Standardize or Stay Diverse?

Status
Not open for further replies.
, I am not as clear on whether she would be mindful enough to do what is necessary with either my shotgun or an AR. . .
She is greatly intimidated by anything AR based. Thus, I am not sure she would opt for that in a stress situation.
In my opinion, the AR is the ideal low-training Home Defense weapon.
- it's a long gun: hit probability is WAY up vs a sidearm.
- the hits you get are much more effective than a handgun
- you can load bullets that won't pinhole through the rest of the houses on the street but are still extremely effective
- it's low recoil vs a shotgun
- it's simple to operate: safety and trigger
- it's trivial to add a flashlight
- it provides 30 (or 28) shots. . . if you need a mag change. . .

Other than being a little louder than a shotgun, it's perfect for your non-enthusiast wife. Shoot outside with plugs and muffs, and I think she'll warm up.
 
In my opinion, the AR is the ideal low-training Home Defense weapon.
- it's a long gun: hit probability is WAY up vs a sidearm.
- the hits you get are much more effective than a handgun
- you can load bullets that won't pinhole through the rest of the houses on the street but are still extremely effective
- it's low recoil vs a shotgun
- it's simple to operate: safety and trigger
- it's trivial to add a flashlight
- it provides 30 (or 28) shots. . . if you need a mag change. . .

Other than being a little louder than a shotgun, it's perfect for your non-enthusiast wife. Shoot outside with plugs and muffs, and I think she'll warm up.

If only this were not the absolute worse time to try to buy one!
 
Over the years I have had just about every conceivable type of firearm. From shotguns, to rifles, to semi-auto's and wheel guns. Even a derringer or two.

For home protection I always fell back on a good shotgun. I have carried DA/SA's, strikers and SAO's in various flavors.

Today I have been alternating between a 1911 in either 45 or 38 Super or a manual safety (like my 1911's) striker.

With the recent general unrest I have forsaken the 1911's for the capacity of my striker guns. I like the fact that all my striker guns use the same mags too. I get a lot of versatility out of what I have invested in there.

And now I feel like I am at a crossroads in life. Times are tough and retirement is not that far off. I am thinking about downsizing and keeping just my striker guns (as they all have either a combat or range purpose), a few shotguns and maybe one rifle (either keep my 357 lever gun or trade out to an AR of some sort).

I still enjoy reloading and have a crap-ton of all forms of brass.

The though process that I am trying to vet here with all yall who may be a bit older and have gone through this is if the idea of standardizing and keeping really, really consistent with my guns, ammo and training. Or continue to keep my variable types and calibers for enjoyment down the line.

Just looking for constructive input.

I view this, in its base form, as a "to sell or not to sell" question. Unless you've got the gun used to kill Jimmy Hoffa, and paperwork to prove it, you're just not going to get that much from selling your guns. Seriously, how much will you realistically get for the guns you sell? (Look at gunbroker's completed sales for some ideas.)

Now take that figure and think about how that would help you with your retirement. What would you use that money for? Would you even have anything to show for it after you spent it? Now compare that to the utility and enjoyment you have thus far received from those guns you would sell. Do you still want to sell?

You've mentioned "standardize or diversify." If you sell off everything but 2-3 calibers, and then you can't get those calibers...then what. Thinking about standardizing for reloading? Okay. You narrow down to 3 primer sizes/types (sm pistol, sm rifle (9mm and 223) and lg rifle (pick any hunting rifle caliber) and 3 powder types. Will you always be able to get those? I already can't get the powder I need for some of my guns and primers are gone.

I'll leave you with a final, parting thought. You have already purchased all of those guns and their associated supplies (ammo, mags, etc). You bought them with dollars that were worth more than they are now. Your only cost in keeping them is an opportunity cost. (What is the next best thing you could do with the money you spent on those guns?) It cost you nothing to keep them. On the other hand, as tough times get tougher, you may need those guns and supplies, and, even if you can replace them, it will cost you more to replace them that what you gained by selling them.

I apologize for the lengthy post. "Wordiness" is a character flaw with which I am "blessed."
 
It’s better to have a few things you’re really good with than a lot of things you’re marginal with.

I say downsize and standardize. Spend the money you save in doing so, on training and ammo.

If you HAVE to ever bug out there’s only so much you can take with you. Everything else stays behind. If you don’t have to bug out ever (inshallah) why not maximize the resources you have for the 1-4 guns you enjoy the most?
Agree...NOT a collector..if I own a gun, I will shoot it, a lot. BUT with limited, fixed income, having guns with similar calibers is less expensive..PLUS I see no attraction for something 'odd', but expensive like a 300 blackout or .57 in a HG.
So..2-9mm glocks.. for CCW, HD and range
Glock 42 for CCW
Bird's Head Uberti in 38 for range fun
Mossberg MVP in 223/556 for range fun(don't hunt)
Ruger 1022...just plain fun.
 
I have a few guns that I keep more supplies on hand for, but I like variety. The way I see it is my ammunition is standardized since I always carry a 40 and as such I keep more 40 on hand. The other calibers are just there for fun and utility if I ever can’t find 40.
 
Even if I down size I will still have 9mm, 357 SIG, 38 Special/357 Magnum, 40 S&W and 45 ACP that I will shoot. I have components and brass for other calibers as well, but that I no longer own.

The concern over the cost of some rounds, like 300 Blackout, are of some concern. However, I do have a pretty substantial reloading setup so I can mitigate that some.

I think where I am right now is whether to get an AR style setup (which would be 300 BO) or just find a 9mm or 45 ACP carbine (leaning toward 45 ACP). I had one and sold it last year mainly because it was a custom setup that I was concerned about getting parts for later on. In fact I think it is now discontinued.

I am leaning toward the 300 BO due to the versatility of the round. Problem right now is availability, stuff is just sold out all over.

I started even looking at Ruger Mini 14’s....
 
https://alaskaslist.com/1/posts/9_General/63_Guns_Hunting/

As you can see the arms advertised seem to all crowd the high end of the price scale for used arms.
Used Ruger 10/22's for $260?
Glock 20 gen4 $550
Glock 29 $600
Colt 6920 M4 5.56 $2500
LMT AR-15 5.56 $2300
Taurus G2C $250

I see where they take a base model firearm and hang a bunch tactical attachments and inflate the cost that way.
The $700 SKS is nuts!
 
Yea, the best bet right now is to sell off what I don’t need any more and just hold out till prices come down. I would prefer to build a 300 BO AR Pistol.
 
Standardizing doesn't necessarily mean lack of diversity. I've "standardized" handgun cartridges: .22LR, .22WMR., .380 ACP, 9mm, .40S&W, .357 Mag, .44 Spl., .44 Mag., .45 Colt. :) I hand load the last four.
 
Standardizing doesn't necessarily mean lack of diversity.
I would agree with that.

The only caliber I have divested myself of is 7.62X39, sold my AR upper and my AK, gave away my ammo, still have dies and components.
 
Having a lot of calibers is fun until you start stocking up on ammunition. Two thousand rounds of this, three thousand of that...it's not cheap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top