BSA1
member
I was examining my new to me Makarov and found the safety to be somewhat different than American designed guns.
With the Makarov when the thumb safety on the slide is pushed on the entire gun locks up. The trigger, hammer and slide are locked and can not be operated. This certainly reflects a different attitude about the purpose of the manual safety.
Then I got to thinking about a couple of other guns I have.
The CZ-82 has what I consider to be novel action. You can carry it cocked and locked like the 1911 or in the traditional DA/SA mode common on many semi-autos made today. It settles the SA vs. DA/SA argument with one design.
Then I looked at my MN 91/30 safety. It has a large knob on the back of the bolt that the user pulls, turns and then releases with slot on the bolt safety engaging the side of the receiver. Crude but very simple design except the spring on that dang safety is so strong I can hardly pull the it back.
I'm curious to about some other features on firearms that THR members have found interesting or unusual (not common)?
With the Makarov when the thumb safety on the slide is pushed on the entire gun locks up. The trigger, hammer and slide are locked and can not be operated. This certainly reflects a different attitude about the purpose of the manual safety.
Then I got to thinking about a couple of other guns I have.
The CZ-82 has what I consider to be novel action. You can carry it cocked and locked like the 1911 or in the traditional DA/SA mode common on many semi-autos made today. It settles the SA vs. DA/SA argument with one design.
Then I looked at my MN 91/30 safety. It has a large knob on the back of the bolt that the user pulls, turns and then releases with slot on the bolt safety engaging the side of the receiver. Crude but very simple design except the spring on that dang safety is so strong I can hardly pull the it back.
I'm curious to about some other features on firearms that THR members have found interesting or unusual (not common)?