Excellent post!!!!I fell for the common "knowledge" that Pachmayr rubber grips reduce perceived recoil in the late 1970s. "Ugly," I told myself, "but useful."
To my considerable surprise, rubber grips actually don't reduce perceived recoil. What's needed is a "handle," whatever it's made of, that fully fills your palm. Pachmayr grips tend to be fairly thin, and so fill only part of most palms. They're good for people with uncommonly small hands, but leave average and large palms largely unfilled. The more you spread out the area of recoil, the less of it you'll feel per square inch.
That said™, neither Smith & Wesson nor Colt factory stocks ever fit my hand well: too small at the tops, too thick at the bottoms. I've found the best results with Herrett's and Nill's. Cheap? No. Quick? No. Better? Lots!
Not to sound elitist or snobbish, but I really think that if more people actually tried real, hand-filling custom stocks, the rubber grip market would wither. I think folks migrate towards rubber grips for the reasons you mentioned, for the misconception that they absorb recoil, because they're cheap, readily available and more people are more familiar with them. Not because they are actually better.
I do believe that comfort and performance are what we were talking about. Looks are important but secondary to shooting comfort. Fit is the most important aspect. "Wood only hurts" if your grips don't fit your hand.I don't give a d@m how my handgun grips "look", as i'm only after performance!
We have a cat that looks very much like that one. He's a good cat. He was a stray that adopted us.I will take the "kitty" too~!
Dang, beat me to it! That beautiful gun cries out for a T-Grip! Perhaps a bronze one?What, no T-Grip?