.38 super or 10mm for defense?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jason41987

member
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
1,293
hey everyone.. im looking to get a 1911 for a self defense handgun.. probably 4" barrel, single-stack grip.. and well, i was wondering what would be the better choice?.. 10mm, or .38 super?...

i was looking at 10mm loads, and theyre VERY powerful, pack quite a punch.. however, .38 super ammo ive been finding doesnt seem so potent, obviously, less case capacity... but the max loads ive been finding for it are around 510fpe..

what i dont get about this, is there are some 9x19mm loads that equal about that, +P rounds of course, but the 9x19mm has a case capacity of 13 grains, the 38 super has a capacity of 18 grains with a thicker wall... so why not use one of these potent 9x19mm loads, scaled up to the size of the .38 super case which would give you a muzzle energy of 650-700FPE and still be within the limits of the case, and the pistol itself?...

thats very potent for a relatively small round.. what do you guys think? think a hot 38 super with its lighter recoil, higher ammunition capacity, and flatter shooting bullet beats out the 10 mil which does have a bit more energy, but also a lot more recoil and not as accurate?...
 
Personally I like the 10mm much better. It is much more versatile in my opinion. Anything I need to do with a 9mm bullet can be accomplished with standard 9mm rounds instead of 38 super.
 
Both rounds (nearly all, for that matter) will be plenty accurate for self-defense, and both are capable of providing more than enough power. For a 1911, keep in mind that there will be more options in .38 super than 10mm. This will likely translate into a notably higher cost firearm for the latter.

To me, neither has any cons that are real deal-breakers - go for whatever you're leaning towards.
 
Defense Against What?

Against vicious animals, where penetration in excess of that provided by most handguns is desirable, the 10MM would be the better choice.

A 12 gauge shotgun with slugs or a rifle would be far better.

If you are referring to self defense against human attackers, the ability to fire very fast--say, putting four or five shots per second on a fast moving target--is far more important than flash and boom. That indicates in favor of the 9MM or .45.

Handguns in .38-44 Heavy Duty and later, .38 Super and .357 Magnum, and still later, .40 S&W, were adopted by law enforcement organizations because of their ability to penetrate car bodies and plate glass. That ability is not needed in civilian self defense, and those cartridges actually put the shooter at a disadvantage.

It is a misconception that great penetration and the ability to blow up water jugs dramatically make for good self defense loads.
 
so why not use one of these potent 9x19mm loads, scaled up to the size of the .38 super case which would give you a muzzle energy of 650-700FPE and still be within the limits of the case, and the pistol itself?...

Because you start to blow out the case head. People were running into this with 38 Super while trying to make Major PF before the minimum was lowered. This lead to the creation of 9x23 Winchester, which is very similar in size to 38 Super but can run at much higher pressures.
 
im actually leaning towards the 38 super.. less frontal area at similar energy levels would mean deeper penetration if neccessary, and better accuracy is good to... also, i can go for a more moderate 500FPE load in the 38 super without juicing it up to +P levels, makes the brass last longer too...

i was mostly looking for a versitile defense handgun, for carry, and for camping/backpacking/fishing as well

ive also considered 9x23 winchester, though it seems .38 supers more plentiful, and easier to find brass/ammo for
 
AFAIK you will not find either caliber chambered in a 4 inch gun. You will have to have a custom gunsmith build one for you.
I would go with the 9x23 rather than .38 super, you can buy factory ammo that has the oomph you are looking for.
The first 10mm 1911s (Colt Delta Elite) suffered from cracking, I doubt a shorter barrel gun would have a longer life as it wil have less slide mass to absorb recoil and prevent frame battering.
 
oh id build it myself from parts, i have no problem with that... if i can fire .38 super in a 9x23 barrel, that seems like it would be the best option then
 
hmm.. could .38 super be fired from the 9x23mm barrel?.. if so, ill just go 9x23mm, but i cant seem to find any barrels for it... so... ream out a .38 super or 9mm barrel?
 
There is a dealer here in Australia who regularly reams .38 super barrels with a 9x23 reamer. He told me that he could then run both cartridges.
I simply bought a spare 9mm barrel to go with my .38 super barrel. No other changes required other than adjusting the extractor.
 
Some people shoot one out of a barrel made for the other, but the chamber dimensions are different so I wouldn't recommend it. Reaming a 9x19 barrel with a 9x23 reamer will work perfectly, reaming a 38 Super barrel won't do the same as the 38 Super chamber is slightly larger at the mouth. I've for a 9x23 reamer I've used to convert 9mm barrels.

Remember, 9x23 is a tapered round similar to 9x19 where 38 Super is straight walled.
 
wow.. its considerably cheaper to buy a 9x23 winchester reamer and a 9x19mm barrel than it is to buy a 9x23mm barrel
 
im looking to get a 1911 for a self defense handgun.. probably 4" barrel, single-stack grip.. and well, i was wondering what would be the better choice?.. 10mm, or .38 super?...

No. In a 4" 1911 self defense handgun, .45 acp is the way to go. 10mm is too much for the frame to sustain, and .38 super (while a fine target round in a 5" gun) might as well be a 9mm. The 1911 was designed for the .45acp, and functions best with it. Everything else is a deviation from design parameters, and require extra work to function well. When you are building up a range pistol, you can afford to deal with the issues caused by using other cartridges, but when 100% reliability is required - and stopping power is also required - the .45 acp is the cartridge of choice. It's also a pleasant gun to shoot, and ammo is widely available.

My father-in-law has recently started shooting pistols, and he bought a couple 9mms and a 45acp Commander. He'd always bring the 9mms to the range, never the Commander. One day I got him to try one of my .45s, and he was surprised at the mild recoil. The Commander was there the next trip, and now he likes it best.
 
Well, all the talk about custom work and odd barrel lengths for a 1911 aside (might want to recall the KISS principle) either cartridge will stop a human being. The 10mm with full loads is more powerful but that means it kicks harder. I recall when the 10 came out many experienced shooters objected to the harsh recoil.

I like the Super and own a couple. Mainstream factory ammo has been down graded to the old 38 ACP level in recent years. For defense I want a full load (traditionally a 130 at 1250 FPS but factory ammo in my tests now runs 1080) so either specialty ammo makers or hand loads. I load 115 JHPs at 1425 in my guns.


standard.jpg
 
115 at 1425fps sounds a lot like the 9x19mm buffalo bore load.. i guess you get the same performance without over-pressurizing the cartridge and the pistol... which is one reason the 38 super seemed attractive... getting that performance with less stress to the brass and the pistol itself
 
I have owned 1911s in .45acp, 9mm, 10mm, and .50GI. I have not yet owned a .38 Super...I may one day, but so far have not been able to justify it.

In my experience, a 9mm 1911 is...um, okay...if you want to save money on ammo. To buy a 1911 in 9mm just to save mobney on ammo? Nah.

The real advantage of any 9mm is the ability to either carry a really small light pistol, or to maximize magazine capacity. The 1911 excels at neither.

A 10mm 1911 is a fun handgun, but the recoil makes it somewhat less conducive to quick, accurate follow-up shots. At best, you gain one round over a .45acp. At worst, the recoil may shorten frame life dramatically (alternately, you can shoot 10mm "lite" load which approximate 40 S&W loads...why bother?).

Once again IMHO, the best use of a 1911 is in .45acp. There is at least one good reason that the 1911 has survived 100+ years. It is a very effective combination of platform and cartridge.

AFAIK you will not find either caliber chambered in a 4 inch gun.
DW CBOB 10mm. :)
 
cmon... 45acp just looks bigger, but the energy behind it is on par with 9x19mm and .40S&W due to being only a 21,000PSI round vs 35,000... if 45acp could operate at 35,000PSI the energy behind it would be absolutely enormous.. exceeding 10mm easily
 
besides, i was looking for somethnig that would be a great outdoor/survival pistol too, accurate enough for small game within 50 yards.. but powerful enough for a deer at 25 if desperate enough, but with more rounds to carry in case of a bear, while still being compact enough for CCW... so thats why i came up with the idea of a 4" 1911 in .38 super
 
less frontal area at similar energy levels would mean deeper penetration if neccessary,

All else being equal, yes. But you have to remember sectional density and momentum, too. The 10mm is well known for it's astonishing penetration. In point of fact, on several mediums, it penetrated deeper than my .50 AE making twice the energy.

powerful enough for a deer at 25 if desperate enough,

The 10mm is definitely the better choice for critter defense and hunting applications.

There's also the 9x25 Dillon, if you want a really wicked 9mm round. Second only to the 9mm Win Mag, and not by much.
 
If you are thinking about hunting deer-sized game with your new pistol, you better check your local game laws. !0mm Auto and (maybe) .45 ACP are probably the only legal auto-pistol calibers based on energy in many states, .38 Super almost certainly not.
 
Both calibers have their strong points and limitations and I carry both depending on the environment I'm in. Both calibers reach their potential through handloading, the Super is limited by 9mm designs such as the 124gr/GD/XTP that become unreliable in the high 1300s to low 1400s. This can be over come by loading the 357 SIG 125gr Gold Dot or the 357mag 125gr XTP at Sig and magnum velocities.

When there are large feral boar tracks on the property I'll switch my every day Super carry to either a 357mag Keith bullet or 10mm 200gr WFNs.

VihtaVuori N105 burns great in the Super and it takes the 125gr XTP to high 1400s with pressures under 33,500psi according to VihtaVuori data. For what ever reasons, the Super has been used more times against vermin than all other calibers combined and has given hammer of Thor performance every time. The longest shot taken was this past winter when a coyote changed direction and advanced upon myself and German Shepherd. Coyotes are notoriously unpredictable with dogs and I took the shot at 95 yards from a Colt 1911 Government.

Mountain lions frequented often, three separate cats with the largest having 6" wide footprints and this is the main reason I prefer the Super over the 10mm; fast recovery times for follow up times.

Take a 357mag bullet at factory 357mag velocities combined with the recoil of a G17 and one gets the opportunity to place multiple shots on fast moving vermin w/o recoil/muzzle flip obscuring the target.
 
If you are thinking about hunting deer-sized game with your new pistol, you better check your local game laws. !0mm Auto and (maybe) .45 ACP are probably the only legal auto-pistol calibers based on energy in many states, .38 Super almost certainly not.
Here in the Show Me State, any center fire firearm with a max cap no greater than 10+1 (rifle OR handgun) is eligible for use in the firearms deer season.
 
it would only be for survival hunting.. i have prefer a rifle for everything else...

seems the 10mm does have more support from ammunition manufacturers than the others.. the 38 super and 9x23 seem like they would be specifically hand loaded cartridges
 
As long as you're going to be betting, bet you life on the most powerful pistol you can reliably and consistently shoot accurately. Of course that assumes all the guns you're considering are mechanically reliable.

If that's a 38 Special, then so be it. If it's a full house 10mm or 357 Magnum or 357 Sig then choose one of them.

Noise alone never stopped anybody; a hit with .22LR (maybe several hits) is far better than a loud bang in the living room from a miss with a 44 Magnum.
 
while the 38 super is an interesting round and quite capable for defense against human attackers, id go with the 10mm because you can get low power loads from just better than .40cal up to full power 10mm and anything in between. plus i can find in my area 10mm on the shelf more readily than 38 super.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top