Ohio Professor Offers Gun-Control Solution: "Storm NRA HQ & Make Sure There Are No Su

Ahhh the ironic hypocrisy of the anti 2nd Amendment crowd.
Kind of like when that late night tv guy held up a photo with the cross hairs on President Bush and said "Sniper wanted."

It proves the old adage -- only violent criminals oppose other people having guns.

The guy has obviously lost his marbles, or else the whole thing is a joke. If he's so opposed to guns, how does he even know how to use them to shoot up the NRA headquarters? (Notice that he recommends that somebody else do so. He doesn't even have the courage of his own convictions.)

.
If "Storm the NRA HQ & Make Sure There Are No Survivors" didn't sound like the rant of a lunatic, it would be a terrorist threat.

Good grief.

He claims that he was joking and that only non-thinking idiots would take his words any other way. I find it more believable that only a non-thinking idiot would either make such a joke or say such a thing with serious intent.

We'll see. Any investigation will involve interviewing his students to see how he talks in class.

He claims that he was joking and that only non-thinking idiots would take his words any other way. I find it more believable that only a non-thinking idiot would either make such a joke or say such a thing with serious intent.

Click to expand...

You got that right. This guy is certifiable!

Would he have thought it was a joke if an NRA supporter had said the NRA should storm the college and leave no survivors?

You're expecting Liberals to abide by the same rules that govern OTHER people. But they're too good for that.

According to Google, I live about 20 minutes from that college and have never heard of it. But it's smack in the middle of redneck central, so I can't imagine that statement going over well with the five students likely in his classroom at the time. Hillsboro, Ohio is not what you would call a hub of liberal idealism.

When is the last time anyone has heard any positive statement about the NRA outside gun circles? How the *censored* did the largest pro firearm group in the country come to the point where it gets as much positive press as the KKK?

Any positive press? NRA teaches firearm safety across the nation and that's not worth of a little blurb but a blatantly false accusation that the group advocates murdering children gets headlines?

This akin to the recommendation by some anti-gunners if they see a person known to have a conceled carry permit/license on the street, to call 911, report Man With Gun Menacing, to get the concealed carry SWATted. Comments like that on anti-gun boards usually get taken down by moderators and you have to do a screen capture to have a record of it. I do know in sixty years of following this issue, there are anti-gunners who have advocated suspending the 4th Amendment if the subject is guns and doing dragnet searchs for guns in homes.

A primary source on this FB post is:
Rory Ryan, "Southern State Community College faculty member investigated over social media comments", The Highland Press, Hillsboro, 19 June 2016. 14 Comments.
http://www.highlandcountypress.com/...ated-over-social-media-comments/-10/-10/33560

If the Professor got his wish and "a bunch of us anti-gun folks armed themselves" and assaulted NRA headquarters, then I'm taking the NRA -10 points to win.

Sorry, but this is funny how? He should be fired immediately.

In general I observe repeatedly how the left's idea of expressing disagreement is either profanity (e.g. "[verb beginning with f] Trump") or violent statements like the one reported here. I wonder whether their opposition to guns is really fear of their own violent desires.

There are quite a few other new gun owners among my circle of friends, every single one of us decided to learn to shoot and buy a gun because of concerns about terrorism and criminal activity. I've never heard anyone propose attacking even the most egregiously left-wing politician, yet the lefties do it all the time, look at all the tweets etc about assassinating Trump, and how they behave at Trump rallies.

You can never underestimate the intense ideological commitment and utter ruthlessness of the gun control & confiscation clique. Actually, the leftists in general are nasty, mean-spirited and quite vicious.

Private gun ownership is truly looked upon by them as a scourge that ought to have no place in a "refined" and "civilized" society.

You can never underestimate the intense ideological commitment and utter ruthlessness of the gun control & confiscation clique. Actually, the leftists in general are nasty, mean-spirited and quite vicious.

Click to expand...

We have a local rag, Arkansas Times, that seems to be a home for spite-filled left-wing bigots. If they don't like you, they will call you:

A. Homosexual
B. Homophobic
C. Both A and B.

AlexanderA said:

The guy has obviously lost his marbles, or else the whole thing is a joke. If he's so opposed to guns, how does he even know how to use them to shoot up the NRA headquarters? (Notice that he recommends that somebody else do so. He doesn't even have the courage of his own convictions.)

Click to expand...

Most typical of liberals and terrorists.
Would such actions not be considered terrorist?

Judging from his picture, he appears to be a some kind of wannabe pimp.

He's a "professor" at some backwoods community college. He's probably semi-literate.

The one problem with his plan is that he's probably got three guys with baggy pants that hold their Glocks sideways. On the other hand, his opponents (American gun owners) have the rest of the 300 million guns.

I've always said these kinds of folks are living contradictions, divided by zero to their very core. The rationalizations, the hypocrisy, the relativism, the counter-productive panacea solutions, and ultimately the self-destructive behavior of both the individual & the systems they would have rule over us. A kind of
moral schizophrenia.

TCB

yokel is spot-on.

Every single one of the most immoral, selfish, and even some cross into the evil category of folks I've ever had to spend time around, come from that side of the aisle.

Have to say though, a lot of that side are just ignorant, and I can work on that.
That fella, I put him in the evil group.

The one problem with his plan is that he's probably got three guys with baggy pants that hold their Glocks sideways.

Click to expand...

Uh, no, it'd more likely be three older women with tie-dyed shirts and birkenstocks, carrying brownies and hoping to shame the NRA staffers into submission.

Sorry, but this is funny how? He should be fired immediately.

Click to expand...

It isn't. Gallows humor is sometimes preferable, however, to blowing a coronary. I agree with you about the firing, in fact I opened the FBI page on reporting terrorist threats online intending to report the Facebook post, and then after it asked for name, address, phone and political leanings, I decided I'd rather hope that one of you had already done so.

matrem said:

Every single one of the most immoral, selfish, and even some cross into the evil category of folks I've ever had to spend time around, come from that side of the aisle.

Click to expand...

Either you've managed to expose yourself to a statistically unlikely set of people or (more likely) you've put on blinders with regards to those who agree with your political opinion in order to support your worldview. Horrible people come from every walk of life, and pretending like it's just the -other- side who has people with undesirable traits is a classic tactic to increase group solidarity as well as stifling dissent by dehumanizing the enemy.

Funny enough, it's that kind of propagandizing that leads to things like espousing that NRA members should be slaughtered en mass to garner support for gun control measures.

berettaprofessor said:

Uh, no, it'd more likely be three older women with tie-dyed shirts and birkenstocks, carrying brownies and hoping to shame the NRA staffers into submission.

Click to expand...

Considering that my girlfriend is a tye-dye and Birkenstock wearing hippie as well as a staunch supporter of the second amendment, I'd appreciate it if you'd dispense with the blanket generalizations regardless of whether it's an attempt at humor.

This is The High Road. The purpose of this forum isn't a place to get together and complain about liberals, it's about supporting the Second Amendment through means of promoting responsible firearms ownership as well as promoting a positive public image. Making sloppy statements based in emotion and bias is supposed to be the kind of thing we're advocating against when we argue against emotionally charged gun control measures. It's time to stop accepting it just because it's "our" side that's doing it.