tubeshooter
Contributing Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2006
- Messages
- 2,136
I think the "dying quality in the world today" might just be the concept of simply agreeing to disagree.
I really like #4 and 5 shot because they will pass all the way through a squirrel at 35 yards and not stay in the meat to break my teeth. In rural self defence, besides humans, there are also snakes, poultry preditors, rabid skunks and coons, feral dogs and cats, etc. They often get more than one shot becauce I want them dead. If these guys on those videos and posting in this forum have not killed some stuff then they are using hearsay and assumptions. I have never seen balistic gel dressed in denim chasing my chickens, but I have seen coyotes and feral dogs. I think there is a lot of internet hype being spouted here. I f you want to know what it takes to disable or kill, go kill something. I was once was attacked by a guinea hen after AFTER I chopped its head off. My father killed a hog DRT with one rock from a sling shot. I have killed squirrels DRTwith gut shots and shot at others so many times they died of smoke inhalation.
Your hypothesis was demonstrated to be incorrect. Now move on.It is factually completely correct. You are not dealing with each individual shot passing through its own hole. You have lots of shot following other shot through tissue damaged by the leading shot. At the beginning of the impact the tissue is compromised. It's repeated impacts in multiple locations. It's one of the factors that make a shotgun so effective. You have to think of it like bead blasting. Same effect on a smaller scale. It's not speculation, it's common sense. Apparently that is a dying quality in the world today.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk