Who Wants an 8mm Cartridge?

Status
Not open for further replies.

WrongHanded

Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
4,771
So the 9mm fell out of favor some decades ago and we got a 10mm, then the 10mm Short (a.k.a .40S&W). Now bullet technology has advanced to the point that 9mm can reliably pass the FBI test, and it's back in vogue.

Lower recoil, greater capacity, still expands to 150% or more of original diameter through various mediums, and goes deep enough but not too deep in ballistic gelatin.

So who's ready for an 8mm cartridge that does all that, but with even more capacity, lower recoil, and still passes the FBI penetration and expansion testing?

If such a beast came to be, would you jump on it?
 
So a 32 ACP made longer say 9mm OAL so we can chamber it easily in existing 9mm platforms. We could also up the working pressure up to say 35-40ksi maybe even 45ksi like 327 Mag. Would be an interesting if noisy little bugger.

I propose the name 0,8 cm Auto just to give it a good Euro feel and ensure it never succeeds. :rofl:
 
Dunno, 9mm fits a bore dimension used by a large number of countries all developed independently.
The real question might be--should we revisit 9mm in, say a 9x20 or 9x25 loading?

Ok, an 8x20 or 8x25 might be very cool. But, really 8mm is just another version of .32 caliber (0.315")

The other question is whether 11mm might be the thing, maybe an 11x15--although that would probably look like one of the old Webley .455 or .50 rounds with a suitable BC bullet loaded on top
 
So the 9mm fell out of favor some decades ago and we got a 10mm, then the 10mm Short (a.k.a .40S&W). Now bullet technology has advanced to the point that 9mm can reliably pass the FBI test, and it's back in vogue.

Lower recoil, greater capacity, still expands to 150% or more of original diameter through various mediums, and goes deep enough but not too deep in ballistic gelatin.

So who's ready for an 8mm cartridge that does all that, but with even more capacity, lower recoil, and still passes the FBI penetration and expansion testing?

If such a beast came to be, would you jump on it?


Like an updated 8mm Nambu?

So a 32 ACP made longer say 9mm OAL so we can chamber it easily in existing 9mm platforms. We could also up the working pressure up to say 35-40ksi maybe even 45ksi like 327 Mag. Would be an interesting if noisy little bugger.

I propose the name 0,8 cm Auto just to give it a good Euro feel and ensure it never succeeds. :rofl:


Like a 30 Luger/7.65 Parabellum?
 
So a 32 ACP made longer say 9mm OAL so we can chamber it easily in existing 9mm platforms. We could also up the working pressure up to say 35-40ksi maybe even 45ksi like 327 Mag. Would be an interesting if noisy little bugger.

I propose the name 0,8 cm Auto just to give it a good Euro feel and ensure it never succeeds. :rofl:

This is exactly my thinking, except for the name.

My reason for asking is this: We've got a lot of people who've switched to the 9mm because it now satisfies the FBI testing and is high capacity and easy to shoot. So regardless of what a new 8mm cartridge is called (or what existing cartridges we could compare it to), if it passed the FBI testing and did all the things the 9mm does better than .40, but better than the 9mm, would the 9mm fans jump on it?

Or would they come up with reasons why the 9mm is better? In a similar way to how the .40 guys have their reasons for IT over the 9mm? ;)
 
So who's ready for an 8mm cartridge that does all that, but with even more capacity, lower recoil, and still passes the FBI penetration and expansion testing

Not me. I went from 45 ACP to 9mm in 1988. I transitioned down in barrel lengths over the years since then. I feel secure because the availed 9mm ammo makes me feel secure in terms of lethality and accuracy. My old hands have arthritis that gradually gets worse, and some day I will likely have to go to a 380 for ease of racking. That is OK with me because the fluid transfer bullet cartridges from Lehigh and Underwood make 380 much more effective than JHP. So I see no need for an 8mm cartridge.

Now here is the mystical reason I will stick with 9. It is the last quantitative number in a succession of numbers: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0. Zero has no quantitative value. So 9 is the final number. I just apply that mathematical reality to create a mystical reason for 9mm being the end of my search. Duh!
 
Now here is the mystical reason I will stick with 9. It is the last quantitative number in a succession of numbers: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0. Zero has no quantitative value. So 9 is the final number. I just apply that mathematical reality to create a mystical reason for 9mm being the end of my search. Duh!

Excellent answer! :D
 
The Russian round for the Tokarev was kind of like a really hot 32, IIRC.

I thought of the French 32 long also.

I guess you would make the new cartridge plenty hot, and not the right size to fit into any old fashioned pistols.

Like others have said, it could be kind of the autoloader equivalent of 327 magnum.

That would be pretty cool. I like different kinds of 32's.
 
I’m for it. Just a tad longer than .32 ACP, and rimless. Too much longer and we can end up with problems feeding from a magazine. It’s gotta not be bottleneck. Perhaps a slight taper, but not much of that either.

8 Roth Styer looks really good, but this cartridge will die with funky diameter bullets. I’m for .312 (unless there is some other popular diameter I am overlooking) for compatibility with extant cartridges.
 
Last edited:
So, a .32 French Longue that's going about 100 fps faster and shoots an 80 grain bullet? I mean, we already have that, it's called .32 NAA. I know, it's a .380 necked down to .32, but for an autoloader, I don't think you're going to be able to get enough velocity out of a straight wall case in .32 without it being long and requiring a larger grip that many would find uncomfortable. For as great as 5.7 and 7.62 Tok are, they're long and a lot of people don't like the way the pistols they're chambered in feel.

.32 NAA tho is the same length as .380 ACP and we know how small some .380's can be. Plus, it being derived from the .380 means the same mags and bolt can be used meaning that any .380 can be converted to .32 NAA with just a barrel change.

None of this is going to happen tho, people are content with their 9's and .380's and still view those as the bare minimum with .32 being perceived as incapable for self defense except for the smallest of pistols like the Kel Tec 32.
 
No, a straight-wall not bottle neck cartridge. A bottle neck cartridge would not get us any capacity increase over 9mm in similar length magazines. We would get the performance buy running higher pressure over 30 Luger.
If after 15, 17, or 20 rounds the problem hasn't been solved, what do you think another 2 rounds is gonna solve?
 
If after 15, 17, or 20 rounds the problem hasn't been solved, what do you think another 2 rounds is gonna solve?

I admit the 22rd problem is pretty rare but clearly it exists or we would not have 30, 40, 50 rd magazines, drums, and belt fed weapons.

"Quantity has a quality all its own."

"You can never have too much ammo unless you're drowning or on fire."

"More Dakka!"
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top