lysanderxiii's Recent Activity

  1. lysanderxiii replied to the thread Why A 1911??.

    The correct answer is : Because . . .

    May 11, 2021 at 9:43 PM
  2. lysanderxiii replied to the thread Winchester 9mm 124 FMJ Nato Specs?".

    STANAG 4090 - Small Arms Ammunition (9 mm Parabellum): Bullet Mass and Energy 4. The mass of all bullets shall be within the limits 7.0...

    May 10, 2021 at 8:57 PM
  3. lysanderxiii replied to the thread ATF proposed 80% rule and receiver definition is up....

    No, because there is a legal definition of a "firearm" and these do not fit that definition. If they want to move the bar, move it...

    May 9, 2021 at 2:10 PM
  4. lysanderxiii replied to the thread ATF proposed 80% rule and receiver definition is up....

    What is the legal definition of "80% receiver"? In order for something to be "legally defined" requires that legislation be passed that...

    May 9, 2021 at 1:51 PM
  5. lysanderxiii replied to the thread ATF proposed 80% rule and receiver definition is up....

    Define "80%", and define "kit". These are not currently defined in any legislation, and therefore can mean a block of aluminum or two...

    May 9, 2021 at 11:38 AM
  6. lysanderxiii attached a file to the thread ATF proposed 80% rule and receiver definition is up....

    The letter of the law is the law, enforcement agencies do not have the right to "interpret" the laws as they see fit. The reason speed...

    BBa18Gc.png OBXQhg0.png YO9NEdQ.png zlgCRcj.png risCllW.png May 8, 2021 at 11:46 PM
  7. lysanderxiii replied to the thread ATF proposed 80% rule and receiver definition is up....

    By this logic, aftermarket performance car parts should be banned. More attempts at injuries to LOEs, and probably injuries and...

    May 8, 2021 at 11:05 PM
  8. lysanderxiii replied to the thread ATF proposed 80% rule and receiver definition is up....

    As to the whole bump-stock debate. For those that stated the revised rules are correct, when do we start paying the $200 tax stamp and...

    May 8, 2021 at 5:05 PM
  9. lysanderxiii attached a file to the thread ATF proposed 80% rule and receiver definition is up....

    [ATTACH] At what point do we start to regulate staple guns and oil filters? And according to that paper, This should be serialized:...

    bf62e90a22b8f257510a630801d185b0.jpg 8876.jpg May 8, 2021 at 5:00 PM
  10. lysanderxiii replied to the thread .223 Wylde and a load of malarkey?.

    The correct way to do it would be the shoot a few dozen groups with a .223 chamber, then ream the throat to Wylde dimensions and shoot a...

    May 8, 2021 at 8:26 AM
  11. lysanderxiii replied to the thread Squad level MGs, now and then.

    That's because of worn out parts. None of ours had safety ware on the grip.

    May 7, 2021 at 7:03 AM
  12. lysanderxiii replied to the thread Squad level MGs, now and then.

    The main use of the C-rat can was in the helicopter when you did not use the feed chute. Reloading an M60 (or anything that has a feed...

    May 6, 2021 at 11:43 AM
  13. lysanderxiii replied to the thread Squad level MGs, now and then.

    The M240G, the infantry MG wasn't introduced until around 2003 (?. plus or minus a year), the Army followed suit a year or so later....

    May 6, 2021 at 11:21 AM
  14. lysanderxiii replied to the thread Squad level MGs, now and then.

    Not quite. The UK never was in a partnership with the US to develop a new tank. The MBT-70 was a US-German venture to replace the M60...

    May 6, 2021 at 11:10 AM
  15. lysanderxiii replied to the thread Squad level MGs, now and then.

    The M60 was not "chosen for adoption over the MAG-58". There never was a competition when the M60 was developed, The Army simply told...

    May 5, 2021
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice