As said -- same folks that started Bushy... I will add this -- I have 2 of each brand (I'm waiting on my neighbor to pick up his 2 -- I'm not a hoarder) and both Windham triggers are superior to the Bushy triggers during the travel stage. So this may be for every case but it is for the 4 that are laying on my carpet.Are these good guns. Hope so cause I got my Walmart to order me one for 799$. How long y'all thank it will take me to get it?
Are these good guns. Hope so cause I got my Walmart to order me one for 799$...
That is your personal opinion not shared by someone who's owns both. While my PSA is a fine rifle my father-in-laws Windham has no signs of having corners cut vs. the PSA. In fact, the fit and finish on the Windham as well as the trigger group are a slightly better than the PSA IMHO.Windham is average or slightly lower. It's built as a commercial grade AR so corners have been cut to meet their price range. It will work fine for most buyers but those who push a carbine hard or want attention to details may want to aim higher. PSA would be a big upgrade, they offer a milspec AR at about the same price.
Alas, right now isn't a good time to shop around for the best offerings at a certain price point. Right now that is a good price for an entry level AR.
Approved by the chart? Can you fill in more info for the lay person?Yeah...any AR not approved by the chart is a hobby gun and not for serious theater of operation. Same with sidearms, those Glocks, Wilson Combats, Smith & Wessons just aren't M9 mil spec enough for "hard use". No need for real world accounts, mil spec predicts reliability and quality from cradle to grave. Reconsider before your castle nuts fall off!
The holy grail for those who believe manganese phosphate under the front sight is critical to rifle longevity and that 1:7 is the only twist rate that can launch projectiles. "The Chart" is nothing more than a list of specific build features but often quoted. Some believe the closer a rifle comes to pattern the better it will be.
https://www.google.com/search?q=ar+15+chart&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari
Approved by the chart? Can you fill in more info for the lay person?
Thx,
B
The least of my concerns is the diameter of the buffer tube
That is your personal opinion not shared by someone who's owns both. While my PSA is a fine rifle my father-in-laws Windham has no signs of having corners cut vs. the PSA. In fact, the fit and finish on the Windham as well as the trigger group are a slightly better than the PSA IMHO...
Yes Warp, for you the professional skydiving AR carrier it will certainly make a difference. You always class up a thread with your pokes at the "insecurities" of others; clearly the only reason there could be for disinterest in the chart. Feel free to avail us of the many, many stories of busted commercial buffer tubes you've experienced in all that range time you put in whilst I sat in my basement playing couch commando. Don't forget to use those favorite phrases of yours "noob" and "hobbyist" to describe everyone who doesn't own what you prefer. Also, give us a quick round count for your hard-use AR and the misc. torture tests you've run. Let's hope this doesn't end like the last thread where you ignore facts and imply experience then insult everyone.
I'll be working on a chart for pistols, explaining how your Glock doesn't have any mil spec features to bring to the party. No traditional rifling, alloy frame, external safety, open slide, decocker and won't take standard issue GI mags. Yep, a Taurus will be Tier 1 compared to the G17. Anybody take that at face value?
mil-spec does not inherently mean a better design. There is mil-spec toilet paper, after all.