Jim Watson
Member
University of Alabama - Huntsville.
The range also got bad publicity after it became known that a murderess had practiced there before shooting up her faculty meeting.
It's possible that this paragraph,
(h) A TEMPORARY TRANSFER FOR NOT MORE THAN SEVENTY-TWO HOURS. A PERSON WHO TRANSFERS A FIREARM PURSUANT TO THIS PARAGRAPH (h) MAY BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR DAMAGES PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE TRANSFEREE'S SUBSEQUENT UNLAWFUL USE OF THE FIREARM;
from the link I just posted, may be relevant to my question. I'd be interested to hear from Frank and Spats about that.
In addition to waivers, the local ranges here will not rent a gun to someone who doesn't have one reasoning that if the person is interested in that long goodnight they could do it with their own firearm.Let's also bear in mind that a range that rents guns will also usually have a renter sign a waiver of liability. There's a reason for that.
That was the original thinking when Fla enacted the first version of a waiting period back in the 80's. If you had a gun you didn't need a "cooling off" period as you already have the means to do harm so buying another gun didn't enable you to do something you couldn't before the purchase.
I have no issue with gun laws that make sense and accomplish their clear objective. I know it's probably silly to expect laws to have some degree of logic and consistency about them as most are passed to placate some group, eitherI remember that. I bought my first handgun from a dealer, and was subject to the three-day wait. I bought my second handgun, about three weeks later, from that same dealer. Since they knew (or could assume) that I already had one, I was not subject to the wait that second time. I bought four handguns that year (1987.) The third was at a gun show, and those were exempt at the time. The fourth was about an hour after I'd been issued a badge and sidearm, so I remained exempt.