We get a lot discussion in threads about the two major shooting stances.
The word stance is a bit of a misnomer as it nominally refers to the placement of the feet. Both of the shooting platforms, in the thread title, use the same foot placement. If you are shooting with your feet placed drastically differently, you aren't really shooting from either stance...that means all you folks who are highly bladed
The difference between the Weaver and the Isosceles shooting platforms is more about arm geometry, force vectors and their diametrically opposed philosophy of recoil management.
I happened to tun across an interesting Youtube video by Ron Avery, that he made in conjunction with HaleyStrategic, that gives a good explanation of the differences and thought I'd share it for your consideration and discussion. If you aren't familiar with Ron, here is his Vita
The word stance is a bit of a misnomer as it nominally refers to the placement of the feet. Both of the shooting platforms, in the thread title, use the same foot placement. If you are shooting with your feet placed drastically differently, you aren't really shooting from either stance...that means all you folks who are highly bladed
The difference between the Weaver and the Isosceles shooting platforms is more about arm geometry, force vectors and their diametrically opposed philosophy of recoil management.
I happened to tun across an interesting Youtube video by Ron Avery, that he made in conjunction with HaleyStrategic, that gives a good explanation of the differences and thought I'd share it for your consideration and discussion. If you aren't familiar with Ron, here is his Vita