.25-06 v 6.5 Swede

Status
Not open for further replies.

ExAgoradzo

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
1,531
Location
SW Idaho
Now being the owner of these two fine rifles, (please don’t shoot me...) but I don’t need both.
The Ruger M77 has some family historic value but not enough to be the deciding factor. The Sako is the ‘nicer/more expensive’ gun. Bullet technology will favor the 6.5 because of the Creedmore. The larger case capacity for the 25...

If you knew nothing else, and could only keep one (selling one rifle will provide funds for other projects...) which would you keep. What will likely happen is that the Sako will still be my lighter duty hunting rifle and the Ruger will end up collecting dust, but that doesn’t appeal to me...

thoughts?
Greg
 
I'm sure both rifles are very nice! This may sound weird but which gun is more natural to you. Comes up to your shooting position, bolt throw is automatic, safety is like other firearms you love. The accuracy of both I'm sure is acceptable and the cartridges are so similar that the advantage or disadvantages doesn't matter.
I would go with the rifle that comes up like a good bird gun does :thumbup:
 
Between the 2 cartridges 6.5X55 all the way. A 25-06 limits out with bullets around 115-120 gr. I've never felt it offered a significant advantage over a 243 with 100-105 gr bullets. Both 243 and 25-06 are combo varmint and deer cartridges but not a good choice for anything bigger.

The 6.5X55 starts with 95 gr bullets and can take bullets up to 160 gr. It has taken every animal on the planet including everything in Africa and still be an effective varmint round. It won't shoot as flat as 25-06, but with modern 140-150 gr high BC bullets will be effective at ranges far greater than 25-06 can come close to. And with modern optics and range finders a flat trajectory is no longer the advantage it once was.
 
I’d keep the Sako regardless of caliber. Fact it’s a 6.5x55 is just icing on the cake. Rugers are great rifles....but Sako they are NOT! One of the absolute best actions period! And if we are talking calibers, 6.5 Swede with the modern bullet & powder technology we have make for an effective long range round. FAR out ranging the 25-06. It was a caliber far ahead of its time. And can still hang with the best today.
 
Big .25-06 fan here. Never owned a Sako but have owned Ruger. I'm not a big Ruger fan. Between the 2 cartridges you haven't said what you use them for. In my case I would keep the Sako regardless of cartridge. But, I do favor the .25-06 over the Swede.
 
Big .25-06 fan here. Never owned a Sako but have owned Ruger. I'm not a big Ruger fan. Between the 2 cartridges you haven't said what you use them for. In my case I would keep the Sako regardless of cartridge. But, I do favor the .25-06 over the Swede.
Why the 25-06 over the other? No snark intended. Honest question.
 
6.5x55 in a good rifle for me. 120,s at 3000+ fps and 139,s at 2900+ fps with N-560 with a 24" barrel.
 
I would take the Ruger 25-06, assuming it is one of the accurate ones.
That model is out of production now, they are still making the Sako.
With 75 or 85 gr. bullets the Swede can't match the 06 velocity for shooting coyotes which means extended point blank range and more accurate quick shots.
The Ruger integral bases and solid rings are a better arrangement than the Sako ultimately. I once dropped a Ruger M77 close to four feet onto an asphalt surface, landing directly on the top of the scope. Made a gawd-awful CLACK. Leupold Vari-X1 scope. I was a wreck. Took that rifle out asap to check zero at 100 yds. Could have hit a dime.
 
I’ve never been a fan of Ruger rifles with one exception(Ruger Hawkeye African 6.5x55) and don’t care for the 25-06. I very much like the 6.5x55, have owned one for ten or so years. If the Ruger was an African 6.5x55 I’d take it over the Sako.
 
"Why the 25-06 over the other? No snark intended. Honest question."

Honest question, honest answer. I've owned and shot the .25-06 for 42 years and I'm now on the second barrel. Pretty much like Howland937 said, living in Ohio where you can't hunt bigger animals with a bottle neck cartridge the .25-06 shines. But, that's only part of it. I've gone to Canada hunting black bear with that rifle, used it for deer in FL and shot a lot of groundhogs in Ohio too. It is a very versatile cartridge in my opinion with a trajectory like a laster. In all honesty if I were going Elk hunting I wouldn't feel out of place with the .25-06 and a 120 gr premium bullet at reasonable ranges. I have a lot of faith in the cartridge and it has never let me down. Almost every animal shot with it pretty much dropped right there.

When I had Kelbly replace the worn out barrel I remember the smith asking if I wanted it chambered for another cartridge. For a split second I considered the 6.5-06 but the choice was easy after 42 years, .25-06. It just did everything I ever asked it to do.
 
You probably don't want to hear this but since no one else has said it .... I have one of each (though the 6.5 is a Mauser) and I don't let either one gather dust. Why not start saving for the next one instead? ..... out ....
Same here. There is a lot of overlap, but they’re both great rifles to have in the quiver when your next hunt may require more of ones unique abilities over the other.

Stay safe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top