Blackpowderwarrior
Member
Hey!!! I worked on that Walker!! ( that's also the first red dot sight I had ever seen!! Lol)
Here's another view :
View attachment 1093566
Mike
Who am I to argue with innovation!
Hey!!! I worked on that Walker!! ( that's also the first red dot sight I had ever seen!! Lol)
Here's another view :
View attachment 1093566
Mike
The absolutely did convert 1851's with the original octagon barrel.The Richards conversions were only applied to the 1860. Richards-Mason conversions were applied to everything else.Well it's not exactly a fine detail. RM didn't convert 1851's. They converted 1861's so the octagonal barrel is not historically correct.
The absolutely did convert 1851's with the original octagon barrel.The Richards conversions were only applied to the 1860. Richards-Mason conversions were applied to everything else.
Aww man, that just ain't right!
Or you cold go with a Richards Mason. Not just a conversion cylinder but a full on factory build. Mine isn't historically correct but it does have a .357 bore and is chambered for .38 special.
View attachment 1093488
The revolver pictured is an Open Top.with the S lug barrel. When Colt started making conversions out of the unsold percussion guns and thousand and thousands of existing rough and finished parts they had enough barrels. As they worked through this existing inventory they finally ran low on barrels. They started making the S lug barrel that had no provision for the loading ram as these guns were made to shoot cartridges only. The 1871-72 Open Top used the same S lug style barrel and no conversion ring which included the loading gate.The loading gate on the 1871-72 Open Top is frame mounted. The era of the cartridge conversions is fascinating to me as they were built at the same time as the cartridge revolvers spanning 1869 to 1879. Between the Colt's and the Remington's there is enough variations to keep a collector busy for years.