I want some honest opinions about 1911s. This post is not necessarily about one brand being better than the other. I jumped into the 1911 world about five years ago. I started with a Smith & Wesson. It was okay, but I wanted something more. I traded in on a colt xse stainless. I liked the colt but hated the matte rounds on the stainless. I sent it to Jim Garthwaite and he did a thourough look over, replaced MIM parts (I dont know if that is really that important), did a trigger job, reliability tuning, and bead blasted the entire gun. He did a fabulous job and the colt will fire anything everytime. I knew from the onset it wouldn't be a target gun because he basically tuned it for a reliable defensive piece and I didn't ask him to make it more accurate.
A while later I picked up a Springfield Loaded. It was a fine gun but it didn't do anything the colt didn't do and I ended up selling it. I then purchased a Dan Wesson Valor in SS. It was one of the post 2010 models. The gun was as reliable as the colt, shot very tight groups, and was nice, tight, and the slide racked like a thing of beauty. It was definitely a step up from the colt and Springfield. This is where my question begins.
I sold the Dan Wesson and bought a Les Baer Concept IV. It shoots very accurate but had a few feeding issues during the break in period. It runs well now. However, I can't say that it does anything better than the Dan Wesson did, and the Dan Wesson was a more refined gun with more options. I have considered selling the Baer and saving for a Wilson Protector. However, I'm starting to wonder if there is a point of diminishing returns on your money once you go above the Wesson. When I bought my Baer my friend bought a stainless Ed Brown SF. His gun is beautiful but he is having rust issues. That is the only personal experience I know about Ed Brown Guns. Outside of looks his doesn't perform any better than the Wesson or Baer. I've never had the opportunity to shoot a Wilson, so I can't speak for them. I have seen one of the new Valors with the Duty Coat and it is simply stunning. I'm wondering if I am really getting my moneys worth to throw out 3200 for a Wilson or if I will have just as nice of a gun spending almost half of that and going with the Black Valor.
Right now I just have two 1911s. The colt I will never part with and the Baer
A while later I picked up a Springfield Loaded. It was a fine gun but it didn't do anything the colt didn't do and I ended up selling it. I then purchased a Dan Wesson Valor in SS. It was one of the post 2010 models. The gun was as reliable as the colt, shot very tight groups, and was nice, tight, and the slide racked like a thing of beauty. It was definitely a step up from the colt and Springfield. This is where my question begins.
I sold the Dan Wesson and bought a Les Baer Concept IV. It shoots very accurate but had a few feeding issues during the break in period. It runs well now. However, I can't say that it does anything better than the Dan Wesson did, and the Dan Wesson was a more refined gun with more options. I have considered selling the Baer and saving for a Wilson Protector. However, I'm starting to wonder if there is a point of diminishing returns on your money once you go above the Wesson. When I bought my Baer my friend bought a stainless Ed Brown SF. His gun is beautiful but he is having rust issues. That is the only personal experience I know about Ed Brown Guns. Outside of looks his doesn't perform any better than the Wesson or Baer. I've never had the opportunity to shoot a Wilson, so I can't speak for them. I have seen one of the new Valors with the Duty Coat and it is simply stunning. I'm wondering if I am really getting my moneys worth to throw out 3200 for a Wilson or if I will have just as nice of a gun spending almost half of that and going with the Black Valor.
Right now I just have two 1911s. The colt I will never part with and the Baer