Further, I think in a way Lloyd was "testing" or experimenting with that bullet. To me, that suggests he wan't very sure of the outcome. Nothing wrong with experimenting, however, if I were experimenting and it didn't work out as planned, I wouldn't make it public and blame the bullet. I'd quietly chalk it up as a lesson.
And for the record, I think a two hour search is worthy of trying pretty hard to recover the deer.
Quite honestly, Canazes9, you seem like because you've used the TSX/TTSX in your Fed 338 successfully that it means they're infallible and appropriate for every application. The title of this thread is "Strike 4 with Barnes".
Calm down Art. If you go back and re-read my post you will see that I have NOT successfully used the TTSX on game out of my 338Fed. I have worked up a load and I'm going to try it for myself. The bullet is very accurate in my rifle, I've read good reports, I'm going to try it.
2 Final points of clarification and I'm done.
1) You and many others have insisted that Lloyd picked an inappropriate bullet for the job - interestingly some become the weight is too light and therefore it must be a varmint bullet and others (like you) who somehow believe because it's an all copper bullet it is incapable of expansion and will penetrate like a dangerous game solid.
My point is that Lloyd picked a bullet for an application recommended by the bullets manufacturer - it is neither a varmint bullet, nor a dangerous game solid, but a controlled expansion premium hunting bullet designed for medium sized game such as the whitetail deer at which Lloyd shot at. Lots of products don't live up to their advertising or hype, Barnes is not the only bullet that has been accused of that - if you google bullet failure with just about any bullet on the market you will find enough reading to keep you busy for a month.
Whether or not the bullet worked well for him or not, it certainly was NOT unreasonable for him to have a reasonable expectation of success - the bullet was designed for the application he was using it, there are countless reports of success for the same bullet and the same application. He did not make a poor choice to try - a poor choice would have been varmint bullet or even one of Barnes solid designs
.
2) Point 2 - Lloyds success or failure with bullet proves nothing to anyone but Lloyd. It is not even remotely close to being statistically significant. I have no problem with Lloyd or what he wrote regarding their performance - he has lost confidence with them and won't be using them again, regardless of anyone else's opinion (I feel much the same way about the 243 for deer based on my statistically insignificant experiences with it).
I won't speculate what went wrong for Lloyd, I won't insist that he gut shot the deer or missed it - mechanical things fail. Happens all the time. The vast majority of people that use these bullets in similar applications are very pleased with their performance.
I will try them out for myself and post my findings if fortune smiles on me and I'm able to kill a deer or hog with them.
David