9.3x62 vs 338 Lapua for African plains game

Status
Not open for further replies.
"So let me ask this, for everyone that has used the 9.3x62 and/or the 35 Whelen and a .375, is the 375 significantly more in the "kick" department?"


I have a .35 Whelen and a .375 H&H. I don't like recoil, not at all. The .35 Whelen is easy like a .30-06+ while I have to use 235gr. bullets and less powder to be able to handle the .375 H&H.

To me it's like night and day.
 
338 win mag, other than some "legal concerns" is more than up to the task.
Just get a rifle that "fits" you.
One should being able to hit the "target" while winded and standing on their own hind legs....
 
338 win mag, other than some "legal concerns" is more than up to the task.
Just get a rifle that "fits" you.
One should being able to hit the "target" while winded and standing on their own hind legs....
What possible "legal" concern would one run into while using a .338 on plains game in South Africa?
 
Well I have to say now you all have me questioning myself on the 35 Whelen, the 9.3x62 and the 375 :confused:. I think that, for me, the front runner is still the 9.3x62, I'm just such a wuss when it comes to recoil. Heck, I'll probably end up getting a recoil reduction system for it! On the other hand you have all given me a lot to think about when it comes to the 375, which it seems I was very mistaken on when it comes to manageable recoil. I'm tempted to buy both, but I'm not sure I can justify the overlap heh. Can anyone recommend a good recoil reduction system, or anything that has helped them in particularly? And, as always, thank you all for your responses! As a side note I linked this forum to my brother, I think you have practically sold him on the 375 instead of the 338 :)!
 
The standard 35 Whelen using a 225 TSX, in the lightest rifle, i.e a Mod 700 CDL, will recoil less than a .375 or 9.3 when both are using 270-286gr bullets, respectively. However, it is wash if you take into account the 9.3 will feel so much like the 35 Whelen you couldn't tell. I agree, the 375 H&H is a different creature. It is a wonderful round, I've also used it here in Utah for elk. for that I had a regular Mod 700 BDL SS, with no recoil reduction just a good Decelerator recoil pad. It was a gem! Way less than a 12ga 3" anything! I had a Mod 700 Classic in .375 that needed a muzzlebrake, but I was setting it up for 300gr bullets for buffalo ( which never materialized, ha) The easiest .375s to shoot, and I mean very pleasant were the Mod 70 synthetic SS, CZ 550 and the Whitworth Express. All a tad heavier than a Mod 700, but not too bad. Any of those three are super fun to hunt with. I especially liked the 270gr bullets ( I used the old, now discontinued, Winchester Fail Safe factory ammo in Africa. I used the 235X and the 300 SierraBT here in Utah for both elk and mule deer.
For the 9.3x62, I don't know what happened, I suspect one rifle had bad headspace. Its no biggy if you train yourself to bolt another in if you hear that horrible "click", ha. I never had a problem with but one 338 WM, which was an early 80's Mod 70 that kicked like a demon, OMG style! I used muzzlebrakes on other 338win, 340W, 338RUM. The model 700 CDL comes with a really efficient recoil pad already, no need for anything else, but I can say the same for any 9.3x62 ( very nostalgic, very useful round too!) So, in my short experience, only the 338s and the Mod 700 classic in .375 benefited from a brake. But, I prefer lighter rifles. My favorite scope is the leupold 1.5x5 VIII., even for long shots. A 9x or so is very handy in more open areas, as said, depends on where you go! I hunted in northern South Africa ( Joberg, Pretoria and east of there and southern Namibia ( Aroab) That part of Namibia looks almost like 50 miles west of me, over in Skull Valley, Utah, ha. Only the plants there all have stickers and thorns!
 
Kinda depends on what plains game. On the light side, any deer cartridge will do fine on most antelope. However, if you're after eland or kudu, you might want a little more.

First thing I'd do is forget the Lapua. It's too much of a lot of what you don't need. There's several .338's that would be good do-all plains game cartridges but the Lapua isn't one of them. Matter of fact, I bought a Ruger .338RCM with this (and elk) in mind. Doesn't quite match the .338WM but basically replicates the .338-06 in a short action, lightweight 20" barreled rifle. Remember, you're going to be doing a lot of walking and not much shooting. I'll be damned if I'd want to carry a 10lb long range rig to make a 200yd shot on impala.

The Lapua would be more comparable to the .416Rigby on top (7lb .338 below).
IMG_6551b.jpg
 
Those are great points, thank you! I am thinking of picking up the 9.3x62 for this hunt and then perhaps a .416 if I ever decide to do anything dangerous. On the other hand the idea of getting the .375 and just using it as a "one and done" gun is pretty appealing as well! I think I'll drop a line to the outfit we plan to use in Africa to see what the shooting ranges are in general. On that note (if it's allowed, I don't want to violate any forum rules!) do any of you have any recommendations for a good hunting outfit out that way? I have read that some have you hunting right next to towns or within sight of an airport, I definitely want something more out in the country. No reason to go if it feels like I'm basically just shooting pests out of someones back yard!
 
I'm lucky enough to have gone to RSA twice. I took a 9.3x62 both times as did my hunting partner. The second time the airline lost his luggage for four days. Luckily a local gun store had some 9.3 in stock.

My main suggestion is to get a gun that fits you. I have a .375 H&H with a classic stock that really isn't bad for 10 to 15 rounds per range session. I also have a .416 Remington with a custom MacMillian Bros stock that is shootable all day. Except that even reloads are somewhat expensive. The 9.3 has a Boyd's stock and is very gentle compared to the damage it does down range.

You don't need a cannon to plains game hunt. Take a good deer rifle, premium ammo and an open attitude. AND a lot of camera cards. Remember you're on the other side of the planet. When things go wrong, and they will, shrug your shoulders look at each other and say "TIA". This Is Africa.
 
Like the man said, the H&H is considered a womans/kids round and a light kicker, in Africa. Americans are wussified for the most part.The 375 will have a nice rolling recoil. The 9.3 will not be bad. The Lapua will be brutal.
 
I'm lucky enough to have gone to RSA twice. I took a 9.3x62 both times as did my hunting partner. The second time the airline lost his luggage for four days. Luckily a local gun store had some 9.3 in stock.

My main suggestion is to get a gun that fits you. I have a .375 H&H with a classic stock that really isn't bad for 10 to 15 rounds per range session. I also have a .416 Remington with a custom MacMillian Bros stock that is shootable all day. Except that even reloads are somewhat expensive. The 9.3 has a Boyd's stock and is very gentle compared to the damage it does down range.

You don't need a cannon to plains game hunt. Take a good deer rifle, premium ammo and an open attitude. AND a lot of camera cards. Remember you're on the other side of the planet. When things go wrong, and they will, shrug your shoulders look at each other and say "TIA". This Is Africa.
Rick R touched on something that I've been wondering for a long time and if I could get some clarification on it I would really appreciate it. I have gone online looking at custom stocks and some of them are nearly as much as a new rifle. I was wondering, does the stock really make that much of a difference? I always thought that the stock a rifle came in would be best, since it was made for that rifle specifically, but are after market stocks really capable of making something like a .416 easy to shoot or am I missing something completely? I'm sorry, I know it's of topic a bit but I'm just really curious. Thank you!
 
CZ makes a 9.3x62 in an American style Kevlar stock with a 20" barrel. It should recoil easier ( come straight back instead of flipping up) than their Mannlicher Old World, which is not bad itself, I gave one to my German descent Son In Law. We both used it on hog. Take a look at both. OR, just use a nice 30-06 and Barnes 168gr TTSX ammo. It will work nicely and you can also find ammo for it over there, along with many others. I personally like the idea of medium calibers on game, especially thick skinned game like a lot of Plains game. Just keep researching, thinking about it, that's 80% of the fun of such a hunt! :)
 
I purchased a magnum action from a gent on an online forum and decided to spend what was necessary for a nice rifle over time. Waiting durn near killed me.

I sent my length of pull measurements to MacMillian and asked for a Decelerator recoil pad. The stock is their take on a classic Winchester stock. It was well worth the money I spent on it as was the Douglas barrel but I had to wait to get the barreled action back before I had all the specs to order the stock. None of these companies move fast as you're not buying off the shelf items. :banghead:

A friend has a similar rifle built by a big name gun smith in .338 Winchester magnum that is a pussy cat to shoot and handles like a 20ga shotgun. The .416 doesn't hurt to shoot but physically moves my 240# carcass every time the primer works. IMHO a well designed synthetic stock is worth the money.

All the hunting guides I met in Africa are most happy when a client shows up with a gun that is worn and well used in a caliber that is "sensible". Unless you plan on shooting eland or giraffe a .30-06, .308, or .270 will be appreciated. None of the Weatherby (they call them "Wound der Beast") cartridges is well thought of and muzzle brakes are specially despised. These guys and their staff hear hundreds of rounds fired each year so nice gentle rifles with shooters that know how to use them are welcomed.
 
Robert said:
My 375H&H comes in right at 10lbs and is a dream to shoot.

My Talkeetna is right at 9lb fully loaded and it's my favorite hunting rifle by far. As you mentioned, they're not the beasts that many think they are. They offer outstanding accuracy, excellent terminal performance with the right bullet, reasonable recoil and minimal meat damage. Many will cringe at the ultra modern look of my rifle below but I'll soon own a beautiful wood stocked Kimber Caprivi in .458 Lott so it all balances out.

talkeetna_dipped_final_01.jpg

talkeetna_dipped_final_03.jpg

talkeetna_dipped_final_02.jpg
 
Yes a good stock makes all the difference in the world. Wood is really a terrible stock material but it was all we had for hundreds of years, and some can be down right stunning. But they tend to ward,swell, trap water or split and are just unstable. That being said most shooters or hunterswill never know the difference.

Wood factory stock are turned out by the hundreds with little attention to proper fit. My 375 came from the factory with bedding made from silly putty and would not hold a group. Trip to the Smith, proper bed job and a crown job had her shooting nice and tight.

Manners and McMillian are pretty much the top of the line but you will pay for them. But you get a rock solid stock that is impervious to moisture. There are of less expensive stock makers out there and some of them make really good stocks, I've just never really had experience with them. I will, when I can afford it, be putting a McMillian stock on my 375.
 
Robert, out of interest, can your Winchester feed empty fired cases from the magazine. I get a kick out of showing off my Talkeetna. :D It will run through a full magazine of empty cases as fast as I can run the bolt. One of the smoothest rifles/actions I've ever handled.
 
MCMXI,

I'm not Robert, and my rifle is built on a Montana action. But it will feed empty .416 brass. It's great for dry fire practice.

I like your digi camoed rifle, that design probably confuses the eye pretty well sitting in the bush waiting to ambush game.
 
You have all been super helpful! I was agonizing over the decision last night when my wife looked over my shoulder, shook her head and said "babe, why don't you just buy both?" I loved being married to someone who also loves guns in her own right! :):):) So now I'm thinking of brands. I know CZ does very good work, I think you all have convinced me to redo the furniture on whatever I end up with to one of the above mentioned stocks (of course I'm also open to more mid-price alternatives if anyone has any suggestions) and I was wondering are there any brands to go towards, or perhaps more importantly to run away from? Also I will be taking either my 308 or my 6.5x55 Swede with me as my secondary rifle so no worries about me walking around Africa trying to kill a Blue Duiker with a 375 or a 9.3x62 (whichever I end up taking which is going to be a massive nail biter in it's own right!!). Again, and as always, thank you for your information and for sharing it so willingly!

Also, side note, all the gun pics posted have been beautiful, I love the wooden furniture but I have to say that ultra-modern looking one is really nice and I can not see any animal easily spotting it!
 
I have a 375 JRS, a 416 Rigby and a 338 Lapua.

The 375 is a pussycat to shoot.

The Rigby is a handful with full power ammo, but manageable.

My 338 sucks to shoot without a brake or suppressor.
 
I have a 375 JRS, a 416 Rigby and a 338 Lapua.

The 375 is a pussycat to shoot.

The Rigby is a handful with full power ammo, but manageable.

My 338 sucks to shoot without a brake or suppressor.
So...I apologies for my ignorance, I tried googling JRS rifles but I could not find the brand. If you have a moment can you tell me what the full name is? Also, to everyone else, I'm absolutely open to additional suggestions, thank you!
 
So...I apologies for my ignorance, I tried googling JRS rifles but I could not find the brand. If you have a moment can you tell me what the full name is? Also, to everyone else, I'm absolutely open to additional suggestions, thank you!
John R. Sundra (JRS) necked an 8mm Remington Magnum to 375 caliber. Its performance is indistinguishable from the .375 H&H AI or 375 Weatherby. Winchester cataloged the cartridge from their custom shop for several years.
 
.375 JRS is a wildcat cartridge, not a brand of rifle. Stands for gunzine writer Jon R. Sundra who wanted something more modern than the 1912 .375 H&H.
It is most readily made by necking an 8mm Remington Magnum up to .375.
 
Oh, well, that explains why I couldn't find hide nor hair of it. Thank you for the lesson!
 
Check with H&Hhunter.
At one time your ammo headstamp had to agree with your rifle's caliber marking.
No wildcats or reformed brass.
Maybe they have quit bothering with that to accommodate crazy Americans.
 
Check with H&Hhunter.
At one time your ammo headstamp had to agree with your rifle's caliber marking.
No wildcats or reformed brass.
Maybe they have quit bothering with that to accommodate crazy Americans.
That can be a HUGE problem. It just depends on which African customs agent you get and what mood he's in. I was once almost arrested while on a hunting trip in Tanzania because I tried to leave the country with ten less cartridges than I entered with. Agent "You entered Tanzania with 40 bullets, why are you trying to leave with only 30?". Me "I shot ten bullets while I was here".... Thirty minutes later I released with a stern warning and a lecture on the laws of Tanzania. TIA gentlemen TIA!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top