Recent content by DA_BULLS

I guess, except for my Taurus PT917C over the Beretta 92FS, I would rather have the original. Why get a copy of a CZ when you can get the CZ? And EAA does not have a clue about customer service or even how to spell it!

The .40 version of the P-01 is called the P-06...Same great gun, but I much rather have the 9mm...It's the one that passed all the torture testing by CZ & NATO

I would much rather have the Glock Factory Sights.

Thats a nice one.

I'm sorry, I would consider it rude for a friend to give me a jennings, or bryco, or hi point or lorcin etc...

Taurus PT917 C

The Firestorm 1911 45 is what used to be LLama from Spain

Come on guys, a 9mm is not a heavy recoil round no matter what you shoot it in.

I bought one, shot it, it failed to funtion with ball ammo in a way that I considered to be what a $1000 gun should and sold it, and to quote the Raven, "NEVERMORE"

A new Walther P38 mag is over $50..CDNN has S&W 6906's with 1 HC mag that are new for $399..

I bought my Taurus PT917C rather than a Beretta because they (Beretta) did not offer a similar product. I don't care for a lot of the Taurus line, but the 92 variations are first rate and seldom is seen anything bad about them. I'm not wild about their polymer lines of pistols. I for one...

A Taurus PT917C

However, Thunder 45 is NOT A 1911 design...I have not heard of a Bersa 1911, but I guess it's possible.

Target and concealed carry guns are usually different guns. The Bersa's are a good inexpensive brand. The Taurus line of the various 92 versions are a good semi auto..Not impressed with their polymer models..92 is proven design, just not real small..I love my PT917C, but it's not small by any...

The HK version of the m16 mag is supposed to be the Mac-Daddy...