357 Magnum Dilemma

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually grew up with that claim as well. It was as false then as it is today.

That claim is as real then as it is now.
Forging alters the crystal structure of metal and the boundaries in the metal.
It makes it significantly stronger in one direction at a slight loss typically at 90 degrees to the crystal structure.
It is the goal of forging steel (and a few other metals).
There is a test used in forged material referred to as a 'notch test.'
A thin section has a notch made using harder material.
The edges of the notch vary depending on the direction of the metal boundaries at that point.
 
That claim is as real then as it is now.
Forging alters the crystal structure of metal and the boundaries in the metal.
It makes it significantly stronger in one direction at a slight loss typically at 90 degrees to the crystal structure.
It is the goal of forging steel (and a few other metals).
There is a test used in forged material referred to as a 'notch test.'
A thin section has a notch made using harder material.
The edges of the notch vary depending on the direction of the metal boundaries at that point.

The investment casting process won’t yield the same strength as forged but the Ruger IS beefier AND considerably stronger than the S&W forged frames. The claim is that it has to be, but it is intentionally so and well beyond the small increase otherwise needed to equal its Smith counterpart.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top