Something between 7.62x39 and .308

Status
Not open for further replies.

Newtosavage

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
2,918
I am a little surprised that there really isn't much available in a .30 caliber round between these two.

I gladly use the 7.62x39 for pliking/range gun and deer/hogs inside 200 yards, but find the .308 to be somewhat excessive for deer sized game inside of 300 yards. In fact, I usually load my .308 down using H4895 to "30-30" power for two reasons - 1) to reduce recoil, and 2) because even at 2400 fps with a 150 grain bullet, it's still more than enough for deer at 300 yards.

I also own the venerable 30-30 which might seem to be the obvious answer to my question, but it's not available in a bolt-action rifle.

Is there something out there I'm missing? Seems there is a gap in the .30 cal. range for "deer" sized game in a bolt gun. This surprises me since the 30-30 has been around so long, I would have thought it might have been duplicated in a rimless bolt action round by now.

I feel that a .30 caliber, 150-grain bullet traveling about 2400 fps. is ideal for deer hunting. Is there room for a ".30 Grendel" in the modern hunting world?
 
Last edited:
Personally I think you've tried to cut the cake too fine. There is simply no market for a bunch of other 30's splitting up a couple of hundred FPS.
 
A 30-30 bolt gun fits in there, as does the aforementioned 300savage and 30 Remington. There are others I know I'm forgetting, but in this range of power there are TONS of other calibers that almost mute the question. And hand loaded 7.62x39 is the equivalent of a 300 savage or 30-30 energy wise. So the gap is smaller than you may think. Just my opinion though...
 
i think i seen a cartridge once that reminded me of the 7.92x33 but was a 30 cal and loaded to higher 62kpsi pressures, performed right in between 7.62x39 and 308 with a COAL of about 57mm
 
because even at 2400 fps with a 150 grain bullet, it's still more than enough for deer at 300 yards.

At 300 yards a 308 shooting 150 gr Hornady SST's @ 2400 fps has 1125 ft lbs energy, drops 20" and has about 11 ft lbs of recoil.

At 300 yards a 308 shooting 150 gr Hornady SST's @ 2800 fps has over 1600 ft lbs of energy and only drops 7.5" with about 14 ft lbs of recoil.

That load might very well kill a deer at 300 yards, but is right at its limits, plus an extra 12+" of drop is huge. I don't think you'll ever notice the 3 ft lbs of recoil.
 
At 300 yards a 308 shooting 150 gr Hornady SST's @ 2400 fps has 1125 ft lbs energy, drops 20" and has about 11 ft lbs of recoil.

At 300 yards a 308 shooting 150 gr Hornady SST's @ 2800 fps has over 1600 ft lbs of energy and only drops 7.5" with about 14 ft lbs of recoil.

That load might very well kill a deer at 300 yards, but is right at its limits, plus an extra 12+" of drop is huge. I don't think you'll ever notice the 3 ft lbs of recoil.
a black powder revolver with merely ~250ft/lbs of energy will shoot a hole straight through a deer, i think 1125ft/lbs will do just fine
 
If you are loading .308 already just download it a bit. Use lighter bullets. A 110 grain .308 bullet going 3000 FPS is going to be a light recoiling round out to 300 yards that the deer isnt going to walk away from if you hit it right.
 
There are several 30 caliber rounds that fall between the 7.62x39 & the 308 Winchester

30-30
7.5x54 MAS
300 Savage
30 Remington AR
30-40 Krag
308 Marlin Express

...just to mention a few
 
a black powder revolver with merely ~250ft/lbs of energy will shoot a hole straight through a deer, i think 1125ft/lbs will do just fine
Agreed. I think folks sweat the math too much.

Deer, in any iteration other than wapiti, are not tough or thick hide/thick boned animals. Shot placement is king, and a 762x51 at 300 yards is more than enough medicine for medium sized, thin skinned game, if not another 100 yards farther.
 
At 300 yards a 308 shooting 150 gr Hornady SST's @ 2400 fps has 1125 ft lbs energy, drops 20" and has about 11 ft lbs of recoil.

At 300 yards a 308 shooting 150 gr Hornady SST's @ 2800 fps has over 1600 ft lbs of energy and only drops 7.5" with about 14 ft lbs of recoil.

That load might very well kill a deer at 300 yards, but is right at its limits, plus an extra 12+" of drop is huge. I don't think you'll ever notice the 3 ft lbs of recoil.

Well certainly you're entitled to your opinion, but my shoulder can definitely tell the difference. As soon as I load above 2400 fps with a 150-grain bullet in my .308, the recoil becomes noticeably uncomfortable, as in, no big deal for one or three shots, but I'm not going to sit there and shoot that all day at the range. Part of the reason is that my hunting rifles are 7 lbs. or less due to the fact that I usually hunt on my feet during gun season.

I've always used the 1K ft. lb. standard for deer as I think that provides more than enough margin for error, esp. on 100 lb. Texas Whitetails. Deer get quickly and humanely killed every year with much less, but 1K is my comfort level.

So in my handloads, my goal is to produce a load in my .308 that gives me 1K ft. lbs. at 300 yards. I'm not going to shoot past 300 yards, so there's no point in my mind in wasting the energy. And I'm not going to take a quick shot at 300, so I should have plenty of time to range the critter with my rangefinder, and know where to aim, negating the trajectory question.

Yugorpk, that's what I'm doing now and it certainly works. I bought the .308 for it's versatility and that's exactly what I got.

I'm just surprised that with all the bullet choices in .30 caliber, and for how long that caliber has been around, there isn't something in a "7.62x45-ish" round that found it's way into the deer hunting world.

I know the 7mm-08 has become a very popular round because it features a lot of these characteristics. Just surprised there's not something that offers a heavier bullet with a similar amount of recoil in a bolt gun.

If there was a good, accurate, rimless .30-30-ish bolt gun with factory pointed bullets, I would think it would sell. I mean, how many deer have been killed with a 30-30 by now? Just seems the obvious thing to me. Guess I'm just off base though.
 
Mistwolf, the 30-40 Krag is another that makes me go "huh". Put in a rimless modern bolt action, it seems like the ideal deer killer for most of North America.
 
A 30-30 bolt gun fits in there, as does the aforementioned 300savage and 30 Remington. There are others I know I'm forgetting, but in this range of power there are TONS of other calibers that almost mute the question. And hand loaded 7.62x39 is the equivalent of a 300 savage or 30-30 energy wise. So the gap is smaller than you may think. Just my opinion though...
The hottest 7.62x39 loads I've seen are around 1600 ft-lbs, while 30-30 can push 2000 ft-lb+ and the 300 savage is 2600 ft-lb+.
 
Agreed. I own a 7.62x39 Savage 10, a 30-30 lever and a .308 Savage 11 and I've killed deer and hogs with all of them - in fact, 100's of hogs with the 30-30. The 7.62x39 is a very effective hunting round inside 150 yards, but it's definitely not the equal of the 30-30 based on my in-the-field results.

What I'm looking for is a factory loaded cartridge that gives me what I get in my reduced-load .308 rounds. 150 grain bullet at 2300-2400 fps. with the recoil of a .243/30-30.

6.5's and 7mm's are great rifles for shooting, but for hunting, I want a 150-165 grain bullet. They hit hard and don't waste as much meat as a fast-moving 100-120 grain round.

I can get factory 154-grain soft points for the 7.62x39 and they work superbly out to 150. Hogs are usually DRT. Of course, 150+ rounds for the .308 are easy to find. But finding 150 grain bullets in something that falls in-between isn't so easy to find.

Just browsing around, the .300 Savage is probably the closest to what I'm imagining. Guess I need to take a closer look at that caliber. Wonder why it isn't more popular? Anyone know how the recoil of the .300 Savage compares?
 
Last edited:
There is a 7.62x39 with a ".308 bore" that's made to shoot the more popular .308 bullets instead of the .311 bullets. They are available in a bolt gun.

However, IMO the round you described is the .30 Rem AR to a T. It is a ballistic twin to the .300 Savage, but ammo is easy to find online and the Reminton R-15 .30 RAR aren't made anymore, but are online at closeout prices. I paid less the $725 shipped for mine a few months ago. It has become my favorite woods rifle. Lightish (8lbs), accurate, semi-auto, plenty of power for deer out to 300+yds, and recoil is easy on my bad shoulder.
 
Just shoot "Managed Recoil" .308 ammo from Remington, or reload some reduced loads in .308 yourself.
 
Just browsing around, the .300 Savage is probably the closest to what I'm imagining. Guess I need to take a closer look at that caliber. Wonder why it isn't more popular? Anyone know how the recoil of the .300 Savage compares?

I agree with the poster above me who suggested 308 managed recoil loads; Hornady, Remington, and Federal offer them. Most of them are 125 grain though, lighter than what you want.

The 300 Savage is the parent of the 308. There's not a lot of difference between them in energy, so recoil should be about the same.
 
The Savage 340 is a bolt action .30-30. They are often very affordable too.

I think part of the issue is that if you stick with .30 cal and start going less powerful, 300yd shots start to get harder in terms of needing accurate range estimation. If you go sub-.30, you can reduce recoil and keep the flat trajectory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top