Many can do it on a stationary target at the range. Can you do it in a surprise situation at a moving target with yourself moving and be aware of what's beyond your target? If you miss and hit an innocent bystander is it worth the price? Real life is not a video game or TV show...
Can you do it repetitively, on demand, on the stationary target at the range?
The whole point of practicing things youre not good or comfortable with, is to become good and comfortable with them, so if you might actually need to use that skill, its not your first time trying it if and when it might happen, and you know what your capabilities are.
Would I try for a moving target at 40 or 50 yards with the handgun Im carrying? Probably not (up close? totally different subject), unless I felt there was no other choice. A static target, I wouldnt have a problem with it, given the opportunity for the shot, and I would think you would probably get that opportunity at some point.
There have been a number of instances of people making longer range shots with handguns in the not so distant past, and one of the further ones that comes to mind, was something like 75 yards on a military base where there was an active shooter and the MP took that shot, with I believe a Beretta, and stopped it.
I dont have too much trouble keeping most of my hits on a photo silhouette at 50 yards or so. They may not be the nice smaller group of hits like you usually see up close, but I can keep most of them solid body hits and any hit is a good hit, as long as its not you taking it.
I understand that longer range shooting with a handgun isnt what most practice, especially since it seems that for a lot of people, the guns they choose to carry, arent going to be the best choice for trying to do it anyway.
But then again, even up close, where things are usually considered to be more likely to happen, they really arent the best choices either. How many who carry, practice more realistically with what they carry, from how they carry it, on a regular basis? From the pics Ive seen here, Im not seeing that sort of shooting and/or targets if that is "practice".
How many shoot reactively, "up close", where everything is "supposed" to happen, while drawing from how you carry your gun, moving and quickly shooting as you go, without using the sights? That is most likely how you will need to shoot, and yet, I cant remember ever seeing anyone at the range I shoot at now (not that I see a lot of people there when I shoot), shooting like that, and we are not restricted from doing it.
So, how are you getting these sorts of skills developed and honed if you aren't actually doing it in practice? Dry fire is a real big help for a lot of things, including things like presentations, etc, but will only get you so far. You still need live fire to prove it. At least those who practice in that manner and do it regularly, will likely have some of the basic skills down to do it, but how many actually do?
This is really all a lot of hard and constant work, and thats just to get to the point youre basically competent and have some proficiency. And its not just some goal you attain, maintaining it, and continuing to learn, takes even more.