Sorry folks, I'm going with the Wiki quote here...
I see lots of folks quoting a lot of theory.. I have read a few of the same books.. But I know, what I know from seeing the results up close and personal.. I worked in a VERY busy Trauma Center for 2 to 3 nights a week for about 6 years.. I also have made more than one trip to the Morgue, as well as a few pretty good crime scenes.. I also have spent my whole life shooting, and running my own terminal ballistic test..For many of which my employer footed the bill...
Fact, any projectile that enters the body at speed, any speed, does so with enough force to set up some hydraulic shock. The question is how much..
There are two ways to get this shock to increase.. One is through bullet weight and size, the other through speed..
One way to increase the hydraulic shock value it through efficient bullet design.
Most handgun bullets will not effectively open, or mushroom unless they are traveling at or above 1000 FPS,, some designs, but few, will open at 870 fps, but not reliably. The old WW 180 grain Silvertip in 45ACP comes to mind here.. and the old 146 gr FBI load for 38 Spl..
If the bullet is moving fast enough to open, this expansion takes place in milliseconds.. It is a very rapid and very violent action. It places body fluids in motion, it disrupts the central nervous system. It does destroy more flesh, but only by about 10 to 15%.. Fatalities are only about 20% higher... This hydrostatic shock, HOWEVER MINOR IT MAY BE.. is what we are looking for in a defense situation.. It causes the entire nervous system to blank out.. kind of like putting your finger in a light socket.. It will cause the attacker to loosen his grip, drop what he/she is holding, to become disoriented, much like an epileptic after a seizure.. These are the minor effects, they work to our advantage.. More on that later..
The faster a bullet moves, the more violent the expansion, the more the hydraulic shock is amplified.. The greater effect upon the body..
The draw back is shot placement, abdominal shots place the most fluid in motion, however they are the least terminal, as their are fewer vital organs in the abdomen, save the liver, but even the liver is capable of sustaining major trauma, and still be repairable..
The most effective shot placement is in the chest, or close to the spine and the central nervous system (CNS)... or the "fatal T" this is the best area for placement.. It provides the most shock transfer to the the CNS.. it also provides the most fatal results.. Why, because that is where the heart, lungs, and brain live..
Does a bullet have to move at 1000, or 2000 fps to deliver this shock... no.. a good punch in the gut from a 6 year old can take your breath away... Why? because it produces hydraulic shock... It can knock the breath out of you.. while you are trying to catch your breath, is that moment of incapacitation.. you can't do anything else except try and catch your breath..
When the body is hit by a bullet, it, to varying degrees. is doing the same thing.. and the effects can range anywhere from, a grimace and a "dang that hurt".. to immediate unconsciousness..or in a good brain stem shot, drop like a sack of potatoes..
My point being, that all bullets, handgun, and rifle will produce shockwaves within the body.. the question is how much, AND how much is enough?
Well, as stated, and known by all here that, bigger is better, AND faster is better, what is best, a debate for all time.. one that will not be settled here.. Personally I think it is a combination of both..
But for someone to say that it takes a 2000 fps projectile to create hydrostatic shock... sorry, not completely so... now a 2000 fps handgun, is a bomb, and yes it most certainly creates MORE shock.. but to say that it has to move that fast to be effective... Sorry I can't go with it..
I have seen with my own eyes, a robbery suspect shredded with Black Talons, 115 gr 9mm, probably somewhere in the 12-1300 fps range.. was the damage prolific, oh yes it was nasty. was the wound channel evident? yes, through the edema, or busing of the adjacent tissue along the wound track.. was there massive damage, no not really, no torn tissues, ruptured organs, just a lot of really red, bloody meat.. any deer hunter has seen it.. I have also seen folk hit with a 32 ACP FMJ that were just as dead.. just not near as torn up... the question is, how much fight was in them after the 1st hit... or hits..
I have seen a great many others, all bear out the same thing to one degree or another, a previous poster says the same thing, and that too, is from hospital, real world observations..
There are too many studies, to many real world experiences to show that hydraulic shock is a real deal, it happens to varying degrees with all gunshot wounds.. The degree and the effect depends upon, bullet size, bullet design, shot placement, speed, how much clothing, bone encountered.. (Secondary projectiles is whole new chapter here folks).Size of the target, Drug use, excitement or adrenaline levels.. all of it is a factor as to the immediate effectiveness of a round.
Above all, the one thing that I have learned, to an ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY... that No Two Gunshot Wounds are the same, and a bullet will never do EXACTLY the same thing twice.. But it will repeat to a degree where it's outcome can be fairly closely predicted...
But even a 22 short creates a certain amount of shock... how much effect it has depends upon it's size in relation to the target..
The whole reason that we look for ammunition that will give us the edge of this Hydraulic Shock Theory, is because we seek to cause an immediate stop the the attack, of threat.. The most effective way to do that is through good shot placement, with an effective round. One that will reliably expand.. regardless of caliber..
Good ammo, good shot placement, Caliber selection of sufficient size, speed and weight to reliably do the job.. And there are a LOT of good ones out there,, Just not that many of them move at 2000 FPS in a handgun...