It did in that case, but a shot that cuts nerves or tendons or that breaks joints can stop a person's progress.obviously it still takes a while to incapacitate without a cns hit regardless the cartridge. t
It did in that case, but a shot that cuts nerves or tendons or that breaks joints can stop a person's progress.obviously it still takes a while to incapacitate without a cns hit regardless the cartridge. t
I had a great phone conversation with the FBI agent that survived and SOLVED the "Miami Shootout".One can debate how many rounds to carry, but how many rounds one may need will remain unknown.
One may learn what did or did not suffice in one encounter, but that is for that one encounter.
After he retired, Jim Cirillo carried two double stack semi autos.He now [ retired ] carries a HIGH CAPACITY pistol with spare magazines.
or not. the cns hit is a "will stop". it is pretty obvious the attacker is high on some kind of amphetamine. you can see the "superman" look in his eyes while being shot. without the cns hit this guy could have flailed the leo with that branch for a couple more minutes.can stop
Putting one or two bullets through a lung would not be expected to cause it to collapse immediatelyCollapse a lung .. and that will literally take the wind out of a attacker
Putting on or two bullets through a lung would not be expected to cause it to collapse immediately
That is not what forensic medical experts tell us.Yep .. it’s pretty much immediate
Yeah.brain needs O2 , thats all the brain will try to do
Have you examined persons with lung puncture wounds immediately after they occurred?Im a nurse.a decade as a trauma nurse .
And even if it does collapse that's not likely to cause a immediate stop.Putting one or two bullets through a lung would not be expected to cause it to collapse immediately
Yep .. it’s pretty much immediate , brain needs O2 , thats all the brain will try to do … attackers brain switches gears … like when you throat punch someone.. their hands go to the throat…
Im a nurse.a decade as a trauma nurse ..
Based on my experience killing 30+ deer ...
I usually hit both lungs (broadside deer), animal still has about 10 seconds of voluntary action which they use to run away.
Apply that to human attacker, shoot one lung or both, attacker potentially has 10 seconds or more to continue voluntary hostile action.
Not to be macabre, but I think if I were shot in the lung by an attacker I could return fire afterward.
Yep.Huge Huge huge difference between a Deer and a person …
Yep.
But we know that a shot through a human heart can leave the person with fifteen seconds to strike. Realistically, what wo you think that a smell puncture wound in one lung would do?
One more time, have you studied the incident discussed in Post #115?
Have you studied the forensic research that tells us that a shot through a lung is not likely to effect a rapid physical stop?
Yep.
But we know that a shot through a human heart can leave the person with fifteen seconds to strike. Realistically, what wo you think that a smell puncture wound in one lung would do?
One more time, have you studied the incident discussed in Post #115?
Have you studied the forensic research that tells us that a shot through a lung is not likely to effect a rapid physical stop?
PLEASE do read my post above yoursI think it make a huge difference how much “fight” is in and individual as well as how much drugs are in their system.
Not much different than a fist fight…some guys crumble from one punch to the chest, while others take a 2X4 to the back and keep coming.
I agree with Buckeye…a lung shot is crippling and should immediately decapacitate…but the mental will to fight causes some to override the body temporarily and continue to attack.
SIMPLE = all he needs do is read the FBI breakdown of the horrific shooting that was on 1986 in Miami.
I have read ALL the documents including the autopsy Micheal Lee Platt was wounded by a 9MM round that went through his lungs and he was " supposed to be dead" at that moment.
He lived long enough to kill 2 FBI agents and wound half a dozen more.
Edmundo Mireles was the reason he did not actually drive off.
So pardon my not believing your observations in a static scrubbed room.
I did. I was typing mine when yours was posted.PLEASE do read my post above yours
I Cannot imagine why any informed person would believe that. A preponderance of the evidence says otherwise,I agree with Buckeye…a lung shot is crippling and should immediately decapacitate…
Based on my experience killing 30+ deer ...
I usually hit both lungs (broadside deer), animal still has about 10 seconds of voluntary action which they use to run away.
Apply that to human attacker, shoot one lung or both, attacker potentially has 10 seconds or more to continue voluntary hostile action.
Not to be macabre, but I think if I were shot in the lung by an attacker I could return fire afterward.
Huge Huge huge difference between a Deer and a person …
I Cannot imagine why any informed person would believe that. A preponderance of the evidence says otherwise,
"Handgun Wounding Factors and Effectiveness", published by the FBI Academy Firearms Training Unit of the DoJ tells us that a handgun bullet fired into a lung cannot be expected to reliably effect an immediate physical stop.
The reasons are expounded upon in the footnoted references, which are public information.
We have seen numerous videos here showing persons hit in the upper torso by six, eight, and twelve shots from service-caliber handguns who kept attacking.
One of them has been linked in this thread in Post #115, and the poster, who is an experienced LEO, explained what stopped the attacker.
It is difficult to miss a lung. If lung shots were effective in effecting timely stops, physical or otherwise, the outcomes of many deadly force incidents would have been different. One of those is discussed in Post #167.
This subject is covered in most defensive training courses, civilian and LEO, and it has been discussed at great length at THR over the last several years.