Why Plastic Cases Are a BAD Idea

Status
Not open for further replies.
I remember my dad getting a calculator when I was a kid. The whole family went to the store for the occasion, it was that big a deal. And it couldn't even perform all the functions he could do with his slide rule.
My Dad's

L8OzwpR.jpg

mine

7pASbGC.jpg

8UIpLDw.jpg

I can still use the C & D scales, can figure out the K, but that is about it. At some point, you have to leave old technology

I can still balance a check book with this, finding ribbons is the hard part

NaO2kKj.jpg
 
My Dad's

View attachment 1032859

mine

View attachment 1032860

View attachment 1032861

I can still use the C & D scales, can figure out the K, but that is about it. At some point, you have to leave old technology

I can still balance a check book with this, finding ribbons is the hard part

View attachment 1032862

Love Slide Rules, I have the two that were my fathers and I have added three more to my collection. I really want a Curta, mechanical calculator, but the price has sort of gone crazy lately. Much to the derision of my friends I did my second semester of undergrad physics with one of dad's slide rules despite having an HP 48sx calculator in my bag, still had the highest grade in the class. :D

None the less I think polymer cases have matured a lot since I first encounter them in the early oughts. I think they could make a noticeable impact on the military if the last of the shortcoming are overcome and it seem like they are being overcome. I see a place for them in the commercial market too. What I don't see is them have a dramatic impact on the brass case ammunition market. As I have said in other thread I can still buy ammunition, brass and bullets for my 105 year Webley Mark VI the likely hood of them stopping the production of brass cases in the next 100 years seems very unlikely. This fear that new technology is going to kill old products always amuses me. There are still one or two makers still making slide rules...
 
Love Slide Rules, I have the two that were my fathers and I have added three more to my collection. I really want a Curta, mechanical calculator, but the price has sort of gone crazy lately. Much to the derision of my friends I did my second semester of undergrad physics with one of dad's slide rules despite having an HP 48sx calculator in my bag, still had the highest grade in the class. :D

None the less I think polymer cases have matured a lot since I first encounter them in the early oughts. I think they could make a noticeable impact on the military if the last of the shortcoming are overcome and it seem like they are being overcome. I see a place for them in the commercial market too. What I don't see is them have a dramatic impact on the brass case ammunition market. As I have said in other thread I can still buy ammunition, brass and bullets for my 105 year Webley Mark VI the likely hood of them stopping the production of brass cases in the next 100 years seems very unlikely. This fear that new technology is going to kill old products always amuses me. There are still one or two makers still making slide rules...
You collect slide-rules?

My dad worked on the Atlas program and I still have his old slide rule. I used it my first year in college (engineering major) but it's just collecting dust now. These days I write code in obscure languages and build virtual environments. Boring stuff but it pays the bills - most of them, anyway. If you want it, send me an IM and I'll dig it out of the shed for you. I may even still have the original book that came with it. No promises on that.
 
Guys, time for me to fess up. In my original post I stated that brass has a specific heat 2X that of steel. WRONG!

Specific Heat Capacity of Metals Table Chart
Metal J/(kg-K)
Aluminum
921.096
Brass (Yellow) 401.9328
Carbon Steel 502.416

The interesting thing here is aluminum’s specific heat. Again this shows that even if a material has a higher specific heat, because of its mass density it may not carry away the same amount of heat as a part made from a denser material, e.g., plastic cases vs brass or steel cases.
 
Slightly off topic into a theorectic future but what happens if /when the military were to finally successfully make and field caseless ammo and firearms. I wonder what a single stage, turret, and progress caseless reloading press looks like for the hobbyist? Instead of crimp dies we will argue about plasticizers... :rofl:
 
Where's the square root button?

My 6th grade Dad thought it was amazing that I had learned how to extract a square root on paper.
Long forgotten.

I still have my pocket Post slide rule, the full size one likely went at The Incident.
I started college with a K&E, a pretty lavish high school graduation present from my Aunt, largely because that was what Kip Russell had. But it was stolen and I replaced it with the more up to date Post.
 
It seems like the empties will be worth less than the steel case nobody ever picks up. Are they too toxic to melt back into kids toys. Can we legally burn them to stay warm? I call it a solution in search of a problem...
 
It seems like the empties will be worth less than the steel case nobody ever picks up. Are they too toxic to melt back into kids toys. Can we legally burn them to stay warm? I call it a solution in search of a problem...

Interesting thoughts. I do understand the weight savings aspect which will allow soldiers to carry more ammo onto the battlefield, but their are other positives as well. Imagine the enemy collecting the spent brass cases after a battle and reloading them, thus giving them more ammo for the next battle. This can't currently be done with plastic cased ammo.

One negative could be what our public ranges will look like if this stuff becomes available to the public at competitive pricing. Will people bother picking it up if it has no reloading or recycling value? Most people don't bother to police their brass/steel cases where I shoot, and I just can't see them picking up their spent plastic cases either.

chris
 
Imagine the enemy collecting the spent brass cases after a battle and reloading them, thus giving them more ammo for the next battle. This can't currently be done with plastic cased ammo.

I really doubt empty brass cases were scavenged as there were much larger things laying around.

Both in Vietnam and in Iraq/Afghanistan, exploded American ordnance, was salvaged, the explosive charges re used, or just the entire shell refused, against our people. I saw a video of Afghan Taliban filling a five gallon jerry can with the explosive charge from an un exploded American bomb. They put flowers in the thing and set it up by the road side.


https://data.opendevelopmentcambodia.net//dataset/us-bombing-in-cambodia-1965-1975-

bombing_map_2.jpg

Abut 30% of American Ordnance dropped in Vietnam were duds. And I consider this a real scandal, how come the American public pays good money for contractors to make defective ammunition? Really shows the corruption of the Defense Department.

http://legaciesofwar.org/resources/books-documents/land-of-a-million-bombs/

One member of the gun club, a retired Colonel, told me he lost his leg in Vietnam due to a 105 mm artillery shell bobby trap. The American shell did not explode, the VC salvaged it, and he lost his leg. But at least the contractor made full profit making defective ordnance.
 
Last edited:
Just a thought; I have seen videos of guns run full automatic until the barrels glow (and some melt and sag). In none of these destruction videos does the action or chamber get hot enough to make the steel glow, so most of the heat is directed down the barrel. If some member has an infrared thermometer perhaps they could measure temps of brass, vs steel cases or aluminum cases or even the Shell Shock two piece nickel alloy cases? That would be interesting. I saw the above video quite a while ago, but I have never seen one of the "plastic" cases or know anyone that has, has the Armed Services dropped the experiment?...


Colt did one of those, 6 mags in, the gas tube on a M4 style rifle was red hot, another mag caught the handguard on fire, and then the barrel started drooping and a bullet exited it near the gas port.

The larger mass of the chamber area might be slowing it down, but it is opening up and gas does eject past the brass into the action on a self loader. Hence, dirty brass, whether a blow back, impingement or gas pistol. Also, handguards with ventilation, unlike manual actions.

Motorcycle tuners are known to use a grease pencil and mark down the length of exhaust pipe to "tune" the length, where it stops melting is their indication the gasses have cooled - which also affects velocity of that gas. Thats where they cut the pipe. One a firearm where the barrel is hottest would indicate the maximum burn and elevated temp of the gas residue. It would diminish after that with expansion and cooling. Look to the Thompson's location of cooling rings on the barrel, similar.

The composition of the case doesn't likely change things much at all. And not to forget, artillery and ships guns often don't use a case at all, projectile and powder bags are their thing after a certain size. Huge pieces of hot brass in a tank turret bouncing around would be an issue.

5.56 down your neck is too. Im all for a composition case - the other benefits are real, no brass scrap, policing, sale, etc altho the reloaders will get pinched in that. No roly poly under foot in urban combat if caseless, noise, and the poly casings being less reflective and colorful, too. Reduced weight is a factor, altho anyone who's studied the history of equipping troops knows that a 40% reduction in ammo weight really means a 40% increase in loaded magazines.

The LSAT and other advanced designs are also not using the case as the seal - a shuttle door which contains the chamber pressure is the one item I haven't seen pictured on line. Proprietary I guess.

Sierra is loading the stainless duplex cases and selling ammo now, I like the concept for CCW carry, less to corrode. If I see those at the range I'm nabbing them.
 
Slightly off topic into a theorectic future but what happens if /when the military were to finally successfully make and field caseless ammo and firearms. I wonder what a single stage, turret, and progress caseless reloading press looks like for the hobbyist? Instead of crimp dies we will argue about plasticizers... :rofl:
I'm considering tinkering with 3-D printed ammo. Theoretically, if you can polymerize the nitrocellulose (which has been done) into a stable, heat fluid compound, you can "print" smokeless powder onto the base of the bullet (also 3-D printed using something like Cerrosafe?) and make target loads directly. Priming would be the real trick, there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top