Recent content by RockyTop

I showed mine at the voting precinct last Nov. when asked for ID. The lady only said that it was the first time she'd seen one of those.

I don't see any reason in spending more than necessary and I've found that I almost always get a significantly better deal buying online or at a gunshow than I do at my LGS. I know some areas are different but where I live this has been the case. For example, last week I bought a new SW M&P 15...

Nothing. If what I have isn't grandfathered in, they'll have to try and come and get it.

Smith & Wesson 15 Sport .556

Went to gun show in Salem, VA today. DPMS Oracle .223 .... $749 M&P15 Sport .223....$999 Still a no go at these prices for me....wait continues.

In a canoe :D

I'd like to know who is doing the polls, where the poll is being conducted and most importantly, the exact question(s) being asked. Are they specifically asking if you want a Universal Background Check? or is it just a generic "Are you in favor of having background checks?" Right now there...

Piers came back for more and Nugent kicked his arse again.

Interesting. I'm actually looking for a wife for one of my guns.

Scarborough is just another liberal on MSNBC. I don't take anything any of them on that networks says seriously.

Sure he does...probably has a skeet mounted in the Oval Office too.

McCarthy talking about duck and deer hunting....as if that's relevant to our rights.

2nd Amendment wasn't about hunting or sporting. This bill is unconstitutional.

Senate panel kills gun show loophole bill January 23, 2013 - 05:30 pm RICHMOND, Va. (AP) - A Virginia Senate committee has killed legislation to close Virginia's so-called "gun show loophole." The Courts of Justice Committee voted 8-7 to reject the bill Wednesday. Last week, the...

My answer is the 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs. If it ever evolves into the Bill of Needs then I'll let people know. The need argument is totally irrelevant.