lovethosesooners
Member
I read posts often enough stating that Remington's quality has gone bad, blah blah blah that I often wonder why it's stated as often as it is.
I have 4 Remingtons that have been anything but poor quality-an '86 1100, '11 870, '11 700 CDL 30-06 and '12 750 30-06; the 700 shoots 3/4" using factory load (Hornady), fit and finish is beautiful, and love the 750.
I too have stayed away from the 700 plastic stocks, as they do seem "cheesey" to me-is it possible that many associate those stocks with the entire line? Or maybe the 770?
I've no axe to grind, as I own numerous rifles of other mfrs, just makes no sense based on my own experieince as well as some friends newer Rem's to see the claims that the quality has gone south.....
"What say you"?
I have 4 Remingtons that have been anything but poor quality-an '86 1100, '11 870, '11 700 CDL 30-06 and '12 750 30-06; the 700 shoots 3/4" using factory load (Hornady), fit and finish is beautiful, and love the 750.
I too have stayed away from the 700 plastic stocks, as they do seem "cheesey" to me-is it possible that many associate those stocks with the entire line? Or maybe the 770?
I've no axe to grind, as I own numerous rifles of other mfrs, just makes no sense based on my own experieince as well as some friends newer Rem's to see the claims that the quality has gone south.....
"What say you"?
Last edited: