MachIVshooter
Member
Who else becomes severely annoyed by this term? We all have our pet peeves, and outsiders constantly reference guns using terms we find unfavorable (assault weapon, etc). But this one really gets me, because anyone with even the most basic understanding of the English language should realize that it is a 100% redundant (or nonsensical) term.
Shell: A (usually hard) outer covering
Casing: A (usually hard) outer covering
Seriously. Pick one. Call them shells, call them cartridge casings. But calling them shell casings is like saying "liquid water" or "adhesive glue". And taken literally, a "shell casing" would be a casing over a shell .
Unless one is referencing artillery shells shipped in a protective casing, this term has no reason for being used. It absolutely does not apply to small arms.
Shell: A (usually hard) outer covering
Casing: A (usually hard) outer covering
Seriously. Pick one. Call them shells, call them cartridge casings. But calling them shell casings is like saying "liquid water" or "adhesive glue". And taken literally, a "shell casing" would be a casing over a shell .
Unless one is referencing artillery shells shipped in a protective casing, this term has no reason for being used. It absolutely does not apply to small arms.
Last edited: