I have a SP101 2.25" DAO I bought when they were still fairly new. I found the trigger pretty typical when it came to "feel" for a Ruger DA revolver. (I've owned Ruger DA's in the Security/Service/Speed-Six & Redhawk lines for many years, having also been a long time shooter of Ruger SA revolvers.
)
I left the springs stock in mine and engaged in both dry-fire and live-fire to 'smooth' it out. I have a very nice Service-Six that was tuned by a well-known & respected gunsmithing company many years ago. One of the things they did was replace the standard mainspring with a lightened spring ... which I immediately replaced with the stock spring when I got it back. Despite their assurances that it ought to ignite most primers in good quality ammunition, I was using the Ruger as an off-duty weapon, not a range gun. I wanted the maximum reliability possible under any and all conditions.
The standard springs in Ruger (and S&W) revolvers may be heavy, but they're also designed to function the revolvers under what might be termed less-than-optimal conditions. (It's amazing how some owners can unintentionally 'abuse' a revolver when it comes to cleaning & maintenance, or outright abuse one.) Light springs might be fine when the gun is clean and being used under good conditions, and with ammunition carefully checked for QC and primer sensitivity.
However, I tend to use my revolvers more as firearms carried as dedicated defensive weapons, rather than as leisure, range, sporting or hunting firearms. I want them to work under 'less-than-ideal' conditions, if need be, and I want them to have the best potential chance to still ignite primers whether the hammer's freedom of movement may have been adversely affected to some degree by unexpected fouling/contaminants, or when the occasional hard primer may come along.
I discovered how my finger could eventually come to 'outrun' the trigger recovery when one of my 642's was equipped with a lighter than standard rebound slide spring. This was after a couple of even light er springs had been found to either not allow for proper trigger recovery at all (which being checked at the bench), or inconsistent trigger recovery. The lighter spring which allowed for consistent trigger recovery eventually turned out to not have enough speed to keep up with my index finger when running drills involving rapid shot strings (the more my DA revolver skills were returning after a LOT of practice, after not having carried a service revolver or an off-duty revolver for several years).
I reinstalled the factory spring and I immediately found the trigger recovery was firm, brisk and faster than I could hope to outrun with my finger.
I also couldn't figure out why I'd tried the lighter trigger in the first place ... which apparently meant that the practice I'd been doing had paid off in making the standard rebound slide spring now "feel" fine. I guess the shooter had needed the 'improvement', rather than the gun.
Sometimes spending the time and effort in 'improving' the shooter, instead of the handgun, may pay more dividends down the road ...
Just my thoughts.
The little SP101's are handy little 5-shot Magnum wheelies. I even found the stock 'squarish' grips to work out fine for my needs.
I don't use the SPO101 nearly as often (aside from range practice), since I have a number of lighter weight J-frames which better suit my desire for a pocket holster carry method. I'd rather use it when i feel like using & carrying Magnum ammunition, though, since its increased weight makes for better controllability than when shooting one of my lighter S&W's. I've even thought of ordering a standard XS dot front night sight. (I've come to
really like the XS front night sights on my pair of M&P 340's.)
Congrats on the new revolver.