Something like a slightly elongated S&W “I” frame ?A 32 magnum revolver made with actual 32-sized frame and cylinder. Something in a snubby version for CC. There used to be a bazillion smaller 32's on the market. Now they're all built on 38 frames.
I would love to see an I-frame like the Terrier made with modern steel and chambered for 9mm on moonclips but with a 2.5" - 3" barrel.Something like a slightly elongated S&W “I” frame ?
On moonclips of course!?The Webley Fosbery, but in 10mm.
Browning BDM, It has the slimmest grip I've ever held on a double stacked magazine. The second is the SW 547. Its a 9mm revolver that doesn't need moon clips.
BHP full size and compact.
Came to post double action top breaks.I'd like to see full sized S&W break tops with the benefit of modern steel allowing them to offer it in magnum calibers.
Oh, did I mention at a reasonable price?
Yes, I should have added that, it's what I want.Came to post double action top breaks.
Them's Fightin' Words!!!Moon clips suck.
We must agree to disagree, good sir. To be truthful, I prefer single actions myself. No ejector star to get fouling under, no ejector rod to bend, light and compact for the cartridges generally chambered, and ergonomic as nothing else since, except a 1911 Gov’t with an arched MSH.Them's Fightin' Words!!!
But I am gentleman and will allow you to remain ignorant of just how wonderful moonclip fed revolvers are. Especially in the ongoing battle against the evil hordes of carboards silhouettes, pepper poppers, and their dread-overlord the Texas-Star. A true and noble warrior knows the moonclip feed revolver is the only proper battle implement for such a conflict.
OMG. A blast from the past. I haven't thought of them in years.my #1 item would be for Feinwerkbau to start making Remington 1863 revolvers again.