Decisions, decisions...
I'm about to pull the trigger on a CMP Service Grade Garand, and I can't make my mind up between the Springfield Armory or Harrington & Richardson Arms rifle. I like the fact that the Springfield is a Springfield (just like the idea of seeing that on the receiver for some reason - guess it's more of a connection to WWII, even if it will likely be a post-war rifle), but the HRA rifles tend to be newer, and many folks report that some look almost never-fired.
This will be my first Garand and almost certainly be my only one for a long, long time, since I know CMP supplies are finite (as are my funds), and there are a lot of other firearms on my wish list before I get around to another Garand.
Anyway, does anyone have any guidance or experience with both options?
I'm about to pull the trigger on a CMP Service Grade Garand, and I can't make my mind up between the Springfield Armory or Harrington & Richardson Arms rifle. I like the fact that the Springfield is a Springfield (just like the idea of seeing that on the receiver for some reason - guess it's more of a connection to WWII, even if it will likely be a post-war rifle), but the HRA rifles tend to be newer, and many folks report that some look almost never-fired.
This will be my first Garand and almost certainly be my only one for a long, long time, since I know CMP supplies are finite (as are my funds), and there are a lot of other firearms on my wish list before I get around to another Garand.
Anyway, does anyone have any guidance or experience with both options?