Kachok's Caliber Guide

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kachok

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2010
Messages
4,429
Location
Palestine TX
Many many threads on here have been dedicated to caliber selection, and yet we have alot of confusion about the proper calibers for specific applications, so I decided to create a brief guide of sorts to help clarify the tendencies of the popular calibers. Again these are the tendencies there are bullets out there that won't even work with factory barrels that can change the picture entirely but they are the rare exception not the rule that I cover here.

.17 cal. This is a caliber dedicated to blistering speed, the technical ballistics are poor but in this case the blistering speed makes up for all it's shortcomings when small furry critters are your game. NOT for use on big game not even with headshots. Few chamberings in this caliber .17 HMR is the most popular but the 17 rem and fireball reach it's true potential throwing these tiny pills at crazy speeds.

5.56mm/.22 cal. Also a "speed is king" caliber, better ballistics then the .17 but not by much, bullet selection is vastly better and even includes some bullets that are capable of taking larger game given a skilled hunter and reasonable range. Not recommended for long range shooting, only a couple bullets exist that can keep this caliber on paper at long range in a crosswind and they require and aftermarket barrel to stabilize. Kings of this caliber are the abundant 5.56x45/223 of US military fame, the omnipresent .22LR, and the blistering fast 22-250 though dozens of .22 calibers are on the market.

6mm/.243 Among the most versatile calibers for the North American hunter, it is just as comfortable slinging high speed 55 and 70gr pills at varmints as it is at knocking deer sized game down with it's 85-100gr selection, and it does both with an absolute minimum of recoil. It's external ballistics in general are head and shoulders above the .22 cals. This is a good choice for long range shooting assuming you have the tighter 1:9 twist to handle longer bullets. Surprisingly there are few chamberings of this caliber, probably because the ol .243 win pretty well has all the bases covered, though the 6mm rem and 243 WSSM have it beat for pure performance.

.250/.257 cal This is the "speed is king" caliber of the hunting world, it does not surpass the ballistics of the .243 as you would expect a larger caliber to do, but what it does do is throw light/medium weight bullet very very fast. Easly capable of taking deer sized game this is the quintessential flat shooting light kicking hunting caliber with nearly all of it's popular chamberings being capable of 3200fps+ with hunting weight bullets, and recoil only in the 10-16lbs range for sporter weight rifles. Not recommended for very long range paper punching, but for hunting ranges with superb trajectory it is premo. The most popular chamberings are the 25-06, 257 Wby mag and the absolutely fantastic 257 Roberts.

6.5mm/.264 cal This is the smallest caliber to achieve astounding external ballistics, while they can be used to throw medium weight bullets at fairly high speeds, their speciality is their long 140gr+ bullets that resist wind deflection and retain energy like a much larger caliber. Those long and heavy bullets also provide excellent penetration making the 6.5mm the smallest caliber that I would use on game larger then mule deer, and the smallest caliber to have taken every species of game on the planet to my knowledge. If someone is looking for a very light recoiling rifle capable of world class long range ballistics, and serious game getting power look no further. Popular choices in this caliber are the "quadruplets" (6.5 Creedmore, 6.5x47, 260 Rem, 6.5x55) which are all capable of nearly identical performance, the beastly .264 win mag, and the world record setting 6.5-284 which has for years been the top choice for 1,000yd matches.

.270/.277 cal. Ah yes the point where speed kings meet real ballistic performance, many naysayers downplay the .270s because the calibers right above and below it have better external ballistics, but uber high BC bullets were never the goal of the .270 it is a fantastic compromise between super speed and ballistics that just plain works in the real world. It shoots very flat and retains enough energy at range to make a clean kill on all but the largest of North American game. Combine those characteristics with the fact that the .270 win is so abundant and ammo is so inexpensive and you can see why it is so successful. Popular choices are first and foremost the original 270 win which is still as effective today as when Jack O'Connor imortolized it, and the simply amazing 270 WSM which I can tell you first hand is a spectacular hunting round. Bringing up the rear are the polar opposites, the hugely overbore .270 Wby mag and the tiny purpose built 6.8 SPC for the AR crowd.

7mm .284 cal. Much like the 6.5mm this is a spectacular example of long range performance, they simply deliver huge amounts of energy to very long ranges and resist wind deflection as well as any caliber under .338, this is also the point where recoil starts stinging for most people with it's more common chamberings. With it's long heavy 160gr+ projectiles the 7mm tend to be a deep penatrator and is a force to be reckoned with even for the largest of animals. This caliber is HIGHLY recommended for long range shooting, it is dead tied with the 6.5mm and the 7.62mm for 1,000yd supremacy. The key players in this caliber (in the states) are the powerful 7mm Rem Mag, the efficient 7mm-08, the well rounded 280 Rem, and the legendary 7x57

7.62mm 308 cal. This is THE jack of all trade calibers, it simply does it all, while most other calibers need different twist rates to use extremely high or low bullet weight the .30 cal does it all very well in their standard 1:10 only the 6.5mm with it's 1:8" can rival .30 cal versatility in this regard. From 110gr bullets at varmint rifle speeds to 240gr javelins that will bust an elephant's skull the same 1:10" twist 30-06 can do both accurately with no modification. No wounder it is the #1 hunting rifle on the planet. No arsenal is complete without a 30 cal of some variety. The .30 cal also comes in a HUGE variety of chamberings, everything from the tiny .30 carbine to such monsters as the 7.82 Warbird and probably 40 choices in between the two with the 30-30, 308 win, 30-06 and 300 Win mag/WSM probably being the most common choices and covering the middle ground nicely.

8mm/.325 Now we are talking heavy hitters, for larger game they have a clear advantage over the 30 cals, sadly much like the .35 cals they suffer from lack of bullet selection, there simply are not that many modern bullets on the market for them, hopefully the 325 WSM will breath new life into this caliber and get it fully caught up to the standards of other calibers like the 338. This is NOT a top pick for long ranged paper punching, the high BC bullet selection is slim to none, and nobody makes a special target rifle chambered in 8mm anything, not to mention the fact that the recoil is uncomfortable for most people. Chambering selection is slim, but seeing as this is truly a dedicated big game caliber all the bases are covered. 8x57 for everything up to elk, and the magnums (8mm Rem mag and 325 WSM) for bigger game or longer ranges.

338 cal. Everything the 8mm does in a slightly larger package with the added advantage of a better selection of premo bullets for multiple applications. This is the only medium bore that is fantastic for both hunting and long range shooting (assuming you are very recoil tolerate) with hunting bullets in excess of .700 BC it is in a class by itself for delivering a powerful blow out to long range. There are a full range of 338 cal chamberings as well, everything from the compact 338 Fedral to the mainstay 338 Win Mag to the remarkably powerful 338 Lapua and Ultra Mag which can drive 250gr bullets to 3000fps! Word of caution though, these things kick hard so if you are not an experienced shooter, you might want to get your feet wet on a 300 win mag before you step up to 40+lbs of recoil. I had my nose busted like that.

35 cal and 9.3mm Yes I know those are in fact two different calibers (.358 and .366) but I lumped them together since they are so close in ever aspect including the bullets available for them that it is silly to look at them any different. Neither have the ultra low drag bullets that make the 338 such a long ranged machine, but at this point that matters very little, few people hunt the game these are built for at long range anyway. Both can be had with premium heavily bonded bullets and solids of 300+gr makeing them serous contenders for the largest of game, as with all large calibers the recoil is stout, but the more mild chamberings (358 Win, 35 Whelen, 350 Rem Mag, and 9.3x62) are tolerable for most shooters in limited doses. The 358 Norma and 9.3x64 are the hotrods of the bunch and can be a bit more painful to a rookie.

375 cal. This one needs no introduction to the big game crowd, it has a place of distinction from all others, H&H correct me if I am wrong but the 375 H&H is the smallest caliber that meets all minimum standards for hunting every game animal everywhere in the world, and is well known for shooting reasonably flat unlike many other large safari cartrages. The addition of the 375 Ruger is an exciting deveopment for the fans of this fantastic caliber. The 375 has the widest selection of big bore bullets aside from the .458 with weights all the way from 200gr to a massive 375gr.

I don't have any hands on experience with anything larger then a .375 so I will leave that to some of our expernced safari guys if you want to fill in.

Feel free to agree or disagree with any of my conclusions, I have pretty thick skin. Hope this helps people with any questions people have. If I missed anything please let me know.
 
Well of course I could not cover every aspect of every bullet for those calibers, but what did you have in mind?

Yeah I did not include such classics as the .333 and .318 and probably a hundred other oddball calibers, not enough time in the day to cover them all.
 
Nothing, just the last statement I added. I'm seeing fanboys of short magnums and maybe the 7STW or some oddball such that are going to feel slighted. I think it's a good generalization of the caliber spectrum, nice, must have taken a bit of typing and thought. Well written, though. Thanks. :D
 
I would have done a whole section on the .22, simply because it is ubiquitous. But, thats just me. Not bad!
 
Yeah the .22 cal cover such a huge spectrum, all the way from a 22 short with is little more then a pellet rifle, to some crazy 4500+fps wildcats that eat barrels like they were tacos. so much has been done with those it boggles the mind. But I think my general statement pretty well covered 99% of .22 cal usage.
 
I would have separated it into rimfire and centerfire, but it's a good start.
 
I would have separated it into rimfire and centerfire, but it's a good start.
I thought about doing that, but having two paragraphs for 22 cal and two for 17 caliber would just be confusing I would think, not that my current mess is any less confusing LOL. I am trying to think in the context of centerfire rounds, but I could not bring up the .22 caliber without mentioning the .22LR since it is the most common bullet on the planet.
 
I think that the "most popular" chamberings could be separated into long action and short action. I like the fact that you make a distinction between caliber and cartridge ... a rarity.
 
Very good and informative piece, kachok. much more that i have the time & inclination to write.

A tip o' the hat to you, sir!
 
I did not go into great detail about the short mags, I did mention the 270 WSM and 300 WSM but omited the 7mm WSM because I have zero hands on experence with it.....not once, never. I have only once seen one. I like the short mags in general, scorching hot performance in a compact package....what is not to like, not that they will ever replace my time tested favorites like the 7x57, 257 Roberts, 30-06, 6.5x55 or 270 win. I think the 6.5x55 is the turning point in rifle cartrages, no matter how we try we really cannot surpass the design they came up with back in 1891, we have gone full circle and come back to the notion that short powder columns, long necks and sharp shoulder are the ideal, Paul Mauser figured that out over 120 years ago LOL The fact that the recent "revolutionary" 6.5x47 and 6.5 Creedmore are very nearly a copy of the old Sweed tells us how well that was designed :)
 
That should help a lot of people in making decisions. Hopefully they will be able to find it easily.
 
Some .204 Ruger guys are hanging their heads or shaking their fists. Nice summation though. A one page replacement for Cartridges of the World. :D
 
Good work putting that all together. If you want it to be more informational, leave out the subjectivity and include examples and data. Saying a caliber "has better ballistics than the .17, but not by much" isn't very helpful, especially given the variation in .17 ballistics, and it depends on your definition of "better"-- for some it may mean less speed/less pelt damage.

Saying the .243/6mm is the MOST versatile-- again is a matter of opinion, and your situation. Sometimes including a lot of opinion will turn off a reader that happens to disagree. State fact and back it up with data and examples. You can then frame your opinion to the reader and have it footnoted with examples you have given.

The 7mm delivers HUGE amounts of energy downrange--how much? why could it potentially matter in different scenarios? Huge relative to what other amount of energy and why the comparison?

In general an informational piece benefits from more objectivity, and less subjectivity.

Just some suggestions for tidying up. Nice work.
 
Last edited:
Hard to argue about the .243 and versatility. I know that the 55-grain bullets do well on prairie dogs, and some skilled hunters/shooters do okay for elk with 100-grain loads. That's a rather broad spectrum. :)
 
Good work putting that all together. If you want it to be more informational, leave out the subjectivity and include examples and data. Saying a caliber "has better ballistics than the .17, but not by much" isn't very helpful, especially given the variation in .17 ballistics, and it depends on your definition of "better"-- for some it may mean less speed/less pelt damage.

Saying the .243/6mm is the MOST versatile-- again is a matter of opinion, and your situation. Sometimes including a lot of opinion will turn off a reader that happens to disagree. State fact and back it up with data and examples. You can then frame your opinion to the reader and have it footnoted with examples you have given.

The 7mm delivers HUGE amounts of energy downrange--how much? why could it potentially matter in different scenarios? Huge relative to what other amount of energy and why the comparison?

In general an informational piece benefits from more objectivity, and less subjectivity.

Just some suggestions for tidying up. Nice work.
If you read the majority of the posts that I have made on technical issues I have always been very detail oriented in expressing my views, to a novice (who I really wrote this for) that techno babel can be intimidating and simply confuse the issue, so for once I went with an emotion theme rather then tech specs. Think about it, put a ballistic coefficiency relation to energy retention chart in front of someone new to rifles and you have lost him right then right there, say that it carries huge amounts of energy downrange and he gets that. I do plan on making a caliber comparison for the OCD ballistics junkies out there too, but that will take quite a bit longer to wright.
 
Nice write up. I have no source to back it up, but i have always heard the lowly .22lr has taken every game on earth up to and including the african elephant.
 
Hard to argue about the .243 and versatility. I know that the 55-grain bullets do well on prairie dogs, and some skilled hunters/shooters do okay for elk with 100-grain loads. That's a rather broad spectrum. :)
I would never be one to promote the 243 win as an elk cartrage, though some very experienced hunters have had great success with them. I have always seen the 243 as a fantastic rifle for long range varmint (better then the 22-250 IMHO) to large deer at reasonable ranges. That is a huge spectrum even if elk were out of the picture. I started deer hunting with grandma's 243 many years ago, I have yet to find anything bad to say about them.
 
The only way I'd use my .243 on elk would be if I lived among them and knew as much about them as I do about cenTex whitetail. :)

Good writeup. Oughta be helpful for less-experienced, for sure. Save it in your "My Documents" file and post it every now and then. Folks tend to not read stickies...
 
Nice write up and overview, the only thing that I might consider missing is what you consider long range as referenced in the various calibers. Thanks for taking the time in putting this together.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top