Paper Cartdridges and Needle Guns

Status
Not open for further replies.

whm1974

member
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Messages
3,051
I was just reading about 19th Century Needle Guns and Paper Cartridges that used before Modern Ammunition was invented.

The paper cartridges the user or soldier had to tear open the unit, pouring the powder and ram the bullet down the barrel. This lead to problems if tallow and/or lard was used to grease the paper as what caused the Hindi and Muslim Rebellion in British India.

Later developments allowed for the entire cartridge to be insert into the chamber or barrel giving some advantages .

Even now they are still are in fair used with papershot in extremely cold areas where plastic will become brittle with cold.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_cartridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_cartridge
 
When I was shooting Trap regularly, I used mostly plastic shells because they could be reloaded more times than paper. But I always enjoyed the smell of hot wax from paper shells. Not just a cold weather thing, that article is weird lumps every use of paper in ammunition together as though it was all the same.
https://www.federalpremium.com/shotshell/gold-medal-grand/gold-medal-grand-paper/11-GMT171+8.html
As I never used them, I really don't know anything about paper cartridges.
 
A big problem with needle guns was erosion and breakage of the long, fragile firing pin. Despite the effectiveness of the Dreyse in Prussian hands, many troops preffered captured French Chassepots when they could grab them. Although also referred to a needle type, the Chassepots needle was much shorter and more durable and used silk cartridges with the primer near the back end instead of in the center like the Dreyse.
 
Last edited:
A big problem with needle guns was erosion and breakage of the long, fragile firing pin. Despite the effectiveness of the Dreyse in Prussian hands, many troops preffered captured French Chassepots when they could grab them. Although also referred to a needle type, the Chassepots needle was much shorter and more durable and used silk cartridges with the primer near the back end instead of in the center like the Dreyse.
Weren't the Prussian troops well trained and supplied with spare firing pins so they could fix the their guns in the field?
 
Weren't the Prussian troops well trained and supplied with spare firing pins so they could fix the their guns in the field?
Sure, but you really want to try to perform such a task under fire? Not me.

Hard to say how many spare parts got "lost" to lighten a troopers load too. Ounces count when you have to march cross country to your battlefield.
 
Sure, but you really want to try to perform such a task under fire? Not me.

Hard to say how many spare parts got "lost" to lighten a troopers load too. Ounces count when you have to march cross country to your battlefield.
Firing pins for the Prussian Needles Gun weighed that much???
 
Paper cartridges came about as being far safer in military use than a powder horn or bottle. (Imagine what happens if there are still burning embers in the bore and you upend a powder horn over them.)
They were also a side effect of better--more uniform--powder production.
All of which is better when you are training troopies to fire as fast as they possibly can. Even more so with only rudimentary-trained conscripts.

Your order of operations is slightly off, though. You pluck a cartridge from the box, and tear a corner to prime the pan, then close same. The rest of the powder goes down the bore. Depending upon the Nation, the paper might go over the powder as a wad, or it might be kept around the ball as patching. UK Royal Army practice was to bite the cartridge to prime the pan and barrel, then spit the bullet in, followed by the paper as a top wadding.

When percussion caps and Mineé balls the thing, the steps changed a bit. The fit of the ball ammo was tighter in rifled muskets, so they needed no patching (generally). The paper was often just discarded.

Now, the needle guns were different. You opened the breech and poked the entire cartridge in, and close the thing up. "Chap" over at the Bloke on the Range YT channel actually makes them for his Chassepot:

(There's a shooting vid, too, but, durst if I can find it quickly--and I may be seraching badly, as it might have been a Dreyse.)
 
I guess changing a needle under fire would be in the same ballpark as replacing a flint or a split nipple for a muzzleloader.

Has anybody here shot a Westley Richards Monkeytail Carbine? Seems to me like a good approach to the "capping breechloader".
 
I was just reading about 19th Century Needle Guns and Paper Cartridges that used before Modern Ammunition was invented.

The paper cartridges the user or soldier had to tear open the unit, pouring the powder and ram the bullet down the barrel. This lead to problems if tallow and/or lard was used to grease the paper as what caused the Hindi and Muslim Rebellion in British India.

Later developments allowed for the entire cartridge to be insert into the chamber or barrel giving some advantages .

Even now they are still are in fair used with papershot in extremely cold areas where plastic will become brittle with cold.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_cartridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_cartridge

I'm afraid there is some confusion here.

Paper cartridges used with a needle gun were not torn open. They were placed in the breech of the rifle and fired, rather like a modern metallic cartridge. The purpose of the "needle" firing pin was that it pierced the paper, drove through the powder, and struck the primer situated on the back of the bullet, thereby igniting the powder form the top end.

There were no needle guns in use in India at the time of the Mutiny. The rifle that gave rise to sepoy Pandy's mutiny was the 1853 Pattern Enfield Musket, which fired a Minie ball and used a paper cartridge (as well as percussion caps) to hold the powder. Standard drill was to tear the cartridge open with the teeth, pour it down the barrel and push remaining paper and ball down the barrel. Rumors began that the paper cartridge was variously greased with beef fat or pork fat, and thus objectionable to both Hindu and Muslim.
 
Paper cartridges came about as being far safer in military use than a powder horn or bottle. (Imagine what happens if there are still burning embers in the bore and you upend a powder horn over them.)
They were also a side effect of better--more uniform--powder production.
All of which is better when you are training troopies to fire as fast as they possibly can. Even more so with only rudimentary-trained conscripts.

Your order of operations is slightly off, though. You pluck a cartridge from the box, and tear a corner to prime the pan, then close same. The rest of the powder goes down the bore. Depending upon the Nation, the paper might go over the powder as a wad, or it might be kept around the ball as patching. UK Royal Army practice was to bite the cartridge to prime the pan and barrel, then spit the bullet in, followed by the paper as a top wadding.

When percussion caps and Mineé balls the thing, the steps changed a bit. The fit of the ball ammo was tighter in rifled muskets, so they needed no patching (generally). The paper was often just discarded.

Now, the needle guns were different. You opened the breech and poked the entire cartridge in, and close the thing up. "Chap" over at the Bloke on the Range YT channel actually makes them for his Chassepot:

(There's a shooting vid, too, but, durst if I can find it quickly--and I may be seraching badly, as it might have been a Dreyse.)

That needle gun looks to be brand new and well taken care of. Is there company that makes such replicas?
 
That needle gun looks to be brand new and well taken care of. Is there company that makes such replicas?
Not so far as I know.
Now, because there is a low demand for needle-fire arms, apparently really excellent copies are readily available.
IIRC The Chap has an equally gorgeous Gras rifle and a selection of Vetterlis, which are available for less than 300 Swiss Francs (and some under ChF200).

(oh, and the Chap, being of French descent, has a number of French rifles, to include a FAMAS with fun switch, under Swiss law it can only be shot at a couple of national matches, but is otherwise legal.)
 
Not so far as I know.
Now, because there is a low demand for needle-fire arms, apparently really excellent copies are readily available.
IIRC The Chap has an equally gorgeous Gras rifle and a selection of Vetterlis, which are available for less than 300 Swiss Francs (and some under ChF200).

(oh, and the Chap, being of French descent, has a number of French rifles, to include a FAMAS with fun switch, under Swiss law it can only be shot at a couple of national matches, but is otherwise legal.)
I thought that needle guns since there were not in use for that long and only adopted by few nations, are sort of rare...

Are the paper cartridges for these guns considered to be "Fixed Ammunition" by the ATF?
 
I never had mutton before, lamb meat in curries and Greek gyros. In fact I just had a Greek Gyro from Abry's last time I went grocery shopping.
Their Gyros are shockingly good! Their Ruebens arent too shabby either......:)

And now, to keep this firearm related, some random gun porn-
acu9w1.jpg
Its may not use greased cartridges, but it IS Indian! Lol.

*GunnyUSMC's picture, mine is just like it, but his camera is better.:D
 
Their Gyros are shockingly good! Their Ruebens arent too shabby either......:)

And now, to keep this firearm related, some random gun porn-
View attachment 917430
Its may not use greased cartridges, but it IS Indian! Lol.

*GunnyUSMC's picture, mine is just like it, but his camera is better.:D
Is that India's version of the British Lee-Infield but chambered for 7.62x51 NATO? Where is the 12 round Magazine for it?
 
Is that India's version of the British Lee-Infield but chambered for 7.62x51 NATO? Where is the 12 round Magazine for it?
That is (or at least mine is), an Enfield No.1 Mk3 made at the Ishapore Arsenal in 1918, and as such was originally chambered for .303, but later converted into a single-shot .410 smoothbore for use by prison guards and foragers, hence no magazine. The mag. well is filled in with a wooden plug.

They are a blast to shoot with just enough recoil to keep things interesting, and surprising accuracy with rifled slugs.

The Enfield 2A was the 1950s version chambered for 7.62 Nato.
 
That is (or at least mine is), an Enfield No.1 Mk3 made at the Ishapore Arsenal in 1918, and as such was originally chambered for .303, but later converted into a single-shot .410 smoothbore for use by prison guards and foragers, hence no magazine. The mag. well is filled in with a wooden plug.

They are a blast to shoot with just enough recoil to keep things interesting, and surprising accuracy with rifled slugs.

The Enfield 2A was the 1950s version chambered for 7.62 Nato.
I'm not sure how well a .410 Gauge Shotgun would be for prison guards, especially s single shot one at that...
 
I understand it was originally chambered for a shotshell based on .303 blown out straight. Cut for .410 when sold surplus.
I wouldn't want to be peppered with birdshot on my way from gaol to jungle, especially in the pre-antibiotic era.
 
I understand it was originally chambered for a shotshell based on .303 blown out straight. Cut for .410 when sold surplus.
I wouldn't want to be peppered with birdshot on my way from gaol to jungle, especially in the pre-antibiotic era.
Well true... But how much and what size birdshot can a .410 shotshell contain back in whatever year that Enfield was converted over?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top