Recent content by DJAteOhAte

That's what I'm doing. I just bought a 7.62x39 Saiga a couple of weeks ago. I plan to convert it to pistol grip configuration and add the bullet guide to accept standard AK magazines. For $350, you get this: $130 in parts and two hours time gets you this:

In GA, yes. Members of the military do not need a license to carry in GA, 21 or not. They are also exempt from almost all the off limits places. See OCGA 16-11-130 If you come to GA, enjoy your super-citizen status and super-rights.

From the latest GCO email update:

9mm rimfire shotgun. The cartridges look like this:

I've always found that a couple of cool Schlitzes improves my shooting immensely.

First, there was no "church bill" this year, unless you count HB915 which was the "everything bill" that didn't make it out of committee. Georgia still has more places off limits than any other state. Second, there is NO exception to 16-11-127 for "written permission." It is illegal for mere...

Yes. There is only one license in GA. A GFL is required to carry openly or concealed. See these pages for more info: GFL info: http://www.georgiapacking.org/gfl.php GA gun laws "In Plain English": http://www.georgiapacking.org/law.php

Actually, there isn’t. There is only airport “policy.” A policy that is not only illegal, it is ephemeral. It is not published anywhere but on signs at the airport and in the heads of those who made it up. To be fair, that is the way it has been reported in the media, both locally and...

Damn, why didn't GCO's attorneys think of that?

Given the things that the judge is reported to have said during the trial, the outlook at this level is not good. However, Shoob is one of the most left-wing and oft-overturned judges in the circuit. When this goes to appeal, and it looks like it very well could, things will improve. Also...

The court is already receiving motions, reviewing evidence and holding hearings. It seems pretty clear that there isn't a jurisdictional issue at this point. If you read the documents that have been filed so far, the issue of jurisdiction is pretty clear.

Section 1983 and 4th Amendment cases go to Federal court.

^^^ Exactly. Thus, GCO sued the City because threatening to arrest people for perfectly legal activity is a violation of their civil rights.

The City (who would do the arresting and prosecuting) claim that the new law legalizing carry on “public transportation” does not apply to airports and people carrying at the airport would be prosecuted for carrying at a “public gathering”, the definition of which includes publicly owned and...

This was posted by the President of GCO on another forum: This was posted by a member of GCO who is a criminal defense attorney and was present at the hearing: