Not sure why some people oppose having more viable options on the market.
eldon519 said:I'd be interested if they made a single-stack, subcompact 9mm
D1N0 said:Well, here's the info I received today.
The 41 will be the long slide 45 ACP & the 42 is a double stack .380 auto, which we've already placed orders on.
This information is 100% correct. Those will be the next 2 Glocks.
Oh booo! A double-stack .380? That hardly makes any sense to me.Here's the buzz from glocktalk - http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?p=20774274#_
And this link was posted for G41 - http://www.sportsmans-depot.com/products/GLOCK-41-GEN-4-45ACP-5.3-AS-13RD-GLOCK-PG4130103.html
So Glock 41 looks to be Gen4 45ACP and 5.3" barrel with 13 round magazine.
Also, this link was posted for G42 - http://www.sportsmans-depot.com/products/GLOCK--GLOCK-UI4250201.html
True, but in today's market I find it very hard to believe that a double-stack .380 would out sell a single stack 9mm or .380. I mean a double-stack .380....is that supposed to be a pocket pistol?Well not what I would have liked, but I bet both products will sell just fine. Maybe next year!
Yes the G25 and G28 are both .380 but not available in the U.S. for some reason.Isn't the Glock 25 already a double stack .380?
you a hundreds of thousands of other people, myself included.I would have preferred a G26 sized single stack 9mm. Oh well, maybe next time
Now that Glock manufactures pistols in the USA, .380 G42 would not be subject to importation laws/restrictions.Captains1911 said:G25 and G28 are both .380 but not available in the U.S. for some reason.