Gun rag pictures

Status
Not open for further replies.

PWC

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2018
Messages
1,803
Location
Central AZ
I was in Safeway yesterday a d picked up a copy of Handloader to see if there was anything l was interested in (there wasn't). I noticed on the cover a picture of a 1911 "type" pistol with the hammer cocked and mag in. The pic showed the right side so whether the safety was on or not could not be determined.

I've never reallu paid much attention before, but I have seen this repeated in other rags and advertisements and I'net pics. Seldom with revolvers. Also seldom with rifles and only then when the cocking piece is visible, and never with a lever action.

I was taught never to lay down a cocked firearm, handgun or rifle, because it isn't safe. You may know or think you remember that it is safe, but others don't KNOW.

I think such pictires may promote an unsafe attitude. What do you folks think?
 
Do I find it a big deal? No. Never thought about the picture of a gun being dangerous with just a gun in the photo.

Now if it depicts a person displaying unsafe actions with a gun, then yes, that image pops out.

I grabbed a stack of gun mags and picked out just the ones with single action autos on the covers.

Some had cocked SA auto guns on them:

6F3F319D-FE74-4667-927C-4EB3ECCDECE4.jpeg

Some did not:

F30EBB0B-F557-49B3-BD2F-46F477CC094C.jpeg

I guess it just depends on the photo editor’s pick for the cover shot.

Stay safe.
 
Its just a picture. I dont think we need to read into this much. Next thing you know somebody will be putting warnings and disclaimers on magazine covers. Which then leads to going back and editing old films that had the hero holding a gun with his finger on the trigger Example: Magnum Force film Intro.

Before you know it we are hip deep in Idiocracy (the Movie).
 
Point is this is nothing but marketing. And the people in the marketing department at a place that makes guns, let alone some firm in New York has less then a clue as to how these gunz work.

The result is as above.

We all know what happens when you get people that have very low gun handling experience get around guns.....does the name Baldwin ring any bells. These are people that just don't know any better, so bad things happen. That bad thing could be anywhere between the rounds loaded in backwards to someone dead.

Personally if I was running the show at HK, and knowing what I know now, when I send a product out to be photographed for something it would be a non working firearm. Pretty easy, remove the striker/pin, and don't drill the barrel all the way. This way the idiots.....err people at the ad agency will not hurt anyone.
 
What makes you think that HK provided live ammo & fully functional handgun, without supervision, to the photographer?
 
Its just a picture. I dont think we need to read into this much. Next thing you know somebody will be putting warnings and disclaimers on magazine covers. Which then leads to going back and editing old films that had the hero holding a gun with his finger on the trigger Example: Magnum Force film Intro.

Before you know it we are hip deep in Idiocracy (the Movie).
LOL. We're thigh deep already. :p
 
Then one should only display photos of semiautos with the magazines removed and the slides locked back, DA revolvers with the cylinders out, SA revolvers with the cylinders out, bolt action rifles with the bolts to the rear and semiauto rifles with no magazines and an empty chamber indicator.
 
Last edited:
If I owned a SA pistol, it's unlikely I'd decock it, unless I'm outside where a gun shot would cause no alarm. Sounds like the photo depicted reality..
 
I think that you're taking this a bit too seriously than you should care for.

If none of the four rules have been broken, then nothing was violated or promotes anything other than a photo being taken.

Do you get upset at seeing an AR15 being pictured with with it's selector on fire? Would you feel the same with pistols with no safeties and striker fired that's not in it's holster? Or trying to count how many are in the cylinder of a SAA and whether or not the hammer is resting on one?

I see you're in AZ. Those same magazines with those guns cocked on the cover's are given away freely at Gunsite and they're like the mecca of where the four rules came from and is posted almost everywhere. In fact, it was COL Jeff Cooper who created them even. You can't even drive in without seeing them along the way to the school house, shop, and ranges.
 
I was taught never to lay down a cocked firearm, handgun or rifle, because it isn't safe. You may know or think you remember that it is safe, but others don't KNOW.
Who says that? If you mean /loaded/ and unattended, sure, I guess but it depends on the context a lot but cocked vs decocked is no difference I can think of.

Seems to have calmed down, but for a while the gun rag photographers were into adding lights so it looked sorta kinda like the gun was at the moment of firing as well. That didn't seem to encourage a belief that unattended firearms would fire themselves, it was just supposed to look cool.
 
I think such pictures may promote an unsafe attitude. What do you folks think?

I think people worry about silly insignificant things way more than is healthy or helpful.

It's a photo-shoot, which is a very controlled environment. Dropping the hammer before snapping the shutter isn't going to make anyone out there any safer.
 
think you missed the point. Take a look at the loaded magazine ...
Nope, I did mot missed the backwards loaded rounds. I was questioning this paragraph: "Personally if I was running the show at HK, and knowing what I know now, when I send a product out to be photographed for something it would be a non working firearm. Pretty easy, remove the striker/pin, and don't drill the barrel all the way. This way the idiots.....err people at the ad agency will not hurt anyone." I just don't like to assume things that I don't know - that's how Internet rumors start.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top