Recent content by NeenachGuy

I voted "no." Poaching is not justifiable, unless you're talking about poaching an egg. :-)

I don't trust the state government and they don't trust me. Maybe some day they'll get around to loosening up some of the restrictions we have out here in CA.... Or, I'll work up the gumption to go live somewheres else.

Good deal! I have 20 acres out behind the house, but it's all flat :( Thought about putting up a berm with my tractor, but that's gonna take some work and planning, I guess. It's nice you have some hills on your place for a backdrop. Nice container, too!

IANAL, but my $.02 is that if he's not handling any firearms, he would not have them in his possession, so he should be OK, as far as the firearms goes. Probably the best advice is to ask him, as he should be familiar with the terms of his parole.

As proper safety precautions are followed, such as storing the nuclear weapon unarmed, preferably with the detonator in a separate location, and always keeping the nuclear weapon pointed in a safe direction at all times, I don't see anything wrong with it, providing that special provisions about...

Sometimes the definition of a "loaded" firearm changes depending where you are. For example:

Got a new 336W today! Just picked up my new Marlin 336W tonight on the way home from work. Sure, you can get superior ballistics in a bolt action, and there is merit to that argument. Putting aside the "because I like it" and "slice of history" and "Duke" factors (not an easy thing to...

here's a good 3-minute video showing how to skin a coyote, pretty much as GCW5 described, but this guy uses a hammer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvzdRTVa3Oo

We live on a big property in the high desert; we know when someone is approaching the house from about a mile away. The rifle gives me better range than a handgun, and I think the rifle does better at keeping people out of the house (and the property) than a handgun would do.