The_Quartermaster
Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2022
- Messages
- 474
You are still being redundant here.Nope. Two different things. The latter is more important: "suppressive fire" by "mag dumping" is a military tactic, unlawful. for civilians and LEO.
No further explanation needed then.What?
Redundancy and with fallacies again.We may not be paid to enforce the law, and we may not not have a sworn duty to do so, but those of us who carry for defense are limited by the same constraints regarding the use of deadly force objectives as LEO: defending ourselves and third parties when immediately necessary, using the minimum force required.
Law enforcement went to DA-only revolvers because of civil liability, (that's also ) the reason for the pull weight specifications for semi-auto service pistols). That is one reason why many civilians have done the same thing. My defensive revolvers have concealed or bobbed hammers, for good reasons. One reason is to prevent plaintiffs from being able to assert that a shooting resulted from a single-action trigger pull. The other, which is peculiar to concealed carry, is to eliminate the possibility of snagging.
Sigh...