Does "constructive possession" have anything to do with construction..?
I was lead to believe that it meant that you are in possession of something not in your possession...
Kinda like having a gun in your car, and being elswhere, you're still in "constructive possession".
Correct me if I'm incorrect, please.
p
Once again...
I AM NOT A LAWYER, THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE. DO NOT USE THIS AS A SANCTION FOR YOUR ACTIVITIES. RELY ON THIS AT YOUR OWN PERIL. I MAKE NO CLAIMS AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THESE STATEMENTS OF LAW AND FACT, AND THEY MAY NOT APPLY OR BE OUT OF DATE.
You're correct - constructive possession is possession that is not actual possession. For example, the difference between "I have a gun in my hand," actual possession, and "I have a gun in my car," constructive possession. Constructive possession is very fact specific, and you should always use caution, be aware of the pertinent firearms laws, the judicial interpretations in your own district, and, when in doubt, consult a qualified attorney (i.e. not me).
Here's some statements of law taken from relevant 11th circuit cases (Alabama, Georgia, Florida). I must stress that these may not be current, and may not apply to your district, and may not apply to your personal situation.
To prove constructive possession, “the government must show that the defendant exercised ownership, dominion, or control over the firearm or the [premises where] the firearm” was located. United States v. Gunn, 369 F.3d 1229, 1234 (11th Cir. 2004). In addition, “ownership is not a requirement for possession. Possession may…joint or sole.” United States v. Boffil-Rivera, 607 F.3d 736, 740 (11th Cir. 2010). “In essence, constructive possession is the ability to reduce an object to actual possession.” United States v. Gavin, 394 Fed.Appx. 643, 645 (11th Cir. 2010). (citing United States v. Martinez, 588 F.2d 495, 498 (5th Cir.1979)). Evidence of defendant’s knowledge of the firearm can be evidence demonstrating constructive possession, although knowledge alone is insufficient to sustain a conviction. United States v. Thompson, 473 F.3d 1137, 1142 (11th Cir. 2006). If the government presents legally sufficient evidence to support a finding of constructive possession, the issue should be presented to a jury or other trier of fact. Gavin, 394 Fed.Appx. 646.