N003k
Member
I'm undertaking the thrilling activity of reading through our new law...and discovered what loops like might end up being a loophole for bullpups IF they have barrels to bring them over 30"
EDIT TO ADD: Apparently never mind, I hadn't quite gotten to the definition of a 'Forward Pistol Grip' that pretty much covers anything that lets you hold the gun two handed. If that's modified, this might be applicable, until then though, it seems it's a moot point.
Assault Rifle Definition:
(i) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least one of the following:
(I) A folding or telescoping stock;
(II) Any grip of the weapon, including a pistol grip, a thumbhole stock, or any other stock, the use of which would allow an individual to grip the weapon, resulting in any finger on the trigger hand in addition to the trigger finger being directly below any portion of the action of the weapon when firing;
(III) A forward pistol grip;
(IV) A flash suppressor; or
(V) A grenade launcher or flare launcher; or
(ii) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the ability to accept more than ten rounds; or
(iii) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than thirty inches; or
The interesting part is how II is later described...
"(3) "Action of the weapon" means the part of the firearm that loads, fires and ejects a cartridge, which part includes, but is not limited to, the upper and lower receiver, charging handle, forward assist, magazine release and shell deflector;"
All of that is in Section 25 of the bill. It sounds like as long as the bullpup is at least 30" (The FS2000 is 29.29" stock, slightly extended "Muzzle break" should bring it over easily.) It seems like it should be legal...after all, the grip ISN'T directly below what they define as the action. Am I wrong here? Crazy? Desperate?
EDIT TO ADD: Apparently never mind, I hadn't quite gotten to the definition of a 'Forward Pistol Grip' that pretty much covers anything that lets you hold the gun two handed. If that's modified, this might be applicable, until then though, it seems it's a moot point.
Assault Rifle Definition:
(i) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least one of the following:
(I) A folding or telescoping stock;
(II) Any grip of the weapon, including a pistol grip, a thumbhole stock, or any other stock, the use of which would allow an individual to grip the weapon, resulting in any finger on the trigger hand in addition to the trigger finger being directly below any portion of the action of the weapon when firing;
(III) A forward pistol grip;
(IV) A flash suppressor; or
(V) A grenade launcher or flare launcher; or
(ii) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the ability to accept more than ten rounds; or
(iii) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than thirty inches; or
The interesting part is how II is later described...
"(3) "Action of the weapon" means the part of the firearm that loads, fires and ejects a cartridge, which part includes, but is not limited to, the upper and lower receiver, charging handle, forward assist, magazine release and shell deflector;"
All of that is in Section 25 of the bill. It sounds like as long as the bullpup is at least 30" (The FS2000 is 29.29" stock, slightly extended "Muzzle break" should bring it over easily.) It seems like it should be legal...after all, the grip ISN'T directly below what they define as the action. Am I wrong here? Crazy? Desperate?
Last edited: