Recent content by JayBird

I agree. Harry Reid has drawn his line in the sand. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/22/its-background-checks-or-bust-for-gun-control-advocates/ It is NOW time for us to draw OUR line in the sand. Send emails to your Senators and to Harry Reid expressing that we will...

Of course there is a need for people to take some type of gun safety class. I am all for that. As long as it is not required to do so to purchase a gun. As that would be an infringement.

Oh, it is even better. It sounds like Schumer is going to submit his same ole same ole 'background check' bill. And that not even Manchin will support it...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uMV1hNXt1JM This was put together by CURE. http://cureprotectingfreedom.org/neveragain/ That is the message that needs to get out.

Why if this wasnt the high road, I would actually directly respond to this with my unfiltered response. But since it is the high road, I will simply say that I disagree very strongly with your statement. :banghead: On the OP, I would certainly say that Brady is an anti-civil rights group...

+1 on that. I am going to take the stance that your sons safety is your responsibility. Start with the eddie eagle program. Four is about the age this can and should be started anyways(although younger is fine too), even if you own no firearms. Again, I cant stress that enough. Teach...

It could be a weak case, or it could be the cartridge not being supported enough while chambered. You say that you never had a problem with the firearm in question before, so I would lean towards a bad case in a batch. But I would still be kinda leery shooting that gun after seeing that...

I guess I have been lucky. As I think I have only bought 2 guns that were brand new. Heck, I own quite a few firearms that are older than me, so....it would be impossible for me to have acquired them new. As far as firearms that I could buy either new or used...it depends on the...

If the mods want to move my thread into here, it is okay by me. http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=704669 It details what I would say the strategy they are using is. ie, it is enforcement.

Well, we have all been wondering what the house will do if anything passes the Senate. It appears that at least certain GOP members of the House judiciary committee are banding together. Letters signed by them, sent to Obama and Holder detailing the lack of enforcement on existing laws...

A 10% tax to fund gun buyback programs... :scrutiny: All I can say is wow. I know it is hard enough being a gun owner out in California, but they are just drooling out there to restrict civil rights.

I once watched something by the young turks, and could not eat lunch that day as the bile in my throat get bubbling up. Since then, I have learned my lesson, and no longer will watch anything produced by these fools.

This is the number that is typically thrown around. And it lines up pretty close to past statistics about 10-15 years ago adding in 'new gun sales' for the past 10-15 years. I personally think 10 is too high for an average. Many people only have one. I would put the number of individual...

Oh. Your own maybe selling you all out. http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020389406_backgroundcheckxml.html

Well shooting into the air first maybe the 'new' thing to do.....that is if you are trying to take out the government drones flying over your head. ;)