Is there a way to permanently "lock" a scope adjustment?

Status
Not open for further replies.

12Pump

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
314
I guess this would be a question for anyone who has ever successfully dismantled a scope that was giving them trouble in attempt to fix it. It would certainly apply to anyone who has done this in response to a scope with a "wandering zero".

My scope is one of those cheaper ones that everyone was warning me about. It's a Simmons. I've zeroed it in only to have begin shooting 5" too low. While readjusting the elevation, it then started shooting a couple inches to the right. While still only adjusting elevation, it then started shooting about 6" to the right. I was ready to give up on it at this point, but then looked up some videos on Youtube about fixing cheap scopes. However, my Simmons scope doesn't appear to have a way of disassembly. Not sure how the manufacturer got it together in the first place.

But now I've managed to get it zeroed again and I have a question about keeping it that way. Is there a place that I could put in a few drops of lock-tite in order to keep it from straying from it's current adjustment? It might involve some minor disassembly that I'm not knowledgable right now about how to do. I know that would mean not being able to adjust it again, but I see no need to do so once it's lined in perfectly. It's either that or throw it in the garbage. Since I only bought it less than 2 months ago, I'd rather not do that. Just looking for an option to keep it lined in while I'm still able to make adjustments. I had an even cheaper scope in the past that started behaving like this one is and then it lost its ability to be adjusted at all.
 
Last edited:
Call Bushnell, they'll repair, replace, or refund it.

If the adjustment control isn't twisting, then nothing you can do to the external control knob/dial will stop the inner spindle from continuing to slip. Opening a purged scope to "fix" a slipping zero by permanently locking the erector tube adjustment instead of having the OEM fix it under warranty is just foolish.
 
Call Bushnell, they'll repair, replace, or refund it.

If the adjustment control isn't twisting, then nothing you can do to the external control knob/dial will stop the inner spindle from continuing to slip. Opening a purged scope to "fix" a slipping zero by permanently locking the erector tube adjustment instead of having the OEM fix it under warranty is just foolish.

It's actually a Simmons, rather than a Bushnell scope.

The adjustment control twists freely. What I was hoping to do was to permanently fix the slipping zero by "locking" it in place so it can't slip anymore. Once I have it right where I want it, I'd be happy to keep it that way. As for warranty, Simmons says in their Limited Warranty that I have to pay $10 to pay for return shipping, plus the shipping cost to get it to them. If that's another $10, then that's already half of what I paid for it. I was just hoping there was something I could do myself. Since there are apparently some people around that have tinkered around successfully with scopes that stopped working rather than just throwing them away, I was hoping someone here could share their knowledge about it.
 
From what i read......

If you froze the scope, the zero would have changed. This would require adjustable external mounts to correct.

The cost of tools to take the scope apart, would cost more then the shipping.

I had an old Weaver scope that the cross hairs started rotating clock wise. Easy fix as the cross hairs were in the eye piece. I would guess , most are not.
 
From what i read......

If you froze the scope, the zero would have changed. This would require adjustable external mounts to correct.

The cost of tools to take the scope apart, would cost more then the shipping.

I had an old Weaver scope that the cross hairs started rotating clock wise. Easy fix as the cross hairs were in the eye piece. I would guess , most are not.

Yeah, I'm not quite sure how to disassemble it. I used to have a small Tasco scope and it was easy to take apart. All I had to do was unscrew it and the eyepiece came right off and the reticle was right there at the end of the barrel. I thought it would be the same with the Simmons, but there's nothing on it that unscrews at all. I have no idea how they assembled it if there's no way to disassemble it. I was hoping maybe there was a way to access the reticle by somehow removing the turret knobs.
 
I think T.K. Lee would not put dots in Simmons scopes, among a good many other brands. Probably assembled with glue in the first place.

At one time, there were benchrest shooters gluing their Leupold internal adjustments in place and using adjustable mounts.
 
It's actually a Simmons, rather than a Bushnell scope.

SMH... So what you might not know, but are about to learn...

Simmons is owned by Bushnell (which itself is owned ultimately by Vista Outdoors itself) and customer service issues for Simmons Optics are handled by the Bushnell office in Kansas City. When you call the customer service contact number on Simmons' website (800) 423-3537, you will hear the automated computer service say "Thank you for calling Bushnell Customer Service..."

So put away the bailing wire and duct tape, Bubba, call Bushnell/Simmons, and get your scope taken care of properly.

If the adjustment is slipping as you say - Simmons/Bushnell/Vista will replace/repair/refund it...
 
SMH... So what you might not know, but are about to learn...

Simmons is owned by Bushnell (which itself is owned ultimately by Vista Outdoors itself) and customer service issues for Simmons Optics are handled by the Bushnell office in Kansas City. When you call the customer service contact number on Simmons' website (800) 423-3537, you will hear the automated computer service say "Thank you for calling Bushnell Customer Service..."

So put away the bailing wire and duct tape, Bubba, call Bushnell/Simmons, and get your scope taken care of properly.

If the adjustment is slipping as you say - Simmons/Bushnell/Vista will replace/repair/refund it...

Thanks for letting me know! I wasn't aware of this. Hopefully, a "repair" won't cost as much as they told me it would since their warranty states I'd have to pay $10 for shipping each way. That comes out to half of what I paid for it. It was normally $50, but I got it on sale for $40.
 
The amount of time and effort you will have to put in to fix that Simmons is more than what a new scope will cost.

A new (decent) scope, if I'm to believe what I've been told by others, will cost about $120.
 
Stop screwing around and buy a decent scope!

I've learned recently that it's nice to be able to fix things when possible. Besides, I thought I WAS buying a decent scope when I bought this one. My previous one cost only $10 and it allowed me to hit perfectly and I was completely satisfied with it for a couple years, and then it broke. When I was told at that time to get something "decent", I figured one that costs 5 times as much should fill the bill. Now I'm told I have to at least double that amount again. Heck, I have a pair of 7x35mm binoculars from Simmons that cost $40, and they're perfectly good as well. I saw no reason why a $50 scope wouldn't be just as good.
 
You need to find someone with REAL decent optics and ask them to let you take a look through.

There is no $50 optic which is "decent." There certainly is no $10 optic which is decent. Frankly, I'd contend there really is no $120 optic which is actually very good either. If you spend some time shooting optics which are ACTUALLY decent, you'll change your position about that $10 scope, this $50 scope, or those $40 binos. No knock on Simmons, really, they manufacture, market, and sell low quality optics at commensurate prices - can't blame them for the willingness of foolish people to pay for low quality products. They do make some better stuff, and the prices reflect the quality of those particular items.

I've never been charged return shipping from Bushnell on any warranty repair/replace/refund item. They will also typically send you a RMA, so even the shipping to get it back to them is usually free.

Now... If you've already tampered with this scope to the point they have a justifiable position to say you caused damage, then all bets are off. Lesson learned, throw it in the trash and go buy a new optic. Hopefully a REAL one this time.
 
"Decent" is a relative term I guess. Since Simmons is at the very low end of scopes in price, most people I imagine don't think of them as decent, especially when compared head to head with other scopes. And since decent can have many nuances and shadings many people, including myself view Simmons as the antithesis of decent while you view them as the opposite.
 
I have been poor and understand needing to cut corners but there is a bottom line when it comes to optics. There's no such thing as a "decent" cheap optic but there are some get arounds. If I only had $150 or so to spend on a scope I'd look for a used Weaver K4. They're good scopes and will satisfy most needs to 200 yards. If you must go new, save up about $250 and look at the Nikon Pro Hunter line. If you treat it gently and don't run a lot of magnum loudenboomers you should get a fair amount of life out of it. Or you can move up to a Leupold VX2 or better for not a lot more cash and be happy from now on.

That's just the hard truth. Cheap optics aren't really cheap.
 
There is no $50 optic which is "decent." There certainly is no $10 optic which is decent. Frankly, I'd contend there really is no $120 optic which is actually very good either. If you spend some time shooting optics which are ACTUALLY decent, you'll change your position about that $10 scope, this $50 scope, or those $40 binos. No knock on Simmons, really, they manufacture, market, and sell low quality optics at commensurate prices - can't blame them for the willingness of foolish people to pay for low quality products. They do make some better stuff, and the prices reflect the quality of those particular items.

So I guess there's even debate on whether or not a $120 scope is decent. Well, I haven't spent any time with better scopes, but I've had a chance to try other optics that were much higher priced and couldn't see really any difference. I've been in stores where binoculars costing many hundreds of dollars were on display and I got to try those out to see how they compare to ones I'm used to such as my $40 Simmons. Honestly, I couldn't see any real difference. I've tried other products too, such as headphones. I've tested ones that cost $30, and they were decent. They seemed to get better up to around $100 and then I didn't notice too much difference from that point upward. I guess different people perceive different things. My very biggest concern with a scope is that I can adjust the reticle so that it matches where the bullet impacts, and stays there unless I adjust it again. Beyond that, I'm not into fancy reticle designs that are designed for long range shooters, or huge optics for very low-light shooting.

I've never been charged return shipping from Bushnell on any warranty repair/replace/refund item. They will also typically send you a RMA, so even the shipping to get it back to them is usually free.

Ok, well maybe I'll give this a try. Right now though, my scope actually seem to be holding zero again. I'm afraid to try any more adjustments lest I knock something loose. If it loses zero again, I'll give Bushnell a call.

Now... If you've already tampered with this scope to the point they have a justifiable position to say you caused damage, then all bets are off. Lesson learned, throw it in the trash and go buy a new optic. Hopefully a REAL one this time.

I haven't. I did attempt to take it apart, but found that there was nothing that could be unscrewed in order to take it apart.
 
Last edited:
I have been poor and understand needing to cut corners but there is a bottom line when it comes to optics. There's no such thing as a "decent" cheap optic but there are some get arounds. If I only had $150 or so to spend on a scope I'd look for a used Weaver K4. They're good scopes and will satisfy most needs to 200 yards. If you must go new, save up about $250 and look at the Nikon Pro Hunter line. If you treat it gently and don't run a lot of magnum loudenboomers you should get a fair amount of life out of it. Or you can move up to a Leupold VX2 or better for not a lot more cash and be happy from now on.

That's just the hard truth. Cheap optics aren't really cheap.

Here's a question for you: What scope brand would you get if you were buying one at an auction? There's a LGS in town that just went out of business and will be having an auction later this month, and I think they'll have some scopes there. Of course, there would be no warranty unless a company had a lifetime warranty regardless of owner, such as Leopold. I bought a used scope from this store (I don't recall the brand exactly, but I think it was a bushnell) in the past and the reticle wouldn't adjust. I got a refund for it. Anyway, I was just thinking maybe I could get a good auction deal, but I'd like whatever I get to have some sort of safeguard in case it's junk.
 
12Pump said:
Well, I haven't spent any time with better scopes, but I've had a chance to try other optics that were much higher priced and couldn't see really any difference.

You are definitely the exception. And if are looking at them in a store the difference isn't as noticeable. I guarantee my Meopta is much much better in low light and bright sunlight than your Simmons.
 
Cheap scopes are good until they aren't....whether that be they don't hold zero and you miss that important shot or they are so dim/unclear that you can't see to make the shot.
 
Looking at optics in a store is always a challenge - how many stores are 100yrds long? Let alone how many stores are 600yrds long? Natural light, with dawn and dusk issues indoors? Yeah... Didn't think so... When you get out in the field, out from under flourescent lights, you really notice the difference.

Buying optics based on fancy features or reticles is generally a losing proposition. Buying based on rock-bottom price is just as bad or worse. Glass quality should always be first and foremost. You don't get good glass for $50, or even for $120... There are a few serviceable models in that $150 ballpark, for limited range use (I have a few Simmons Prohunter handgun scopes which are sublimely serviceable which was only $125, as an example).
 
The issue could be caused by the turret screws not being tight. If they are then the scope isn't holding zero and it's junk. If it can't even hold its calibration how do you even know the calibrations are correct? Like if you had to re-zero your scope for a different distance and windage and need to make a first shot hit. chances are when you turn your turret 15 mils it may only turn 14.2 because of the shoddy workmanship on it. Which could throw you off by a foot or more. I recommend getting a better scope, The SWFA scopes are supposedly tested to mil spec in terms of durability and are $300, they come in mil dot turrets and reticle and can easily be slipped. Then again i have no idea if you're shooting a .22 or .338. If it is for around >100 yards then i still recommend a good scope because when you get a bigboy gun and it needs a scope a good fixed 10x should be .50 cal safe and get you out to 1000yards. Plus it'll teach you how to use mildots.
 
So I guess there's even debate on whether or not a $120 scope is decent. Well, I haven't spent any time with better scopes, but I've had a chance to try other optics that were much higher priced and couldn't see really any difference. I've been in stores where binoculars costing many hundreds of dollars were on display and I got to try those out to see how they compare to ones I'm used to such as my $40 Simmons. Honestly, I couldn't see any real difference. I've tried other products too, such as headphones. I've tested ones that cost $30, and they were decent. They seemed to get better up to around $100 and then I didn't notice too much difference from that point upward. I guess different people perceive different things. My very biggest concern with a scope is that I can adjust the reticle so that it matches where the bullet impacts, and stays there unless I adjust it again. Beyond that, I'm not into fancy reticle designs that are designed for long range shooters, or huge optics for very low-light shooting.



Ok, well maybe I'll give this a try. Right now though, my scope actually seem to be holding zero again. I'm afraid to try any more adjustments lest I knock something loose. If it loses zero again, I'll give Bushnell a call.



I haven't. I did attempt to take it apart, but found that there was nothing that could be unscrewed in order to take it apart.

Good morning 12Pump. With advances in technology even "cheap" scopes appear at times to have decent enough glass. A few differences between really cheap optics and those around 200.00 and up are the unseens; dependability, consistency, and reliability.
 
Like if you had to re-zero your scope for a different distance and windage and need to make a first shot hit.

I'm willing to bet this guy (or anybody with a $50 Simmons) isn't dialing ranges. He's talking about epoxying the dial adjustment (no turrets on a cheap Simmons), so dialing for range isn't in his game.
 
I'm willing to bet this guy (or anybody with a $50 Simmons) isn't dialing ranges. He's talking about epoxying the dial adjustment (no turrets on a cheap Simmons), so dialing for range isn't in his game.

Yes, this is true! I'm using (forgive the use of this term) "just a .22", which doesn't really require me to change adjustments since I only shoot within a narrow set of close ranges anyway. I've been able to sight in at 20 yards, and then shoot at 50 yards and get the same impact point. When I go out to 75 yards, the bullet drops about 4", but I usually just shoot between 20 and 50 yards anyway. Of course, if I were shooting something bigger and more serious such as a centerfire rifle for hunting purposes, then I could see the need for something more elaborate in a scope.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top