate. I don't know if it's more or less accurate than my S&W K22 or Model 28, but those three are my best SA/DA revolvers out of dozens, and they will punch holes all through a bulleys until my arms get tired. Its grips were a little loose and made of unobtanium, so I stuck a folded piece of paper between the wood and the frame, and the problem was solved.

I had heard good things about Tanfoglio C&75 "clones" and wanted another full-sized DA/SA 9mm in addition to my Beretta, but preferably with a steel frame. I saw a bunch of Israeli surplus versions from military-affiliated shooting clubs ("Cohai") and decided to gamble $330. After I got it, I realized that it had been shot a LOT. It has fixed sights and a marred finish. But this thing is ridiculous. Its DA and SA are absurdly nice for a service pistol, it shoots straight to POA, and it's slightly larger than the more modern CZ versions (good for my huge hands). It seems like everyone who shoots it wants to buy if from me or wants to buy one just like it. It's not for sale. After my FiL shot it for the first time he bought himself a new CZ75. He was disappointed that the frame was slightly smaller and the trigger wasn't quite as good, but it is still his most accurate center-fire service pistol (out of a couple of dozen).
View media item 1465
I had heard good things about a weird Rossi revolver, the Model 720. Apparently they made a nice 44 special revolver for just two or three years around the early 1990's. It was a little smaller than a K-frame, made in stainless steel, had a 3" barrel, and was available with fixed or adjustable sights, and SA/DA or DAO hammer. I ran across one for around $400. I had problems with it at first and took it to a local gunsmith. Apparently it was still full of 1990-ish packing grease, and someone had probably enjoyed flipping the cylinder shut like in stupid tv shows and movies. He was able to fix it up pretty well.

Then the hammer-nose firing pin broke off! Apparently the same idiot original owner liked to dry-fire it a lot. There were no such parts available. My FiL, in an extreme act of kindness, carefully hand-fitted a S&W Model 10 nose-hammer firing pin until it fit properly.

It is now a ridiculous revolver. The DA and SA triggers are extremely good. Its size and grips seem to fit both large and small well. Its sights are probably fragile (especially the plastic front one), but extremely accurate. I can empty a box of 50 rounds into a small hole at seven yards or a palm-sized hole at 15 yards. If there are a couple of flyers towards the end, that just means I'm getting tired.
View media item 1900


I had a Tarus revolver in the late 80's early 90's, basically a 6 inch k frame knock off that was fabulous to shoot. The cylinder got loose from hot loads and my favorite small gun shop took it in towards a new gp 100 + $40, still have the Ruger today.
 
I have a Hi Point 45: it won't shoot some of the sparkling groups posted in this thread, but it is much more accurate than its reputation suggests.

I think it comes down to the single action trigger, the fixed barrel, and the huge weight of the pistol keeping everything steady - it's almost built like a target pistol just by economy and accident. Whatever the reason is, I shoot that Hi Point better than a Glock and much better than most DA autos like a Beretta 92.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top