It's not worth the effort. The bill had serious flaws. You can't send the Sheriff out when the BATF is making a valid arrest.
The bill served it's political purpose. What you see are responsible Republicans not wanting to load the Attorney General with a Federal lawsuit, especially when he spelled out the critical areas that it would fail in court. Like it or not, we don't pass bad laws, and then claim we can fix it later in the next session.
The other party does that, we heard it from a certain NY governor, I believe. What NY got fixed was what they wanted, to get it strengthened from a legal challenge. Let them blow the taxpayer's money in court for years. We don't need it.
It was an In Your Face response to the government gun grab, not really a big problem in this state. I'm not holding it against a rep if he voted against it. Now, the tax decrease, that's a much bigger issue. Like was said in the paper today, we are coming back next session, and the opposition will get to see things again - even more carefully spelled out. Their objections won't exist in the next legislation.
