AA #5 vs AA #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
I use Bullseye, W-231 Accurate #2 and #5, and VV n340 for 45 acp, I will at some point do some more testing with Power Pistol, True Blue and Be-86.
One good thing about the powder shortage is I have found some new powders that work very well.
 
My understanding is that it was actually designed/developed as a powder for hot 9mm SMG rounds. But it became popular as a reloading powder in .38 super in compensated USPSA/IPSC race guns, in part because it is slow enough to reach high velocities, and because it produces a large volume of gas to run a compensator well. Neither one of those traits recommends it for .45 ACP!

Didn't say it was. :)
 
I started using #5 about 11 years ago as a alternative to Unique for 45 acp, 44 spl and 38 spl since then I have found that VV n340 and True Blue work well in this realm.
 
AA #2 is great for plinking/target loads in .45 ACP. AA #5 is great for full power .45 loads. I have never used AA #7 in .45 ACP. It is a bit slow for the application and uses a good bit more powder for virtually no more velocity.
 
AA #2 is great for plinking/target loads in .45 ACP. AA #5 is great for full power .45 loads. I have never used AA #7 in .45 ACP. It is a bit slow for the application and uses a good bit more powder for virtually no more velocity.
I agree, unlike the 9mm and 40 S&W the 45 Auto is a low pressure round comparatively and better served by AA#5 than AA#7 IMO. Just a note, I'm told AA#5 was developed around the 45 Auto, so.....
 
Have started trying AA-7 for 45 acp plus p 230 gn loads, which is actually listed in their manual. Appears to be working very well, minimal flash and clean burning from 5 incher. it is touchy on powder charges in the heavy 45 acp loads.

It works very well for heavier 9mm, 40 s&W, and midrange 357 mag loads. It can leave burned granules behind, but leaves bore clean.

it did not do well in the target loads tried.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top