ATF Rule 2021R8 goes into effect January 31, 2023

Status
Not open for further replies.

kje54

Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2021
Messages
1,897
Location
Duke City
New rule banning AR pistol braces is slated to begin Dec 12 this year.

https://www.masdefense.com/2021R-08-Stabilizing-Braces-s/416.htm

https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/factoring-criteria-firearms-attached-stabilizing-braces#:~:text=On June 7, 2021, the,be fired from the shoulder.”

https://www.atf.gov/file/154866/download


I'm editing this because it would appear I jumped the gun on at least what will be the final rule from ATF. Of course the date could be moved again so we're still in a holding pattern until then.
So basically take all of this with a block of salt.

Edited by Spats McGee: The final rule can be found here: https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regul...armswithattachedstabilizingbracespdf/download
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I keep seeing a lot of speculation on this. Has something been released officially today? Thanks.
 
Those links are for the proposed rule change dated June 2021. We will have to wait and see what, if any changes have been made when the final change is published.

And yes we knew this was coming and we have also discussed this in depth in many threads here too,
 
  • Like
Reactions: hso
It ain't official until the ATF publishes it on the Federal Register. Until then its speculation at best. After it is publish on the Federal Register we will have 120 days to come into compliance baring some special circumstances.
 
Those links are for the proposed rule change dated June 2021. We will have to wait and see what, if any changes have been made when the final change is published.

And yes we knew this was coming and we have also discussed this in depth in many threads here too,
I was going with this statement:

"This proposed rule change was originally set to become effective in August 2022 but has been postponed and is now set to be released as a final rule December 28, 2022. Please click the link below to read the rule."
I took it as the new rule will be released on this date. If not then that's my bad.
 
I was going with this statement:

"This proposed rule change was originally set to become effective in August 2022 but has been postponed and is now set to be released as a final rule December 28, 2022. Please click the link below to read the rule."
I took it as the new rule will be released on this date. If not then that's my bad.

I believe it is still the ATF's intention to release a pistol-brace related ruling on or about December 28 2022. But a lot has happened both with comments and several related legal cases that likely have had an impact on what the ATF will do. So the proposed ruling shared in the OP post at one time may have been the ATF intentions but so much has happened since those are no longer reliable projections for what the Dec 28 ruling may or may not contain.
 
"This proposed rule change was originally set to become effective in August 2022 but has been postponed and is now set to be released as a final rule December 28, 2022. Please click the link below to read the rule."
I took it as the new rule will be released on this date. If not then that's my bad.
The bolded statement is not from the ATF. It's from your fist link which is to MAS Defense LLC, an on-line retailer. Absent any citation by them of an official source I think this has to be considered speculation on their part.
 
The bolded statement is not from the ATF. It's from your fist link which is to MAS Defense LLC, an on-line retailer. Absent any citation by them of an official source I think this has to be considered speculation on their part.
Like I sad to another, my mistake. Sorry.
 
I believe it is still the ATF's intention to release a pistol-brace related ruling on or about December 28 2022. But a lot has happened both with comments and several related legal cases that likely have had an impact on what the ATF will do. So the proposed ruling shared in the OP post at one time may have been the ATF intentions but so much has happened since those are no longer reliable projections for what the Dec 28 ruling may or may not contain.
I'm figuring that out now, a little slow but I eventually get there....... :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcb
The only thing we know (and that is still not a sure thing) is that the ATF plans on publishing the rule change on or about 28 December 2022.

Other than that, we don't know what the final rule is since it has NOT been published yet.

All of the links that have been posted all over the internet on the proposed changes all date from June 2021.

Not trying to step on toes or upset anyone, but we have talked about this on the forum multiple times. We won't know what the actual rule change is until it is published.
 
Last edited:
The only thing we know (and that his still not a sure thing) is that the ATF plans on publishing the rule change on or about 28 December 2022.

Other than that, we don't know what the final rule is since it has NOT been published yet.

All of the links that have been posted all over the internet on the proposed changes all date from June 2021.

Not trying to step on toes or upset anyone, but we have talked about this on the forum multiple times. We won't know what the actual rule change is until it is published.
Like I've already said, I jumped the gun, my bad. Edited my OP to indicate as much.
 
The only thing we know (and that his still not a sure thing) is that the ATF plans on publishing the rule change on or about 28 December 2022.
I believe it is still the ATF's intention to release a pistol-brace related ruling on or about December 28 2022.

I have looked at the Federal Register for the proposed brace rule. It doesn't mention anything about December 28th. Other than the post on Mas Defense, I can't find anything about that date. And I am not going to go by them as a source for a rule change that is going to make millions of felons. Is there any credible source for December 28 or is it speculation from June 2021 still?
 
I have looked at the Federal Register for the proposed brace rule. It doesn't mention anything about December 28th. Other than the post on Mas Defense, I can't find anything about that date. And I am not going to go by them as a source for a rule change that is going to make millions of felons. Is there any credible source for December 28 or is it speculation from June 2021 still?

And that is why I put "and that is still not a sure thing" in parenthesis because we still do not know the official date that it will be released.

The only thing we know (and that is still not a sure thing) is that the ATF plans on publishing the rule change on or about 28 December 2022.
 
Guns & Gadgets youtube channel read this from a filing awhile back...



SAF filed a lawsuit, this is a document from that suit.

Filing starts at 1:30min
at 3:03 ''agency currently expects'' date e.g. December 2022
6:30, filing additional and mentions Dec 28, 2022...

There after this youtuber infers that, the date of 12-28-22 is when the birdie drops the egg.

Separately , I do not see how any changes can be allowed to go into force without another comment period. If it has been changed significantly. Something others have mentioned here (THR) and elsewhere.
 
Plus the fact that even if your braced pistol passes according to the Worksheet 4999, the ATF can still say it is an unregistered SBR. Pay attention to the top of the Worksheet 4999 Notes section.

4999 notes.png

Again we do not know what the final rule will be since it has NOT been released yet. All of the links for the PROPOSED rule changes are from June 2021.
 
It ain't official until the ATF publishes it on the Federal Register. Until then its speculation at best. After it is publish on the Federal Register we will have 120 days to come into compliance baring some special circumstances.

Where does this "120 days" figure come from? Can anyone provide a link to an official ATF statement that supports this?

The second link in the original post goes to the proposed rule, Factoring Criteria for Firearms With Attached "Stabilizing Braces". Section V is Options For Affected Persons - "As mentioned, ATF wants to assist affected persons or companies and is providing additional information to aid them in complying with Federal laws and regulations. Below are options for those persons that may be affected upon publication of a final rule."

Option (5) is to apply for an SBR tax stamp. Does anyone know (or have an educated guess based on past ATF experiences) if the 120 days quoted above means you have 120 days to fill out the form and send it in, and can then wait however long it takes to be approved? Presumably there will be a huge backlog and it may be many, many months before approval is granted. What is your status in the meantime? Can you still legally possess and take the gun out and shoot it, or is it in some kind of limbo?

Or do you have 120 days total to apply and get the approval, and after that you are in violation? Reason would say no because it would already be too late to do that, but reason doesn't necessarily enter into it.
 
The rulings by the ATF are not official until published in the Federal Register. I don't know if it is codified into law that it goes into effect 120 day later or that is just common practice but if you go to the Federal Register and read any of the recent ATF rulings they have all had an effective date 120 days after their published date. It might be different this time especially if they try some type of new entry into the NFA registries but no matter what they do I would still expect at least 120 days to come into compliance with whatever the new rules are, maybe longer.

ETA: This link is were we should see the new rules about braces published when they become official-> https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives-bureau
 
Last edited:
The rulings by the ATF are not official until published in the Federal Register. I don't know if it is codified into law that it goes into effect 120 day later or that is just common practice but if you go to the Federal Register and read any of the recent ATF rulings they have all had an effective date 120 days after their published date. It might be different this time especially if they try some type of new entry into the NFA registries but no matter what they do I would still expect at least 120 days to come into compliance with whatever the new rules are, maybe longer.

ETA: This link is were we should see the new rules about braces published when they become official-> https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives-bureau

Thanks for the link.

I do not understand why this thread keeps going around and around. It is so darn confusing. It would be nice if and when a actual ruling/law is made so those with pistol braces would know exactly what is going on and what to do??
 
Thanks for the link.

I do not understand why this thread keeps going around and around. It is so darn confusing. It would be nice if and when a actual ruling/law is made so those with pistol braces would know exactly what is going on and what to do??

I agree, lets get this finalized so we can do what needs to be done to be legal. I am just about out of subsonic hunting ammo for my 9-inch 300BO pistol and want to work up a new load for my 5-inch 300 BO. But I am not going to bother loading more until I am sure I am keeping them configured the way they are. Push comes to shove I go back to my 16-inch 300 BO but that takes a different load too...
 
I think this get bumped because there's a lot of people who own braces, and want a solid idea of what's going on. Nobody wants to be a felon, nobody wants to pay a fee to keep what they own, and likely 99% own a 16" rifle (or SBR) that could substitute for a serious home defense weapon.
 
New rule banning AR pistol braces...
1. The rule is not specific to AR pistols, it applies to any pistols. There are braces for other types of pistols.
2. It does not ban braces, it makes their use illegal only in certain configurations. Assuming that the rule goes into effect based on the provided worksheet, it is quite clear there will absolutely be some brace/pistol configurations that will remain legal.

Just to be clear, I'm not in favor of the new rule, nor of the GCA in general, I'm just saying that we should try to be accurate about what's going on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top