It also would seem to be artificial market manipulation to buy up available stocks to resell at higher prices. I don't believe it's exactly simple supply and demand at that point.
Actually, what WalMart is doing is refusing to follow market trends by moving their price point upward. That is part of a strategy to get/keep people hooked on the idea that they are the smart shoppers' choice for best value, when in reality, they are selling below value (at a loss, compared to the market price) to artificially influence folks to visit their stores as loyal customers who purchase a lot more than just ammo there.
That's their right, of course, and it isn't GOVERNMENT manipulation, so again, it's ok. Because it's ammo, and some of us benefit from it, no worries.
Socialism is not a bad thing. ... In the United States, we are operate under elements of socialism and capitalism and it works.
Look, we really can't go down that track any further though. As long as we can keep this focused on ammo, it can live. If we go off on economic theory in the broader sense, it will be closed.
Those who cannot pay the price for a commodity must be provided with it at the expense (or denial of service to) others.
Denied? Nobody is being denied of anything here. Since when is buying ammo a right? It is just Walmart being reasonable by not allowing one small group of people take advantage of the majority.
Someone shows up with fresh green money, product is in the store, and WM will say, "No, we aren't selling to you." I'd call that a denial. You can call it Shirley if it makes you happy.
Not everyone here has the time to sit around at 5 in the morning and wait to buy a box of ammo...
Right! Just like not everyone has $100 for a brick of .22s, etc. But those who will put out the effort or expend the money should not be fettered by artificial controls that say, "
oooh, none for you."
... before the greedy few snatch them up to gouge and hoard.
Or shoot them, or eat them, or plant them in the garden and hope they grow? Who cares WHY they're buying? They have money, the store has product. If WalMart actually CARES that the ammo might be resold, the logical thing to do would be to set the price along the current market lines so that the incentive to resell is not there.
Of course, WalMart wants to influence people and get them hooked on the idea that they're the value choice -- even if they'll have empty shelves, or turn around and say "
No ammo for YOU! ...But while you're here, why not buy a TV???"
If anything it is strongly socialist to think that we can force Walmart to put it all out in the morning and not allow them to randomly put the ammo on their shelves when they see fit. They are a privately owned and nobody should be able to tell them when, why and where they can stock their shelves.
Oh, sure, there shouldn't be a law about it. If they feel that this little bit of shopper manipulation brings them more money in the end, they should go for it.