Antiqued Guns

Status
Not open for further replies.

jmar

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2016
Messages
262
Does anyone on here have an antiqued/aged gun they'd like to show? I enjoy the art of antiquing but don't own any currently. I wan't to get one soon, so maybe even we can go over the processes we use to get the antiqued finishes. I imagine I go a bit more crazy with it than some of you. The last gun I antiqued I put in a bucket of rocks and sand and shook it around for 15 mins. It worked pretty well to round off all the edges. The overall patina has proven hard for me, does anyone know a method to get a surface that is lightly pitted over the entire gun? So yea enough talking, please share them if you got them!
 
Coupe or eight years back antique-ing was something of a rage on THR BP. Lots of posts and pictures and discriptions of "how I did" it. A number of our Euro members got involved heavily IIRC.

Folks used stuff like vinegar, mustard and pickle juice to damage modern finishes with and such. Some looked very much 100+ years old when done.

Good luck with the search engine!

-kBob
 
I sold this but still have the pic of an antiqued 58 Remington from Taylor's,

DSC00042.JPG

It has the antiqued conversion cylinder in it and was a remarkable shooter.
 
Last edited:
I would love to show pictures of the previous gun I antiqued but I don't think the current owner would like any up sadly, but I think I did an alright job. I bought it on gunbroker for $150, and sold it for $500! The reason I bought that gun in the first place is to use it as a practice piece and I learned a lot from it. I have tried all sorts of chemical/food product patinas and none go as deep as I need. The next method I'm going to try is pure lemon juice mixed with pure sea salt chunks. My hope is the sea salt when sitting on the gun will dig little craters everywhere a salt grain is. This is the finish i'm going for: https://jamesdjulia.com/item/1326-373/
 
Howdy

I think this one looks pretty nicely antiqued.

Richards%20Conversion%20with%2044%20Colt%20Cartridges%2002_zpsxs1qjfja.jpg



This one too.

Russian%202nd%20Model%20with%2044%20Russian%20Ammo_zpstxk8hslu.jpg


Russian02.jpg




I think this pair came out pretty nice.

Winchester%201873%20and%20Bisley%20Colt%2038-40%20lighter%20saturated_zpsn4momdij.jpg



This is the only one I have that has been 'faked'. Somebody stripped all the finish off before I bought it. Of course shooting it with nothing but Black Powder for ten years, and not always cleaning it the same day has helped.

2nd%20Gen%20weathered_zpsn3dkzyvc.jpg





Longshot Logan was a beloved Cowboy Shooter who died a bunch of years ago. He had developed a pretty thorough way to antique a revolver. Here is a link to his method.

http://www.theopenrange.net/articles/Antiquing_SAA_Revolver.pdf
 
I like Longshot Logan's process:

http://www.theopenrange.net/articles/Antiquing_SAA_Revolver.pdf

I have done four revolvers and one rifle this way. Examples:

IMG_0257.JPG

IMG_0606.JPG




The Ruger Old Armies have had their hammer spurs lowered and a brass front sight cover installed. They are my main match guns for cowboy action shooting competition. I know some, perhaps many, will cringe when they see I removed the factory finish from the ROAs, but dang that black "paint" was just ugly.

My avatar shows one in action:

Arkansas Black Powder Championship, 2015.jpg


The rifle that I antiqued is a Uberti '66 carbine. I refinished the stock at the same time I antiqued it, getting rid of the Uberti red varnish. A few years of blackpowder exposure has given the receiver an interesting patina in my opinion:

Screen Shot 2017-07-24 at 9.50.03 PM.png

Some folks think it is awful to remove the factory finish. I don't do it on all my guns, but I like the looks of the ones I have done.

Good luck!

(Driftwood Johnson beat me to the draw with the link to Longshot Logan's recipe. Not the first time!! ;))
 
I have been working on antiquing an Uberti revolving Navy "pistol" this month. The project is going to run into next month 'cause I am heading to Dixon's Muzzleloading Fair this weekend. :)
 
Here's a pair of factory antiqued Uberti .45's. Along with some authentic and artificially aged leather. ;)

IMG_9243b.jpg

IMG_9246b.jpg


Been thinking about aging my own with the same methods I use for tin, copper and brass for my leatherwork.

IMG_9171b.jpg

IMG_7462b.jpg
 
That should be obvious. Because it looks like a 150yr old relic but shoots like a new one, doesn't have worn out parts, a dark pitted bore and doesn't cost thousands of dollars.

Same reason why somebody might want something like this:
Knife%20and%20Sheath%20Beaded%2009-2%20image%203%20of%203.jpg

Over something like this:

31e4130489ead1539ef3cb6c993c7232--deer-hide-knife-sheath.jpg
 
Last edited:
Well I have a dumb question. What is the purpose of aging/antiqueing a reproduction gun? Is it just a preference for the distressed look?

I am in total agreement. It seems to me that most of these folks might be re-enactors or into CAS. I would think that re-enactors would pretty much prefer pristine firearms as they would have appeared in the day. As an example, show me an original Colt 1851 Navy manufactured just prior to the ACW as it appeared in 1861, and it would probably show little wear or abuse.

When I was a teen in the 60's, my father acquired many older firearms from the early-mid 20th Century. The first thing he would do is remove the wood and refinish it to look "new" as that was the norm back then. He had a 1894 Winchester in .25-35 (1919 date of manufacture) that had an original oil-finished stock that he inherited from his father, who won it in a punch-card game back in the 30's. I remember him complaining that there was so much oil in the wood that he could not apply the then state-of-the-art wood finish. He spent many nights with the wood under a heat lamp. He also reblued it using a Herter's solution. My oh my, he thought it was pretty, and it basically looked like a new rifle. In retrospect, I think he was wrong in doing so, but those were his guns.

He did the same thing with a Winchester Model 12 16 gauge: ordered a birdseye maple stock and fore end from Reinhart Fajen for it and we spent an entire afternoon re-blueing it with Herter's Belgian blue. That was an education for me in 1970.

That is 180* out from today's thinking.

I hope all of the antiquers completely defarb the firearm of any Italian proof marks, datecodes, manufacturer marks, et al so it actually looks like an old Winchester, Colt, Remington, or other, for their purposes. That way, it will allow the next oblivious owner to offer it on an auction site like GB as an original to any uninformed potential buyers. :-(

I have 3 Pietta 1851 Navy .36 type pistols LNIB that have not been defarbed in any way, but I can create 6 pistols by easily swapping barrel, cylinder, and frame, 3 of which Pietta never put on the market. I can create a Pietta Leech and Rigdon on a Pietta steel frame using the part octagon/part round barrel and the smooth cylinder from the G&G. I could offer it on GB as a rare Pietta L&R for $300+ and most lookers would be none the wiser as it does not appear on Pietta's website nor anywhere else. I could also do the same with my Pietta 1851 Navy squareback TG with the same barrel and cylinder and call it a rare Pietta 1851 Navy 2nd Model Dragoon .36 caliber, which never existed historically.

Leech and Rigdon:

Pietta_Leech_Rigdon.jpg


1851 Navy Second Model Dragoon .36 caliber:

Pietta_1851_Navy_Dragoon.jpg

That's my take and I know the antiquers have a different view.

Good night all!

Jim
 
I hope all of the antiquers completely defarb the firearm of any Italian proof marks, datecodes, manufacturer marks, et al so it actually looks like an old Winchester, Colt, Remington, or other, for their purposes. That way, it will allow the next oblivious owner to offer it on an auction site like GB as an original to any uninformed potential buyers. :-(

I saw one like that at a gun show. The real clanger was the installation of the 1970s vintage "Legal Defender" cartridge conversion which bears no close resemblance to 1870s conversions.
 
We'll I have a dumb question. What is the purpose of aging/antiqueing a reproduction gun? Is it just a preference for the distressed look?
Almost all the replicas made come with incorrect finishes anyways, so you may aswell just take that incorrect finish off and give it a worn look that does appear correct. Also I have never seen any replica that mimics the original gun perfectly even the Colt lettered 2nd gen guns have major differences. In the past I have used grinders, drills, and files to correct as many changes as possible which obviously ruins the factory finish. So you can either pay a lot to have it reblued or do what I referred to in my first sentence. Yet another reason is that they are cheap and their value is not hurt much at all doing it, nor does anyone care as they are still mass produced. I would not likely do it to a 2nd generation Colt, but I would do it to a used ASM I got for $300. Those are all the practical reasons. But there's no reason to be practical in life, some people just like the look of it, after all I've never once heard of somebody shooting an original Walker in the modern day. And nobody is saying you have to drag the gun behind a pickup, most people just age the gun about 10-30 years which is actually more than the span they were used from when they were bought new until cartridge guns replaced them. I believe Colts came factory with a charcoal finish which quickly rubbed off, then with BP corrosion and daily use cleaning and wear guns of the old west got worn quickly. Many of the guns shown in this thread are probably still in better condition then what a cowboy would have pulled out of his holster in 1870.
 
Most artificially antiqued guns I have seen, especially the factory jobs like CraigC shows, have had the finish chemically stripped or discolored.
But they don't have any wear marks from handling or holstering.
 
Lets face it, the Italian do a sorry job with the appearance of most of their reproductions. They often have a ton of flaws, sometimes looking barely like the original gun they're trying to represent. They simply are not passionate enough about having a close reproduction. By and large, they do not care about shooting, firearms ownership, or history. They make them in Italy because it's a lot cheaper to make them there and there is a market for reproduction guns, they don't make them because they actually care about the hobby. That is why they have so many visual issues and why so many want them defarded. It's just to fix what the Italians could care less about, and to make them closer to ACTUAL reproductions so the average buyer can feel that much closer to history.
 
Excellent job. Looks like something you'd find tucked in the sash of some bandito down on the Rio Grande! That's what I'm talking about, THAT, THAT RIGHT THERE, is why antiqued and defarbed repros are badass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top