Japanese Arisaka Rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.

ShooterRuger

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
18
Location
cali
Im trying to get information on this gun, it has alot of things pressed into it. it does not however have the flower pressed into it....it has been scraped off and it seems to be modified any help or hints would be nice.
 
You'll need to provide pics.

The Mum being scraped off means it was "surrendered" rather than "captured". I'd say your Arisaka was made in Japan...beyond that...

With pics, our members here will be able to tell you quite a lot probably.
 
There's a lot to know before anybody can ID your piece.

Pica would go a long way.

The Chyrysanthimum or emperial symbol was removed for many reasons at various times.
No real definitive answer towards captured or surrendered is correct.
I have seen rifles taken in the field that were ground at the unit level.
The vast majority brought home were ground.
These things have taken on a lot more interest n the last few years after being considered worthless for a long time.

The markings on the left of the reciever will tell a lot.
 
That's right, Why, I was told that the Japanese soldier carried a small battery powered grinder in their pack. If they thought they were going to be killed of captured they would grind off the " Mum " so as not disgrace the Emperor. ( tongue in cheek )
 
arisaka rifle

im sure it has been modified cause it looks nothing like the types i saw..but there is still the arsenal mark where it is made and it has japenese writing on it and the serial number is there with 2 circles before serial number.

gun.jpg

gun1.jpg

gun2.jpg

gun3.jpg
 
Some idiot has butchered it, bolt handle has been turned (cut and weld or bent) down and stock has been changed or butchered for a "sporter" stock
 
thats what i figured o well the stuff that the leaved on it is ok atleast all the arsenal makes and serial numbers and japenese writing is still on there. any way to still be able to tell what type it is though
 
thats what i figured o well the stuff that the leaved on it is ok atleast all the arsenal makes and serial numbers and japenese writing is still on there. any way to still be able to tell what type it is though

I am no expert on these firearms by any stretch of the imagination, but I dont think you have a Type 38. Might be a Type 99. This link might be useful as well:

http://www.surplusrifle.com/arisaka/index.asp
 
its just so modified that i cannot tell what type...it still has serial number and the symbol that tells you were it was made but i dont know what the japenese writing says...hmmm what should i do...they say that alot of arisaka that were modified were done by actual U.S. soldiers..o well still got my beyond perfect condition british infield and i love jsut looking at it ha
 
that is so sweet...that symbol on your bayonet is the same symbol next to my serial number and then before it there is two circles
 
i also heard that those two circles next to the serial number also means that it may have been used at a school or for the secret police or something like that im not to sure..can i buy and original stock or should i just leave it be...i also dont know what the japanese writing means they arnt on the list for series numbers its engraved below were the flower thing should be
 
Last edited:
i also heard that those two circles next to the serial number also means that it may have been used at a school or for the secret police or something like that im not to sure..can i buy and original stock or should i just leave it be...i also dont know what the japanese writing means they arnt on the list for series numbers its engraved below were the flower thing should be

That first link I posted didnt answer those questions?

Like I said, Im no expert. If the metal has been modified, it probably wont help the value if you have the original stock.
 
An easy way to tell the Type 38 from the type 99 is that the receiver ring markings on the Type 38 run in line with the barrel, while the Type 99 markings run crossways. Also the Type 38 has two gas escape holes, the Type 99 only one.

Musick says he has a Type 38 but the picture clearly shows a Type 99 or, as the marking says, "99 Type".

The symbols beside the serial number are the manufacturer's marking and the series symbol using the kata kana "letter." This is similar to the practice of other countries in using a letter prefix, such as "A 1234" or "F98556".

Jim
 
As a general rule:The type 38 is the model of 1905 and is in 6.5 caliber. The type 99 is the model of 1938 and is in 7.7 caliber. Your rifle isn't ruined, it has just taken on a new roll.
 
An easy way to tell the Type 38 from the type 99 is that the receiver ring markings on the Type 38 run in line with the barrel, while the Type 99 markings run crossways. Also the Type 38 has two gas escape holes, the Type 99 only one.

Musick says he has a Type 38 but the picture clearly shows a Type 99 or, as the marking says, "99 Type".

DOH!

I guess that old saying is true re: good information - you get what you pay for! :p

Is that the character on top of the receiver that says 99?

Maybe, MAYBE one day I will be able to finally ID this rifle.:D
 
With all due respect to THR,this is not the best place for detailed mil-surp questions. The mi-surp experts dwell here:<http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=175&t=80981>. You may have to join to access the forums.
 
Last edited:
The symbol that looks a bit like someone kneeling on one knee is a "9". So there are two 9's ("99") and the ideogram for "Type" or "Model", hence "99 [year] Type" or "Type 99."

Note that the year designations use different systems. The Type 38 was adopted in the 38th year of the Meiji Era, which began in 1868, so the 38th year was 1906; the rifle was adopted in May, 1906. But by the time the Type 99 was adopted, the Japanese had dropped that dating system and used a date starting with the supposed foundation of the empire. By that system, 2599 was our 1939, so the Type 99 was adopted in 1939 (and the famous Japanese fighter was taken into service in 2500 (1940) as the Type Zero).

(I hope that is not too detailed for this site.)

Jim
 
Jim Keenan; your post is an exception to the norm concerning mil-surps. I trust you will agree that mil-surps aren't given the same "attention" on THR as on a mil-surp specific forum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top